呼气流量限制发展指数 (ELDI):评估慢性阻塞性肺病呼吸力学的新方法。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
James Dean, Stephen J Fowler, Dave Singh, Augusta Beech
{"title":"呼气流量限制发展指数 (ELDI):评估慢性阻塞性肺病呼吸力学的新方法。","authors":"James Dean, Stephen J Fowler, Dave Singh, Augusta Beech","doi":"10.1186/s12931-024-02972-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can be detected using oscillometric reactance and is associated with a worse clinical presentation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reactance can show negative swings upon exhalation, which may develop at different rates between patients. We propose a new method to quantify the rate of EFL development; the EFL Development Index (ELDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data from 124 COPD patients was performed. Data included lung function tests, Impulse Oscillometry (IOS), St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Fifty four patients had repeat data after 6 months. Twenty two patients had data recorded after 5 days of treatment with long acting bronchodilator therapy. EDLI was calculated as the mean expiratory reactance divided by the minimum expiratory reactance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ELDI was used to categorise patients with rapid onset of EFL (> 0.63; n = 29) or gradual onset (≤ 0.63; n = 34). Those with rapid development had worse airflow obstruction, lower quality of life scores, and greater resting hyperinflation, compared to those with gradual development. In patients with EFL, ELDI correlated with symptoms scores, airflow obstruction, lung volumes and gas diffusion. Both EFL and ELDI were stable over 6 months. EFL and EDLI improved with bronchodilator treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COPD patients with rapid EFL development (determined by ELDI) had worse clinical characteristics than those with gradual EFL development. The rate of EFL development appears to be associated with clinical and physiological characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"357"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expiratory flow limitation development index (ELDI): a novel method of assessing respiratory mechanics in COPD.\",\"authors\":\"James Dean, Stephen J Fowler, Dave Singh, Augusta Beech\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-024-02972-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can be detected using oscillometric reactance and is associated with a worse clinical presentation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reactance can show negative swings upon exhalation, which may develop at different rates between patients. We propose a new method to quantify the rate of EFL development; the EFL Development Index (ELDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data from 124 COPD patients was performed. Data included lung function tests, Impulse Oscillometry (IOS), St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Fifty four patients had repeat data after 6 months. Twenty two patients had data recorded after 5 days of treatment with long acting bronchodilator therapy. EDLI was calculated as the mean expiratory reactance divided by the minimum expiratory reactance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ELDI was used to categorise patients with rapid onset of EFL (> 0.63; n = 29) or gradual onset (≤ 0.63; n = 34). Those with rapid development had worse airflow obstruction, lower quality of life scores, and greater resting hyperinflation, compared to those with gradual development. In patients with EFL, ELDI correlated with symptoms scores, airflow obstruction, lung volumes and gas diffusion. Both EFL and ELDI were stable over 6 months. EFL and EDLI improved with bronchodilator treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COPD patients with rapid EFL development (determined by ELDI) had worse clinical characteristics than those with gradual EFL development. The rate of EFL development appears to be associated with clinical and physiological characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02972-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02972-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼气流量限制(EFL)可通过振荡电抗检测出来,它与慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的临床表现恶化有关。呼气时电抗会出现负摆动,不同患者的发展速度可能不同。我们提出了一种量化 EFL 发展速度的新方法:EFL 发展指数 (ELDI):我们对 124 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。数据包括肺功能测试、脉冲振荡计(IOS)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、改良医学研究委员会(mMRC)量表和慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)评分。54 名患者在 6 个月后重复获得了数据。22 名患者在接受长效支气管扩张剂治疗 5 天后记录了数据。EDLI的计算方法是平均呼气反应量除以最小呼气反应量:用平均呼气反应指数将患者分为快速发病(> 0.63;n = 29)和逐渐发病(≤ 0.63;n = 34)两类。与逐渐发展的患者相比,快速发展的患者气流阻塞更严重,生活质量评分更低,静息过度充气更严重。在EFL患者中,ELDI与症状评分、气流阻塞、肺容积和气体扩散相关。EFL 和 ELDI 在 6 个月内保持稳定。EFL和EDLI在支气管扩张剂治疗后有所改善:结论:EFL发展迅速(由ELDI决定)的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床特征比EFL逐渐发展的患者更差。EFL的发展速度似乎与临床和生理特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expiratory flow limitation development index (ELDI): a novel method of assessing respiratory mechanics in COPD.

Background: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can be detected using oscillometric reactance and is associated with a worse clinical presentation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reactance can show negative swings upon exhalation, which may develop at different rates between patients. We propose a new method to quantify the rate of EFL development; the EFL Development Index (ELDI).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from 124 COPD patients was performed. Data included lung function tests, Impulse Oscillometry (IOS), St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Fifty four patients had repeat data after 6 months. Twenty two patients had data recorded after 5 days of treatment with long acting bronchodilator therapy. EDLI was calculated as the mean expiratory reactance divided by the minimum expiratory reactance.

Results: The mean ELDI was used to categorise patients with rapid onset of EFL (> 0.63; n = 29) or gradual onset (≤ 0.63; n = 34). Those with rapid development had worse airflow obstruction, lower quality of life scores, and greater resting hyperinflation, compared to those with gradual development. In patients with EFL, ELDI correlated with symptoms scores, airflow obstruction, lung volumes and gas diffusion. Both EFL and ELDI were stable over 6 months. EFL and EDLI improved with bronchodilator treatment.

Conclusions: COPD patients with rapid EFL development (determined by ELDI) had worse clinical characteristics than those with gradual EFL development. The rate of EFL development appears to be associated with clinical and physiological characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信