多条褶皱条对切除褶皱修复术后手术效果的临床影响。

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naoyuki Oka, Kyohei Masai, Yu Okubo, Kaoru Kaseda, Tomoyuki Hishida, Keisuke Asakura
{"title":"多条褶皱条对切除褶皱修复术后手术效果的临床影响。","authors":"Naoyuki Oka, Kyohei Masai, Yu Okubo, Kaoru Kaseda, Tomoyuki Hishida, Keisuke Asakura","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum, has undergone various improvements. However, the impact of using multiple bars on thoracic shape changes and surgical outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum between August 2014 and September 2021. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the number of bars placed and identified differences in surgical outcomes and morphological characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 225 patients were evaluated, of whom 132 were classified into the ≤2 bar group (using 1 or 2 bars) and 93 into the ≥3 bar group (using 3 or more bars). There was no difference in the preoperative Haller index [median (interquartile range), 4.59 (3.67-6.16) vs 4.67 (4.12-6.14), P = 0.227], and asymmetric excavatum was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (81% vs 51%, P < 0.001). The preoperative sternal torsion angle was larger in the ≥3 bar group, but no difference was found between the 2 groups postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications (≥grade 3) was comparable between groups (10% vs 17%, P = 0.105); however, postoperative pleurisy was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (12% vs 4%, P = 0.021). In univariable and multivariable analyses, ≥3 bar placement was the only risk factor for postoperative pleurisy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of multiple bars (≥3 bars) is useful for the correction of asymmetric pectus excavatum, but attention should be paid to the potential risk of postoperative pleurisy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of multiple pectus bars on surgical outcomes following pectus excavatum repair.\",\"authors\":\"Naoyuki Oka, Kyohei Masai, Yu Okubo, Kaoru Kaseda, Tomoyuki Hishida, Keisuke Asakura\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivae168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum, has undergone various improvements. However, the impact of using multiple bars on thoracic shape changes and surgical outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum between August 2014 and September 2021. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the number of bars placed and identified differences in surgical outcomes and morphological characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 225 patients were evaluated, of whom 132 were classified into the ≤2 bar group (using 1 or 2 bars) and 93 into the ≥3 bar group (using 3 or more bars). There was no difference in the preoperative Haller index [median (interquartile range), 4.59 (3.67-6.16) vs 4.67 (4.12-6.14), P = 0.227], and asymmetric excavatum was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (81% vs 51%, P < 0.001). The preoperative sternal torsion angle was larger in the ≥3 bar group, but no difference was found between the 2 groups postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications (≥grade 3) was comparable between groups (10% vs 17%, P = 0.105); however, postoperative pleurisy was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (12% vs 4%, P = 0.021). In univariable and multivariable analyses, ≥3 bar placement was the only risk factor for postoperative pleurisy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The placement of multiple bars (≥3 bars) is useful for the correction of asymmetric pectus excavatum, but attention should be paid to the potential risk of postoperative pleurisy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Nuss 手术是一种治疗胸廓外翻的微创手术,经过了各种改进。然而,使用多根横杆对胸廓形状变化和手术效果的影响仍不清楚:我们回顾性评估了 2014 年 8 月至 2021 年 9 月间接受 Nuss 手术治疗胸肌下垂的患者。我们根据放置横杠的数量将患者分为两组,并确定了手术结果和形态特征的差异:共对 225 例患者进行了评估,其中 132 例被归入≤2 根横杠组(使用 1 或 2 根横杠),93 例被归入≥3 根横杠组(使用 3 根或更多横杠)。术前霍勒指数没有差异(中位数[四分位数间距],4.59 [3.67-6.16] vs 4.67 [4.12-6.14],P = 0.227),≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟(81% vs 51%,P 结论:≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟(81% vs 51%,P 结论:≥3 条组更常观察到非对称性腹股沟):放置多根横杠(≥3 根横杠)有助于矫正不对称的胸肌下垂,但应注意术后胸膜炎的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical impact of multiple pectus bars on surgical outcomes following pectus excavatum repair.

Objectives: The Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgery for pectus excavatum, has undergone various improvements. However, the impact of using multiple bars on thoracic shape changes and surgical outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum between August 2014 and September 2021. We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the number of bars placed and identified differences in surgical outcomes and morphological characteristics.

Results: A total of 225 patients were evaluated, of whom 132 were classified into the ≤2 bar group (using 1 or 2 bars) and 93 into the ≥3 bar group (using 3 or more bars). There was no difference in the preoperative Haller index [median (interquartile range), 4.59 (3.67-6.16) vs 4.67 (4.12-6.14), P = 0.227], and asymmetric excavatum was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (81% vs 51%, P < 0.001). The preoperative sternal torsion angle was larger in the ≥3 bar group, but no difference was found between the 2 groups postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications (≥grade 3) was comparable between groups (10% vs 17%, P = 0.105); however, postoperative pleurisy was more frequently observed in the ≥3 bar group (12% vs 4%, P = 0.021). In univariable and multivariable analyses, ≥3 bar placement was the only risk factor for postoperative pleurisy.

Conclusions: The placement of multiple bars (≥3 bars) is useful for the correction of asymmetric pectus excavatum, but attention should be paid to the potential risk of postoperative pleurisy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信