语言病理学中经过验证的患者报告结果测量:成人实践范围审查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Danielle Gardner, Verity Mitchell, Thuy Frakking, Kelly Ann Weir, Angie Canning, Rachel Jane Wenke
{"title":"语言病理学中经过验证的患者报告结果测量:成人实践范围审查。","authors":"Danielle Gardner, Verity Mitchell, Thuy Frakking, Kelly Ann Weir, Angie Canning, Rachel Jane Wenke","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2024.2399236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform value-based healthcare. Within speech-language pathology (SLP), there is no synthesis of validated PROMs to guide professional practice. This scoping review systematically identifies and evaluates condition-specific PROMs across adult SLP practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature search was performed to identify studies published until 18th February 2022 from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science. Abstracts and full texts were screened in Covidence. Relevant studies that validated PROMs in English were extracted and assessed using the \"Checklist to operationalise measurement characteristics of PROMs\" by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ninety-seven articles provided validation data for 71 PROMS across seven SLP practice areas. These included voice (<i>n</i> = 18), swallowing (<i>n</i> = 14), language (<i>n</i> = 11), fluency (<i>n</i> = 8), speech (<i>n</i> = 4), laryngectomy (<i>n</i> = 3), and cognitive-communication (<i>n</i> = 2). No PROMs were identified for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) (<i>n</i> = 0). Quality ratings were variable on the Francis et al. checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A range of validated PROMs were identified to guide SLP practice in measuring patient perceptions across a range of practice areas in adults. Opportunities for further development in SLP practice areas with limited PROMs, such as speech, cognitive-communication, and AAC are also highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validated patient reported outcome measures in speech-language pathology: A scoping review of adult practice.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Gardner, Verity Mitchell, Thuy Frakking, Kelly Ann Weir, Angie Canning, Rachel Jane Wenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17549507.2024.2399236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform value-based healthcare. Within speech-language pathology (SLP), there is no synthesis of validated PROMs to guide professional practice. This scoping review systematically identifies and evaluates condition-specific PROMs across adult SLP practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature search was performed to identify studies published until 18th February 2022 from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science. Abstracts and full texts were screened in Covidence. Relevant studies that validated PROMs in English were extracted and assessed using the \\\"Checklist to operationalise measurement characteristics of PROMs\\\" by two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ninety-seven articles provided validation data for 71 PROMS across seven SLP practice areas. These included voice (<i>n</i> = 18), swallowing (<i>n</i> = 14), language (<i>n</i> = 11), fluency (<i>n</i> = 8), speech (<i>n</i> = 4), laryngectomy (<i>n</i> = 3), and cognitive-communication (<i>n</i> = 2). No PROMs were identified for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) (<i>n</i> = 0). Quality ratings were variable on the Francis et al. checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A range of validated PROMs were identified to guide SLP practice in measuring patient perceptions across a range of practice areas in adults. Opportunities for further development in SLP practice areas with limited PROMs, such as speech, cognitive-communication, and AAC are also highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2399236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2399236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者报告结果指标 (PROM) 越来越多地被用于为基于价值的医疗保健提供信息。在语言病理学(SLP)领域,还没有经过验证的 PROMs 综合指导专业实践。本范围综述系统地确定和评估了成人语言病理学实践中针对特定病症的 PROMs:方法:进行文献检索,从 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Scopus、Cochrane Collaboration 和 Web of Science 中找出 2022 年 2 月 18 日之前发表的研究。Covidence 对摘要和全文进行了筛选。由两名独立审稿人使用 "PROMs测量特征操作化核对表 "对验证英文PROMs的相关研究进行提取和评估:结果:97 篇文章提供了 7 个 SLP 实践领域中 71 个 PROMS 的验证数据。这些领域包括语音(n = 18)、吞咽(n = 14)、语言(n = 11)、流畅性(n = 8)、言语(n = 4)、喉切除(n = 3)和认知-交流(n = 2)。未发现用于辅助和替代性交流(AAC)的 PROMs(n = 0)。弗朗西斯等人的核对表上的质量评分不一:我们确定了一系列经过验证的 PROMs,用于指导 SLP 实践,测量成人患者在一系列实践领域中的感知。此外,还强调了在PROM有限的SLP实践领域(如言语、认知-沟通和AAC)进一步发展的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validated patient reported outcome measures in speech-language pathology: A scoping review of adult practice.

Purpose: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform value-based healthcare. Within speech-language pathology (SLP), there is no synthesis of validated PROMs to guide professional practice. This scoping review systematically identifies and evaluates condition-specific PROMs across adult SLP practice.

Method: A literature search was performed to identify studies published until 18th February 2022 from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science. Abstracts and full texts were screened in Covidence. Relevant studies that validated PROMs in English were extracted and assessed using the "Checklist to operationalise measurement characteristics of PROMs" by two independent reviewers.

Result: Ninety-seven articles provided validation data for 71 PROMS across seven SLP practice areas. These included voice (n = 18), swallowing (n = 14), language (n = 11), fluency (n = 8), speech (n = 4), laryngectomy (n = 3), and cognitive-communication (n = 2). No PROMs were identified for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) (n = 0). Quality ratings were variable on the Francis et al. checklist.

Conclusion: A range of validated PROMs were identified to guide SLP practice in measuring patient perceptions across a range of practice areas in adults. Opportunities for further development in SLP practice areas with limited PROMs, such as speech, cognitive-communication, and AAC are also highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信