你怀孕了吗?如果没有,为什么没有?":人工生殖技术与不孕症的创伤。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Soumya Kashyap, Priyanka Tripathi
{"title":"你怀孕了吗?如果没有,为什么没有?\":人工生殖技术与不孕症的创伤。","authors":"Soumya Kashyap, Priyanka Tripathi","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2023-012690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, <i>what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina</i> (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Are you pregnant? If not, why not?': artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility.\",\"authors\":\"Soumya Kashyap, Priyanka Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2023-012690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, <i>what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina</i> (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012690\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章仔细研究了罗希尼-S-拉贾戈帕尔(Rohini S. Rajagopal)的作品《柠檬榨汁机在我的阴道里做什么》(2021 年),以说明不孕不育身体医疗化的不断升级。在生殖问题被视为需要治疗和监控的医学疾病的文化背景下,医疗专业人员和制药公司利用这些社会文化动态,通过辅助生殖技术为不孕夫妇提供直接的解决方案。因此,本研究为医学人文领域贡献了一个批判性视角,发起了一场细致入微的讨论,质疑 "活体实验室"、"婴儿机器"、"母亲机器 "和 "希望技术 "等术语对我们理解未来母亲身份的影响。文章借鉴了女权主义对医疗化的批判,认为生物技术延续了十八世纪生物医学的隐喻,即身体是一台可更换部件的机器。值得注意的是,当代生殖医学的进步允许替换被认为 "有缺陷 "的身体部位,从而在这一框架内进一步将其物化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Are you pregnant? If not, why not?': artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility.

The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信