氯胺酮/艾司他敏在临床环境中治疗躁郁症的有效性和安全性。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Mia C Santucci, Mina Ansari, Sina Nikayin, Rajiv Radhakrishnan, Taeho G Rhee, Samuel T Wilkinson
{"title":"氯胺酮/艾司他敏在临床环境中治疗躁郁症的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Mia C Santucci, Mina Ansari, Sina Nikayin, Rajiv Radhakrishnan, Taeho G Rhee, Samuel T Wilkinson","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bipolar disorder represents a significant source of morbidity and elevated mortality risk. Ketamine has emerged as a powerful antidepressant; however, there have been few trials of ketamine in bipolar depression and no trials with esketamine in bipolar depression, and few data exist from real-world settings. Here, we report outcomes from a cohort of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/ esketamine in a real-world setting.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with treatment refractory bipolar depression were referred to Yale Psychiatric Hospital Interventional Services for treatment from October 2014 to November 2023. Appropriate patients were treated with intravenous (IV) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes) or intranasal esketamine (56 or 84 mg). Diagnosis of bipolar depression was done by clinical evaluation by an attending psychiatrist, based on <i>DSM</i> criteria. Clinical outcomes were tabulated from medical records.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, 45 patients with bipolar depression were treated with IV ketamine or intranasal (IN) esketamine during the time period specified. Depression severity outcomes were available for 38 patients that completed an acute series, defined as treatment twice weekly for up to 4 weeks. Overall, 15/38 (39%) achieved clinical response (≥50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and 5/38 (13.2%) achieved remission (≤10 on MADRS) following the acute series. Mean MADRS scores decreased from 31.1 to 19.2 (38.3% mean improvement). Safety data (hypomania/manic symptoms) were available for all 45 patients (518 patient-months of follow-up). No patients experienced any mania/hypomania during the acute series phase (when treatments are given twice weekly). However, 13/45 (28.9%) patients experienced symptoms consistent with a hypomanic or manic episode at some point following the acute phase while continuing to receive ketamine or esketamine during a maintenance phase. There were 16 manic/hypomanic events, indicating 1 event for every 2.7 patient-years. Only 1 event was severe and resulted in hospitalization.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> In a small sample of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/esketamine, no evidence of mania/hypomania was seen during the acute phase of treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate whether ketamine or esketamine confers heightened risk of affective switch during maintenance treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Mia C Santucci, Mina Ansari, Sina Nikayin, Rajiv Radhakrishnan, Taeho G Rhee, Samuel T Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.4088/JCP.24m15376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bipolar disorder represents a significant source of morbidity and elevated mortality risk. Ketamine has emerged as a powerful antidepressant; however, there have been few trials of ketamine in bipolar depression and no trials with esketamine in bipolar depression, and few data exist from real-world settings. Here, we report outcomes from a cohort of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/ esketamine in a real-world setting.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with treatment refractory bipolar depression were referred to Yale Psychiatric Hospital Interventional Services for treatment from October 2014 to November 2023. Appropriate patients were treated with intravenous (IV) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes) or intranasal esketamine (56 or 84 mg). Diagnosis of bipolar depression was done by clinical evaluation by an attending psychiatrist, based on <i>DSM</i> criteria. Clinical outcomes were tabulated from medical records.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Overall, 45 patients with bipolar depression were treated with IV ketamine or intranasal (IN) esketamine during the time period specified. Depression severity outcomes were available for 38 patients that completed an acute series, defined as treatment twice weekly for up to 4 weeks. Overall, 15/38 (39%) achieved clinical response (≥50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and 5/38 (13.2%) achieved remission (≤10 on MADRS) following the acute series. Mean MADRS scores decreased from 31.1 to 19.2 (38.3% mean improvement). Safety data (hypomania/manic symptoms) were available for all 45 patients (518 patient-months of follow-up). No patients experienced any mania/hypomania during the acute series phase (when treatments are given twice weekly). However, 13/45 (28.9%) patients experienced symptoms consistent with a hypomanic or manic episode at some point following the acute phase while continuing to receive ketamine or esketamine during a maintenance phase. There were 16 manic/hypomanic events, indicating 1 event for every 2.7 patient-years. Only 1 event was severe and resulted in hospitalization.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> In a small sample of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/esketamine, no evidence of mania/hypomania was seen during the acute phase of treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate whether ketamine or esketamine confers heightened risk of affective switch during maintenance treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:躁郁症是发病率和死亡风险升高的重要原因。氯胺酮已成为一种强有力的抗抑郁药物;然而,氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁症的试验很少,使用埃斯氯胺酮治疗双相抑郁症的试验也没有,而且来自真实世界的数据也很少。在此,我们报告了一组在真实世界环境中接受氯胺酮/艾司氯胺酮治疗的双相抑郁症患者的疗效:方法:2014 年 10 月至 2023 年 11 月期间,难治性双相抑郁症患者被转诊至耶鲁大学精神病医院介入服务部接受治疗。合适的患者接受了静脉注射氯胺酮(0.5 毫克/千克,40 分钟)或鼻内注射艾司氯胺酮(56 或 84 毫克)治疗。双相抑郁症的诊断由精神科主治医生根据 DSM 标准进行临床评估。临床结果根据医疗记录制成表格:在规定时间内,共有 45 名双相抑郁症患者接受了氯胺酮静脉注射或伊曲康胺鼻内注射治疗。38名完成急性系列治疗的患者获得了抑郁严重程度的结果,急性系列治疗的定义是每周治疗两次,最多持续4周。总体而言,在急性系列治疗后,15/38(39%)的患者获得了临床反应(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评分量表[MADRS]改善≥50%),5/38(13.2%)的患者获得了缓解(MADRS评分≤10)。MADRS平均评分从31.1分降至19.2分(平均改善率为38.3%)。所有 45 名患者(随访 518 个月)的安全性数据(躁狂症/狂躁症状)均可获得。在急性系列治疗阶段(每周治疗两次),没有患者出现狂躁/躁狂症状。然而,13/45(28.9%)名患者在急性期后的某个阶段出现了与躁狂症或狂躁症发作相一致的症状,同时在维持治疗阶段继续接受氯胺酮或伊斯氯胺酮治疗。共发生了 16 起躁狂/狂躁症事件,即每 2.7 患者年发生 1 起事件。只有1起事件较为严重,导致患者住院治疗:结论:在接受氯胺酮/伊斯坎胺治疗的小样本双相抑郁症患者中,急性治疗阶段未发现躁狂/狂躁症的证据。还需要进一步研究,以评估氯胺酮或伊斯氯胺酮是否会增加维持治疗期间情感转换的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine/Esketamine in Bipolar Depression in a Clinical Setting.

