评估志愿者 "健康卫士 "干预措施,支持重症精神病患者管理自己的身体健康:可行性混合随机对照试验。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.746
Julie Williams, Ray McGrath, Karen Ang, Ioannis Bakolis, Andy Healey, Jorge Arias de la Torre, Isabel Mdudu, Fiona Gaughran, Euan Sadler, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Errol Green, Natalia Stepan, Gracie Tredget, Zarnie Khadjesari, Sean Cross, Nick Sevdalis
{"title":"评估志愿者 \"健康卫士 \"干预措施,支持重症精神病患者管理自己的身体健康:可行性混合随机对照试验。","authors":"Julie Williams, Ray McGrath, Karen Ang, Ioannis Bakolis, Andy Healey, Jorge Arias de la Torre, Isabel Mdudu, Fiona Gaughran, Euan Sadler, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Errol Green, Natalia Stepan, Gracie Tredget, Zarnie Khadjesari, Sean Cross, Nick Sevdalis","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population. There is evidence that support from volunteers can help the mental health of people with SMI, but little evidence regarding the support they can give for physical health.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention where volunteer 'Health Champions' support people with SMI in managing their physical health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial conducted in mental health teams with people with SMI. Volunteers delivered the Health Champions intervention. We collected data on the feasibility of delivering the intervention, and clinical and cost-effectiveness. Participants were randomised by a statistician independent of the research team, to either having a Health Champion or treatment as usual. Blinding was not done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 48 participants: 27 to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Data were analysed for 34 participants. No changes were found in clinical effectiveness for either group. Implementation outcomes measures showed high acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, but with low response rates. No adverse events were identified in either group. Interviews with participants found they identified changes they had made to their physical health. The cost of implementing the intervention was £312 per participant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Health Champion intervention was feasible to implement, but the implementation of the study measures was problematic. Participants found the intervention acceptable, feasible and appropriate, and it led them to make changes in their physical health. A larger trial is recommended, with tailored implementation outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 5","pages":"e172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a volunteer 'Health Champions' intervention supporting people with severe mental illness to manage their physical health: feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Williams, Ray McGrath, Karen Ang, Ioannis Bakolis, Andy Healey, Jorge Arias de la Torre, Isabel Mdudu, Fiona Gaughran, Euan Sadler, Mariana Pinto da Costa, Errol Green, Natalia Stepan, Gracie Tredget, Zarnie Khadjesari, Sean Cross, Nick Sevdalis\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2024.746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population. There is evidence that support from volunteers can help the mental health of people with SMI, but little evidence regarding the support they can give for physical health.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention where volunteer 'Health Champions' support people with SMI in managing their physical health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial conducted in mental health teams with people with SMI. Volunteers delivered the Health Champions intervention. We collected data on the feasibility of delivering the intervention, and clinical and cost-effectiveness. Participants were randomised by a statistician independent of the research team, to either having a Health Champion or treatment as usual. Blinding was not done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 48 participants: 27 to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Data were analysed for 34 participants. No changes were found in clinical effectiveness for either group. Implementation outcomes measures showed high acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, but with low response rates. No adverse events were identified in either group. Interviews with participants found they identified changes they had made to their physical health. The cost of implementing the intervention was £312 per participant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Health Champion intervention was feasible to implement, but the implementation of the study measures was problematic. Participants found the intervention acceptable, feasible and appropriate, and it led them to make changes in their physical health. A larger trial is recommended, with tailored implementation outcome measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"e172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.746\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的身体健康状况比普通人要差。有证据表明,志愿者的支持可以帮助重性精神病患者的心理健康,但很少有证据表明志愿者可以为他们的身体健康提供支持。目的:评估志愿者 "健康卫士 "支持重性精神病患者管理身体健康的干预措施的可行性:方法:在有 SMI 患者的心理健康团队中开展一项可行性混合随机对照试验。志愿者提供 "健康倡导者 "干预措施。我们收集了有关实施干预的可行性以及临床和成本效益的数据。参与者由独立于研究团队的统计人员随机分配到 "健康倡导者 "或常规治疗中。没有进行盲法操作:我们招募了 48 名参与者:干预组 27 人,对照组 21 人。对 34 名参与者的数据进行了分析。干预组和对照组的临床疗效均无变化。实施结果测量显示可接受性、可行性和适宜性较高,但响应率较低。两组均未发现不良事件。与参与者的访谈发现,他们发现了自己在身体健康方面的变化。每位参与者的干预成本为 312 英镑:结论:"健康卫士 "干预措施的实施是可行的,但研究措施的实施存在问题。参与者认为干预是可接受的、可行的和适当的,而且干预使他们的身体健康发生了变化。建议进行更大规模的试验,并采用量身定制的实施结果衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a volunteer 'Health Champions' intervention supporting people with severe mental illness to manage their physical health: feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial.

Background: People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population. There is evidence that support from volunteers can help the mental health of people with SMI, but little evidence regarding the support they can give for physical health.

Aims: To evaluate the feasibility of an intervention where volunteer 'Health Champions' support people with SMI in managing their physical health.

Method: A feasibility hybrid randomised controlled trial conducted in mental health teams with people with SMI. Volunteers delivered the Health Champions intervention. We collected data on the feasibility of delivering the intervention, and clinical and cost-effectiveness. Participants were randomised by a statistician independent of the research team, to either having a Health Champion or treatment as usual. Blinding was not done.

Results: We recruited 48 participants: 27 to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Data were analysed for 34 participants. No changes were found in clinical effectiveness for either group. Implementation outcomes measures showed high acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness, but with low response rates. No adverse events were identified in either group. Interviews with participants found they identified changes they had made to their physical health. The cost of implementing the intervention was £312 per participant.

Conclusions: The Health Champion intervention was feasible to implement, but the implementation of the study measures was problematic. Participants found the intervention acceptable, feasible and appropriate, and it led them to make changes in their physical health. A larger trial is recommended, with tailored implementation outcome measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信