A-205 Evaluating the Cost and Importance of Supply Chain Resilience in the Clinical Laboratory

Background Recent pandemics, epidemics and outbreaks continually underscore the critical importance of resilient supply chains in healthcare, particularly in clinical laboratories where timely access to supplies is essential for patient care. Supply chain disruptions, whether due to global crises or localized challenges, can significantly impact laboratory operations, leading to delayed diagnoses, compromised patient outcomes, and increased costs. It is estimated that 70%-80% of a patients’ EMR is clinical laboratory results. Despite this, supply chain resilience in clinical laboratories remains an under-addressed issue and remains a buzzword. Methods To evaluate the cost and importance of supply chain resilience in the clinical laboratory, we conducted a comprehensive review and interviews with 9 Healthcare Supply Chain experts analyzing the impact of supply chain disruptions on laboratory operations and patient care. Data was also collected from a diverse range of clinical laboratories, including hospitals, independent labs, and research institutions, spanning different geographic regions as well as a survey of 50 Laboratory experts with a 50% response rate. Key metrics assessed included: -Frequency and duration of supply chain disruptions. -Financial costs incurred due to disruptions, including expenses related to expedited shipping, alternative sourcing, and inventory management. -Impact on laboratory workflow, turnaround times, and patient care outcomes. -Strategies employed to mitigate supply chain risks and enhance resilience. Results Our review revealed findings regarding the cost and importance of supply chain resilience in the clinical laboratory: -Supply chain disruptions were frequent, with 85% of laboratories experiencing at least one significant disruption in the past year and 100% in experienced disruptions 2022. -The average duration of disruptions was 2-3 weeks, leading to substantial delays in test processing and patient care. -Financial costs associated with disruptions averaged $50,000 per laboratory per annum, including expenses for rush orders, and premium-priced alternatives. -Common strategies employed were increased inventory or safety stocks, multi-vendor sourcing, and supply chain mapping. Conclusions The findings of this study underscore the critical importance of supply chain resilience in the clinical laboratory. Supply chain disruptions are not just inconveniences; they pose significant risks to patient safety, operational efficiency, and financial sustainability. Investing in supply chain resilience is imperative for laboratories to fulfill their mission of delivering timely and accurate patient results. To continue to enhance supply chain resilience, laboratories must adopt a proactive approach, leveraging data-driven insights and collaborative partnerships. This includes diversifying supplier networks and fostering closer collaboration between laboratory and procurement teams.