Background: Bipolar disorder represents a significant source of morbidity and elevated mortality risk. Ketamine has emerged as a powerful antidepressant; however, there have been few trials of ketamine in bipolar depression and no trials with esketamine in bipolar depression, and few data exist from real-world settings. Here, we report outcomes from a cohort of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/ esketamine in a real-world setting.

Methods: Patients with treatment refractory bipolar depression were referred to Yale Psychiatric Hospital Interventional Services for treatment from October 2014 to November 2023. Appropriate patients were treated with intravenous (IV) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes) or intranasal esketamine (56 or 84 mg). Diagnosis of bipolar depression was done by clinical evaluation by an attending psychiatrist, based on DSM criteria. Clinical outcomes were tabulated from medical records.

Results: Overall, 45 patients with bipolar depression were treated with IV ketamine or intranasal (IN) esketamine during the time period specified. Depression severity outcomes were available for 38 patients that completed an acute series, defined as treatment twice weekly for up to 4 weeks. Overall, 15/38 (39%) achieved clinical response (≥50% improvement on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and 5/38 (13.2%) achieved remission (≤10 on MADRS) following the acute series. Mean MADRS scores decreased from 31.1 to 19.2 (38.3% mean improvement). Safety data (hypomania/manic symptoms) were available for all 45 patients (518 patient-months of follow-up). No patients experienced any mania/hypomania during the acute series phase (when treatments are given twice weekly). However, 13/45 (28.9%) patients experienced symptoms consistent with a hypomanic or manic episode at some point following the acute phase while continuing to receive ketamine or esketamine during a maintenance phase. There were 16 manic/hypomanic events, indicating 1 event for every 2.7 patient-years. Only 1 event was severe and resulted in hospitalization.

Conclusion: In a small sample of patients with bipolar depression treated with ketamine/esketamine, no evidence of mania/hypomania was seen during the acute phase of treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate whether ketamine or esketamine confers heightened risk of affective switch during maintenance treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信