Mu-Han Lin PhD , Lindsey Olsen PhD , James A. Kavanaugh PhD , Dustin Jacqmin PhD , Eric Lobb MS , Sua Yoo PhD , Sean L. Berry PhD , Jose C. Pichardo PhD , Carlos E. Cardenas PhD , Justin Roper PhD , Maura Kirk MS , Stephanie Bennett PhD , Joey P. Cheung PhD , Timothy D. Solberg PhD , Kevin L. Moore PhD , Minsun Kim PhD
{"title":"通过计划质量审查检查确保高质量的治疗计划:计划质量审查核对表。","authors":"Mu-Han Lin PhD , Lindsey Olsen PhD , James A. Kavanaugh PhD , Dustin Jacqmin PhD , Eric Lobb MS , Sua Yoo PhD , Sean L. Berry PhD , Jose C. Pichardo PhD , Carlos E. Cardenas PhD , Justin Roper PhD , Maura Kirk MS , Stephanie Bennett PhD , Joey P. Cheung PhD , Timothy D. Solberg PhD , Kevin L. Moore PhD , Minsun Kim PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Treatment plan quality is a crucial component for a successful outcome of radiation therapy treatments. As the complexity of radiation therapy planning and delivery techniques increases, the role of the medical physicist in assessing treatment plan quality becomes more critical. Integrating plan quality review throughout the treatment planning process allows improvements without delaying treatment or rushing to produce changes at the last minute. In this work, we aim to provide practical check items for physicists to reference when assessing treatment plan quality with a critical eye, asking questions such as “is this the best dose distribution feasible for this patient?,” “could we change any planning parameters to improve plan quality?,” and “could we change the planning strategy for this particular patient or for future patients?”; and to work with planners and physicians to create a multidisciplinary collaborative culture that achieves the best plan feasible for every patient. We tabulate the features that affect plan quality in each process step and check details for individual items. This report is aimed at medical physicists, planners, radiation oncologists, and other professionals who are involved in treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages e82-e87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensuring High Quality Treatment Plans with a Plan Quality Review Checklist\",\"authors\":\"Mu-Han Lin PhD , Lindsey Olsen PhD , James A. Kavanaugh PhD , Dustin Jacqmin PhD , Eric Lobb MS , Sua Yoo PhD , Sean L. Berry PhD , Jose C. Pichardo PhD , Carlos E. Cardenas PhD , Justin Roper PhD , Maura Kirk MS , Stephanie Bennett PhD , Joey P. Cheung PhD , Timothy D. Solberg PhD , Kevin L. Moore PhD , Minsun Kim PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Treatment plan quality is a crucial component for a successful outcome of radiation therapy treatments. As the complexity of radiation therapy planning and delivery techniques increases, the role of the medical physicist in assessing treatment plan quality becomes more critical. Integrating plan quality review throughout the treatment planning process allows improvements without delaying treatment or rushing to produce changes at the last minute. In this work, we aim to provide practical check items for physicists to reference when assessing treatment plan quality with a critical eye, asking questions such as “is this the best dose distribution feasible for this patient?,” “could we change any planning parameters to improve plan quality?,” and “could we change the planning strategy for this particular patient or for future patients?”; and to work with planners and physicians to create a multidisciplinary collaborative culture that achieves the best plan feasible for every patient. We tabulate the features that affect plan quality in each process step and check details for individual items. This report is aimed at medical physicists, planners, radiation oncologists, and other professionals who are involved in treatment planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e82-e87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024002182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024002182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ensuring High Quality Treatment Plans with a Plan Quality Review Checklist
Treatment plan quality is a crucial component for a successful outcome of radiation therapy treatments. As the complexity of radiation therapy planning and delivery techniques increases, the role of the medical physicist in assessing treatment plan quality becomes more critical. Integrating plan quality review throughout the treatment planning process allows improvements without delaying treatment or rushing to produce changes at the last minute. In this work, we aim to provide practical check items for physicists to reference when assessing treatment plan quality with a critical eye, asking questions such as “is this the best dose distribution feasible for this patient?,” “could we change any planning parameters to improve plan quality?,” and “could we change the planning strategy for this particular patient or for future patients?”; and to work with planners and physicians to create a multidisciplinary collaborative culture that achieves the best plan feasible for every patient. We tabulate the features that affect plan quality in each process step and check details for individual items. This report is aimed at medical physicists, planners, radiation oncologists, and other professionals who are involved in treatment planning.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.