Samuel J Gentle, Charli Cohen, Waldemar A Carlo, Lindy Winter, Madhura Hallman
{"title":"缩短有创通气早产儿的护理目标讨论时间。","authors":"Samuel J Gentle, Charli Cohen, Waldemar A Carlo, Lindy Winter, Madhura Hallman","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The challenge of identifying preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) that need tracheostomy placement may delay goals of care (GOC) discussions. By identifying infants with a low probability of ventilation liberation, timely GOC discussions may reduce the time to tracheostomy. Our SMART aim was to reduce the postmenstrual age (PMA) of GOC discussions by 20% in infants with BPD and prolonged invasive ventilatory requirement by October 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our group conducted a quality improvement initiative at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Infants were included if born at <32 weeks' gestation and exposed to invasive ventilation for ≥2 weeks beyond 36 weeks' PMA. Interventions included (1) consensus of BPD infants at risk for tracheostomy dependence, (2) monthly multidisciplinary tracheostomy meetings, and (3) development and utilization of tracheostomy educational content for families. Statistical process control charts were used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 infants were included in analyses, of which 44 infants either received a tracheostomy or died. From X-mR control chart analysis, there was special cause variation in the time to GOC discussions, which decreased from 62 to 51 weeks' PMA related to monthly multidisciplinary conferences. The average PMA at tracheostomy decreased from 80 weeks to 63 weeks with no change in the frequency of tracheostomy placement or discordant GOC discussions in which infants survived to hospital discharge without a tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In infants with ventilator-dependent BPD, standardization of GOC discussions reduced the PMA of GOC discussions and tracheostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Time to Goals of Care Discussions in Invasively Ventilated Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel J Gentle, Charli Cohen, Waldemar A Carlo, Lindy Winter, Madhura Hallman\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/peds.2024-066585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The challenge of identifying preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) that need tracheostomy placement may delay goals of care (GOC) discussions. By identifying infants with a low probability of ventilation liberation, timely GOC discussions may reduce the time to tracheostomy. Our SMART aim was to reduce the postmenstrual age (PMA) of GOC discussions by 20% in infants with BPD and prolonged invasive ventilatory requirement by October 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our group conducted a quality improvement initiative at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Infants were included if born at <32 weeks' gestation and exposed to invasive ventilation for ≥2 weeks beyond 36 weeks' PMA. Interventions included (1) consensus of BPD infants at risk for tracheostomy dependence, (2) monthly multidisciplinary tracheostomy meetings, and (3) development and utilization of tracheostomy educational content for families. Statistical process control charts were used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 infants were included in analyses, of which 44 infants either received a tracheostomy or died. From X-mR control chart analysis, there was special cause variation in the time to GOC discussions, which decreased from 62 to 51 weeks' PMA related to monthly multidisciplinary conferences. The average PMA at tracheostomy decreased from 80 weeks to 63 weeks with no change in the frequency of tracheostomy placement or discordant GOC discussions in which infants survived to hospital discharge without a tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In infants with ventilator-dependent BPD, standardization of GOC discussions reduced the PMA of GOC discussions and tracheostomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Time to Goals of Care Discussions in Invasively Ventilated Preterm Infants.
Background and objectives: The challenge of identifying preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) that need tracheostomy placement may delay goals of care (GOC) discussions. By identifying infants with a low probability of ventilation liberation, timely GOC discussions may reduce the time to tracheostomy. Our SMART aim was to reduce the postmenstrual age (PMA) of GOC discussions by 20% in infants with BPD and prolonged invasive ventilatory requirement by October 2020.
Methods: Our group conducted a quality improvement initiative at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Infants were included if born at <32 weeks' gestation and exposed to invasive ventilation for ≥2 weeks beyond 36 weeks' PMA. Interventions included (1) consensus of BPD infants at risk for tracheostomy dependence, (2) monthly multidisciplinary tracheostomy meetings, and (3) development and utilization of tracheostomy educational content for families. Statistical process control charts were used for all analyses.
Results: A total of 79 infants were included in analyses, of which 44 infants either received a tracheostomy or died. From X-mR control chart analysis, there was special cause variation in the time to GOC discussions, which decreased from 62 to 51 weeks' PMA related to monthly multidisciplinary conferences. The average PMA at tracheostomy decreased from 80 weeks to 63 weeks with no change in the frequency of tracheostomy placement or discordant GOC discussions in which infants survived to hospital discharge without a tracheostomy.
Conclusions: In infants with ventilator-dependent BPD, standardization of GOC discussions reduced the PMA of GOC discussions and tracheostomy.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.