推广卫生信息系统,为提高绩效的决策提供指导:埃及吉萨眼科研究所的干预研究。

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1288776
Yara H Abdelgawad, Madiha Said Abd El Razik, Doa'a A Saleh, Manal H Abuelela, Marwa Rashad Salem
{"title":"推广卫生信息系统,为提高绩效的决策提供指导:埃及吉萨眼科研究所的干预研究。","authors":"Yara H Abdelgawad, Madiha Said Abd El Razik, Doa'a A Saleh, Manal H Abuelela, Marwa Rashad Salem","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1288776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to design and test a platform of key performance indicators (KPIs) and indices emphasizing achievements and improvement and helping decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An operations research study was designed to analyze data from the Hospital Management Information System (HMIS) from July 2017 to June 2018 at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology (RIO), Giza, Egypt. The HMIS data were submitted to reform covering parameters in service delivery and corresponding indicators and indices. Data were grouped into four themes: human resources and outpatient, inpatient, and surgical operations. A total of 14 performance indicators were deployed to four specific indices and total performance indices and applied to six teams of ophthalmologists at RIO. The decision matrices were deliberated to demonstrate achievements and provide recommendations for subsequent improvements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout 1 year, six teams of ophthalmologists (<i>n</i> = 222) at RIO provided the following services: outpatient (<i>n</i> = 116,043), inpatient (<i>n</i> = 8,081), and surgical operations (<i>n</i> = 9,174). Teams 2, 1, and 6 were the top teams in the total performance index. Team 4 had plunges in the outpatient index, and Team 5 faced limitations in the inpatient index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provided a model for upgrading the performance of the management information system (MIS) in health organizations. The KPIs and indices were used not only for documenting successful models of efficient service delivery but also as examples of limitations for further support and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting health information system in guiding decisions for improving performance: an intervention study at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"Yara H Abdelgawad, Madiha Said Abd El Razik, Doa'a A Saleh, Manal H Abuelela, Marwa Rashad Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1288776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to design and test a platform of key performance indicators (KPIs) and indices emphasizing achievements and improvement and helping decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An operations research study was designed to analyze data from the Hospital Management Information System (HMIS) from July 2017 to June 2018 at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology (RIO), Giza, Egypt. The HMIS data were submitted to reform covering parameters in service delivery and corresponding indicators and indices. Data were grouped into four themes: human resources and outpatient, inpatient, and surgical operations. A total of 14 performance indicators were deployed to four specific indices and total performance indices and applied to six teams of ophthalmologists at RIO. The decision matrices were deliberated to demonstrate achievements and provide recommendations for subsequent improvements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout 1 year, six teams of ophthalmologists (<i>n</i> = 222) at RIO provided the following services: outpatient (<i>n</i> = 116,043), inpatient (<i>n</i> = 8,081), and surgical operations (<i>n</i> = 9,174). Teams 2, 1, and 6 were the top teams in the total performance index. Team 4 had plunges in the outpatient index, and Team 5 faced limitations in the inpatient index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provided a model for upgrading the performance of the management information system (MIS) in health organizations. The KPIs and indices were used not only for documenting successful models of efficient service delivery but also as examples of limitations for further support and interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1288776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1288776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在设计和测试一个关键绩效指标(KPIs)和指数平台,强调成就和改进,帮助决策:本研究旨在设计和测试一个关键绩效指标(KPI)和指数平台,强调成就和改进,帮助决策:设计了一项运筹学研究,分析埃及吉萨眼科研究所(RIO)2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月期间医院管理信息系统(HMIS)的数据。提交的 HMIS 数据涵盖了服务提供方面的参数以及相应的指标和指数。数据分为四个主题:人力资源、门诊、住院和手术操作。共有 14 个绩效指标被分配到四个具体指数和总绩效指数中,并应用于 RIO 的六个眼科医生团队。对决策矩阵进行了讨论,以展示取得的成绩,并为后续改进提供建议:在一年时间里,里约热内卢研究所的六个眼科医生团队(n = 222)提供了以下服务:门诊(n = 116 043)、住院(n = 8 081)和手术(n = 9 174)。第 2、第 1 和第 6 小组在总绩效指数方面名列前茅。结论:本研究为提升医疗机构管理信息系统(MIS)的绩效提供了一个模型。关键绩效指标和指数不仅可用于记录高效提供服务的成功模式,还可作为限制进一步支持和干预的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting health information system in guiding decisions for improving performance: an intervention study at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt.

Objectives: This study aims to design and test a platform of key performance indicators (KPIs) and indices emphasizing achievements and improvement and helping decision-making.

Methods: An operations research study was designed to analyze data from the Hospital Management Information System (HMIS) from July 2017 to June 2018 at the Research Institute of Ophthalmology (RIO), Giza, Egypt. The HMIS data were submitted to reform covering parameters in service delivery and corresponding indicators and indices. Data were grouped into four themes: human resources and outpatient, inpatient, and surgical operations. A total of 14 performance indicators were deployed to four specific indices and total performance indices and applied to six teams of ophthalmologists at RIO. The decision matrices were deliberated to demonstrate achievements and provide recommendations for subsequent improvements.

Results: Throughout 1 year, six teams of ophthalmologists (n = 222) at RIO provided the following services: outpatient (n = 116,043), inpatient (n = 8,081), and surgical operations (n = 9,174). Teams 2, 1, and 6 were the top teams in the total performance index. Team 4 had plunges in the outpatient index, and Team 5 faced limitations in the inpatient index.

Conclusion: The study provided a model for upgrading the performance of the management information system (MIS) in health organizations. The KPIs and indices were used not only for documenting successful models of efficient service delivery but also as examples of limitations for further support and interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信