移除水坝对地中海山区溪流碳处理的影响。

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176672
João Miguel Merces Bega, Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha, Margarita Menéndez López, Alba Camacho-Santamans, Daniel von Schiller
{"title":"移除水坝对地中海山区溪流碳处理的影响。","authors":"João Miguel Merces Bega, Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha, Margarita Menéndez López, Alba Camacho-Santamans, Daniel von Schiller","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global prevalence of obsolete or unsafe old dams necessitates the development of effective restoration approaches and expanded knowledge in this field. This study evaluates the effects of dam removal on carbon processing by measuring key ecosystem functions - organic matter decomposition, whole-reach metabolism, and gaseous carbon fluxes - in a mountainous Mediterranean stream. We compared these functions among three reaches: one where a dam was removed (restored), one with an intact dam (impacted), and one in natural conditions (reference). The measurements were conducted throughout the different seasons over the course of one year. Temperature-corrected organic matter decomposition rates and metabolic parameters in the restored reach showed intermediate values between those in the reference and impacted reaches. Additionally, dam removal resulted in carbon dioxide fluxes similar to those in the reference reach, whereas methane fluxes tended to be higher in the restored reach compared to the other reaches. Seasonal variation was high, and the observed effects were inconsistent across seasons for several functions. This inconsistency is likely due to uneven seasonal changes in the hydromorphological and physicochemical characteristics of the studied reaches. Our results indicate that, despite notable improvements, a longer timeframe is necessary for the restored reach to fully emulate the functional characteristics of the reference reach. While restoration by dam removal positively contributes to certain aspects of carbon processing, a more holistic approach, possibly encompassing broader hydromorphological and habitat enhancements, is needed to fully restore ecological processes in stream ecosystems. These insights are critical for informing future dam removal restoration projects, advocating the use of ecosystem function metrics as comprehensive indicators of ecological recovery and restoration success.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"176672"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dam removal effects on carbon processing in a mountainous Mediterranean stream.\",\"authors\":\"João Miguel Merces Bega, Davi Gasparini Fernandes Cunha, Margarita Menéndez López, Alba Camacho-Santamans, Daniel von Schiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global prevalence of obsolete or unsafe old dams necessitates the development of effective restoration approaches and expanded knowledge in this field. This study evaluates the effects of dam removal on carbon processing by measuring key ecosystem functions - organic matter decomposition, whole-reach metabolism, and gaseous carbon fluxes - in a mountainous Mediterranean stream. We compared these functions among three reaches: one where a dam was removed (restored), one with an intact dam (impacted), and one in natural conditions (reference). The measurements were conducted throughout the different seasons over the course of one year. Temperature-corrected organic matter decomposition rates and metabolic parameters in the restored reach showed intermediate values between those in the reference and impacted reaches. Additionally, dam removal resulted in carbon dioxide fluxes similar to those in the reference reach, whereas methane fluxes tended to be higher in the restored reach compared to the other reaches. Seasonal variation was high, and the observed effects were inconsistent across seasons for several functions. This inconsistency is likely due to uneven seasonal changes in the hydromorphological and physicochemical characteristics of the studied reaches. Our results indicate that, despite notable improvements, a longer timeframe is necessary for the restored reach to fully emulate the functional characteristics of the reference reach. While restoration by dam removal positively contributes to certain aspects of carbon processing, a more holistic approach, possibly encompassing broader hydromorphological and habitat enhancements, is needed to fully restore ecological processes in stream ecosystems. These insights are critical for informing future dam removal restoration projects, advocating the use of ecosystem function metrics as comprehensive indicators of ecological recovery and restoration success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"176672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176672\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球范围内普遍存在着陈旧或不安全的旧水坝,因此有必要制定有效的修复方法并扩大该领域的知识。本研究通过测量地中海山区溪流的主要生态系统功能--有机物分解、整个溪流的新陈代谢和气态碳通量--来评估水坝拆除对碳处理的影响。我们对三个河段的这些功能进行了比较:一个河段的水坝已被拆除(恢复),一个河段的水坝完好无损(受影响),一个河段的水坝处于自然条件下(参考),三个河段在一年中跨季节进行比较。修复河段的温度校正有机物分解率和代谢参数介于参考河段和受影响河段之间。此外,水坝拆除后,二氧化碳通量与参考河段相似,而甲烷通量在恢复河段往往高于其他河段。季节变化很大,而且在不同季节对几种功能的观测效果也不一致。这种不一致性可能是由于所研究河段的水文地貌和物理化学特征的季节变化不均衡造成的。我们的研究结果表明,尽管水质有了明显改善,但恢复后的河段需要更长的时间才能完全模拟参照河段的功能特征。虽然通过拆除水坝进行恢复对碳处理的某些方面有积极作用,但要完全恢复溪流生态系统的生态过程,还需要采取更全面的方法,可能包括更广泛的水文形态和生境改善。这些见解对未来的水坝拆除修复项目至关重要,提倡使用生态系统功能指标作为生态恢复和修复成功的综合指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dam removal effects on carbon processing in a mountainous Mediterranean stream.

The global prevalence of obsolete or unsafe old dams necessitates the development of effective restoration approaches and expanded knowledge in this field. This study evaluates the effects of dam removal on carbon processing by measuring key ecosystem functions - organic matter decomposition, whole-reach metabolism, and gaseous carbon fluxes - in a mountainous Mediterranean stream. We compared these functions among three reaches: one where a dam was removed (restored), one with an intact dam (impacted), and one in natural conditions (reference). The measurements were conducted throughout the different seasons over the course of one year. Temperature-corrected organic matter decomposition rates and metabolic parameters in the restored reach showed intermediate values between those in the reference and impacted reaches. Additionally, dam removal resulted in carbon dioxide fluxes similar to those in the reference reach, whereas methane fluxes tended to be higher in the restored reach compared to the other reaches. Seasonal variation was high, and the observed effects were inconsistent across seasons for several functions. This inconsistency is likely due to uneven seasonal changes in the hydromorphological and physicochemical characteristics of the studied reaches. Our results indicate that, despite notable improvements, a longer timeframe is necessary for the restored reach to fully emulate the functional characteristics of the reference reach. While restoration by dam removal positively contributes to certain aspects of carbon processing, a more holistic approach, possibly encompassing broader hydromorphological and habitat enhancements, is needed to fully restore ecological processes in stream ecosystems. These insights are critical for informing future dam removal restoration projects, advocating the use of ecosystem function metrics as comprehensive indicators of ecological recovery and restoration success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信