在比较核形态学研究中,不同的观察者会带来不可忽视的偏差。

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Comparative Cytogenetics Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172
Lorenzo Peruzzi, Jacopo Franzoni, Manuel Tiburtini, Emanuela Abidi, Emiliano Alù, Giulio Barone, Elisabetta Bianchi, Chiara Cataudella, Emanuela Di Iorio, Maria Guerrina, Fabio Mondello, Luca Paino, Mario Pentassuglia, Manuela Porrovecchio, Giovanni Rivieccio, Eugenia Siccardi, Adriano Stinca, Alessio Tei, Virginia Volanti, Antonio Giacò
{"title":"在比较核形态学研究中,不同的观察者会带来不可忽视的偏差。","authors":"Lorenzo Peruzzi, Jacopo Franzoni, Manuel Tiburtini, Emanuela Abidi, Emiliano Alù, Giulio Barone, Elisabetta Bianchi, Chiara Cataudella, Emanuela Di Iorio, Maria Guerrina, Fabio Mondello, Luca Paino, Mario Pentassuglia, Manuela Porrovecchio, Giovanni Rivieccio, Eugenia Siccardi, Adriano Stinca, Alessio Tei, Virginia Volanti, Antonio Giacò","doi":"10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether using image analysis softwares possible biases are still introduced by different observers. We conclude that observer bias selectively applies in possibly overestimating the length of short arms in a karyotype. As a consequence, the parameters most sensitive to these possible errors are CV<sub>CI</sub> and CV<sub>CL</sub>, and to a less degree M<sub>CA</sub> and THL. To achieve more stable results among observers, a still lacking standardized measurement protocol could be helpful.</p>","PeriodicalId":50656,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Cytogenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Peruzzi, Jacopo Franzoni, Manuel Tiburtini, Emanuela Abidi, Emiliano Alù, Giulio Barone, Elisabetta Bianchi, Chiara Cataudella, Emanuela Di Iorio, Maria Guerrina, Fabio Mondello, Luca Paino, Mario Pentassuglia, Manuela Porrovecchio, Giovanni Rivieccio, Eugenia Siccardi, Adriano Stinca, Alessio Tei, Virginia Volanti, Antonio Giacò\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether using image analysis softwares possible biases are still introduced by different observers. We conclude that observer bias selectively applies in possibly overestimating the length of short arms in a karyotype. As a consequence, the parameters most sensitive to these possible errors are CV<sub>CI</sub> and CV<sub>CL</sub>, and to a less degree M<sub>CA</sub> and THL. To achieve more stable results among observers, a still lacking standardized measurement protocol could be helpful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Cytogenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445605/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Cytogenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Cytogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意大利植物学会花卉学、系统学和进化小组于 2024 年 2 月在比萨(意大利)举办了细胞分类学实践课程,我们在该课程中测试了不同观察者使用图像分析软件是否仍会产生偏差。我们的结论是,观察者的偏差可能会选择性地高估核型中短臂的长度。因此,对这些可能误差最敏感的参数是 CVCI 和 CVCL,其次是 MCA 和 THL。为了在观察者之间获得更稳定的结果,仍然缺乏的标准化测量协议可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies.

Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether using image analysis softwares possible biases are still introduced by different observers. We conclude that observer bias selectively applies in possibly overestimating the length of short arms in a karyotype. As a consequence, the parameters most sensitive to these possible errors are CVCI and CVCL, and to a less degree MCA and THL. To achieve more stable results among observers, a still lacking standardized measurement protocol could be helpful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Cytogenetics
Comparative Cytogenetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Comparative Cytogenetics is a peer-reviewed, open-access, rapid online journal launched to accelerate research on all aspects of plant and animal cytogenetics, karyosystematics, and molecular systematics. All published papers can be freely copied, downloaded, printed and distributed at no charge for the reader. Authors are thus encouraged to post the pdf files of published papers on their homepages or elsewhere to expedite distribution. There is no charge for color.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信