沙特阿拉伯卒中康复中使用标准化结果测量的障碍和促进因素:神经物理治疗师实践的横断面研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S466602
Norah A Alhwoaimel, Bader A Alqahtani, Ahmed S Alhowimel, Mohammed M Alshehri, Afrah K Alhelal, Lujain G Al-Assaf, Aqeel M Alenazi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯卒中康复中使用标准化结果测量的障碍和促进因素:神经物理治疗师实践的横断面研究。","authors":"Norah A Alhwoaimel, Bader A Alqahtani, Ahmed S Alhowimel, Mohammed M Alshehri, Afrah K Alhelal, Lujain G Al-Assaf, Aqeel M Alenazi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S466602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines emphasize the use of standardized outcome measures (SOMs) in post-stroke rehabilitation. However, the extent of SOM utilization among physiotherapists in this context in Saudi Arabia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>1) assess the current use of SOMs by physiotherapists involved in stroke rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia and 2) identify facilitators and barriers influencing the use of SOMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was administered using a three-section questionnaire designed for this study. The first section collected demographic data, the second evaluated the use of SOMs recommended by the American Physical Therapy Association, and the third explored factors facilitating or hindering SOM use in clinical practice. Only highly recommended outcome measures capturing the three levels of the International Classification of Functioning, and Disability (ICF) model were considered: body structure and function, activities, and participation. Poisson regression analysis was used to investigate the association between SOMs utilization and educational level, work experience, type of work facility, and the number of patients treated per week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 physiotherapists responded. Most participants (98.5%) used at least one outcome measure in clinical practice. Regression analysis showed that number of strokes treated per week and facility type were associated with the likelihood of using higher number of SOMs. Physiotherapists managing more than 10 stroke patients per week and working in private sector had significantly higher odds of using a greater number of SOMs. The most pronounced barriers were time restrictions and limited resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists working with stroke patients in Saudi Arabia demonstrate a high awareness and positive attitude toward SOM utilization. Addressing barriers such as time management and resource allocation is crucial to enhancing SOM integration in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Organizational support in terms of adequate time and resources is needed to enhance the use of SOMs among physiotherapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators of Using Standardized Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study of Practice Among Neurophysiotherapists.\",\"authors\":\"Norah A Alhwoaimel, Bader A Alqahtani, Ahmed S Alhowimel, Mohammed M Alshehri, Afrah K Alhelal, Lujain G Al-Assaf, Aqeel M Alenazi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S466602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines emphasize the use of standardized outcome measures (SOMs) in post-stroke rehabilitation. However, the extent of SOM utilization among physiotherapists in this context in Saudi Arabia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>1) assess the current use of SOMs by physiotherapists involved in stroke rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia and 2) identify facilitators and barriers influencing the use of SOMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was administered using a three-section questionnaire designed for this study. The first section collected demographic data, the second evaluated the use of SOMs recommended by the American Physical Therapy Association, and the third explored factors facilitating or hindering SOM use in clinical practice. Only highly recommended outcome measures capturing the three levels of the International Classification of Functioning, and Disability (ICF) model were considered: body structure and function, activities, and participation. Poisson regression analysis was used to investigate the association between SOMs utilization and educational level, work experience, type of work facility, and the number of patients treated per week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 physiotherapists responded. Most participants (98.5%) used at least one outcome measure in clinical practice. Regression analysis showed that number of strokes treated per week and facility type were associated with the likelihood of using higher number of SOMs. Physiotherapists managing more than 10 stroke patients per week and working in private sector had significantly higher odds of using a greater number of SOMs. The most pronounced barriers were time restrictions and limited resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists working with stroke patients in Saudi Arabia demonstrate a high awareness and positive attitude toward SOM utilization. Addressing barriers such as time management and resource allocation is crucial to enhancing SOM integration in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Organizational support in terms of adequate time and resources is needed to enhance the use of SOMs among physiotherapists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446603/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S466602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S466602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床指南强调在中风后康复中使用标准化结果测量(SOMs)。目的:1)评估沙特阿拉伯参与中风康复的物理治疗师目前使用标准化结果测量的情况;2)确定影响标准化结果测量使用的促进因素和障碍:采用专为本研究设计的三部分问卷进行在线调查。第一部分收集了人口统计学数据,第二部分评估了美国物理治疗协会推荐的SOM的使用情况,第三部分探讨了在临床实践中促进或阻碍SOM使用的因素。该部分只考虑了国际功能和残疾分类(ICF)模型中三个层次的高度推荐的结果测量:身体结构和功能、活动和参与。采用泊松回归分析法研究了SOMs的使用与教育水平、工作经验、工作机构类型以及每周治疗患者数量之间的关系:共有 138 名物理治疗师做出了回应。大多数参与者(98.5%)在临床实践中至少使用了一种结果测量方法。回归分析表明,每周治疗的中风人数和设施类型与使用较多 SOMs 的可能性有关。每周管理 10 名以上中风病人和在私营部门工作的物理治疗师使用更多 SOMs 的几率明显更高。最明显的障碍是时间限制和资源有限:在沙特阿拉伯,为中风患者提供治疗的物理治疗师对 SOM 的使用具有高度的认识和积极的态度。解决时间管理和资源分配等障碍对于加强 SOM 在临床实践中的整合至关重要:临床康复影响: 物理治疗师需要组织支持,提供充足的时间和资源,以加强对 SOM 的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Facilitators of Using Standardized Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study of Practice Among Neurophysiotherapists.

Background: Clinical guidelines emphasize the use of standardized outcome measures (SOMs) in post-stroke rehabilitation. However, the extent of SOM utilization among physiotherapists in this context in Saudi Arabia remains unclear.

Aim: 1) assess the current use of SOMs by physiotherapists involved in stroke rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia and 2) identify facilitators and barriers influencing the use of SOMs.

Methods: An online survey was administered using a three-section questionnaire designed for this study. The first section collected demographic data, the second evaluated the use of SOMs recommended by the American Physical Therapy Association, and the third explored factors facilitating or hindering SOM use in clinical practice. Only highly recommended outcome measures capturing the three levels of the International Classification of Functioning, and Disability (ICF) model were considered: body structure and function, activities, and participation. Poisson regression analysis was used to investigate the association between SOMs utilization and educational level, work experience, type of work facility, and the number of patients treated per week.

Results: A total of 138 physiotherapists responded. Most participants (98.5%) used at least one outcome measure in clinical practice. Regression analysis showed that number of strokes treated per week and facility type were associated with the likelihood of using higher number of SOMs. Physiotherapists managing more than 10 stroke patients per week and working in private sector had significantly higher odds of using a greater number of SOMs. The most pronounced barriers were time restrictions and limited resources.

Conclusion: Physiotherapists working with stroke patients in Saudi Arabia demonstrate a high awareness and positive attitude toward SOM utilization. Addressing barriers such as time management and resource allocation is crucial to enhancing SOM integration in clinical practice.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Organizational support in terms of adequate time and resources is needed to enhance the use of SOMs among physiotherapists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信