内窥镜辅助下经宫颈切除咽旁间隙肿瘤。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Joshua D Smith, Steven B Chinn, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Molly E Heft-Neal, Matthew E Spector
{"title":"内窥镜辅助下经宫颈切除咽旁间隙肿瘤。","authors":"Joshua D Smith, Steven B Chinn, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Molly E Heft-Neal, Matthew E Spector","doi":"10.1002/ohn.976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe a novel technique for endoscope-assisted (EA) transcervical (TC) approach for resection of parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors and compare perioperative outcomes of this approach to standard TC approaches.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing TC approach for resection of PPS tumors over a 10-year period. We describe unique advantages of our surgical approach utilizing a 0° endoscope for improved surgical access, visualization, and efficiency. χ<sup>2</sup> and Student's t test were used to compare perioperative outcomes between cases in which an endoscope was utilized EA for resection versus standard TC approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 77 patients (n = 40 EA, n = 37 TC). There was no difference in patient age, sex, tumor laterality, tumor size, or tumor location between groups. The EA approach was associated with significantly shorter operative times (median [range] for EA 73 [33-270] minutes vs TC 112 [56-362] minutes, P < .01) and reduced rates of immediate postoperative marginal mandibular nerve paresis (EA: n = 5 [12.5%] vs TC: n = 16 [43.2%], P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EA TC approach for resection of PPS tumors offers improved surgical access and is associated with reduced surgical time and rates of marginal mandibular nerve paresis compared to standard transcervical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscope-Assisted Transcervical Resection of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D Smith, Steven B Chinn, Shaum Sridharan, Kevin J Contrera, Molly E Heft-Neal, Matthew E Spector\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe a novel technique for endoscope-assisted (EA) transcervical (TC) approach for resection of parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors and compare perioperative outcomes of this approach to standard TC approaches.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing TC approach for resection of PPS tumors over a 10-year period. We describe unique advantages of our surgical approach utilizing a 0° endoscope for improved surgical access, visualization, and efficiency. χ<sup>2</sup> and Student's t test were used to compare perioperative outcomes between cases in which an endoscope was utilized EA for resection versus standard TC approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 77 patients (n = 40 EA, n = 37 TC). There was no difference in patient age, sex, tumor laterality, tumor size, or tumor location between groups. The EA approach was associated with significantly shorter operative times (median [range] for EA 73 [33-270] minutes vs TC 112 [56-362] minutes, P < .01) and reduced rates of immediate postoperative marginal mandibular nerve paresis (EA: n = 5 [12.5%] vs TC: n = 16 [43.2%], P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EA TC approach for resection of PPS tumors offers improved surgical access and is associated with reduced surgical time and rates of marginal mandibular nerve paresis compared to standard transcervical approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.976\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们描述了一种新型内窥镜辅助(EA)经颈(TC)途径切除咽旁间隙(PPS)肿瘤的技术,并比较了这种途径与标准TC途径的围手术期结果:研究设计:回顾性病历审查:研究设计:回顾性病历审查:这是一项单一机构的回顾性分析,研究对象是十年间所有接受TC方法切除PPS肿瘤的患者。我们介绍了利用 0° 内窥镜改善手术入路、可视化和效率的手术方法的独特优势。我们使用χ2和学生t检验来比较使用EA内窥镜切除与标准TC方法的病例围手术期结果:我们的队列包括 77 名患者(n = 40 EA,n = 37 TC)。两组患者的年龄、性别、肿瘤侧位、肿瘤大小或肿瘤位置均无差异。EA方法的手术时间明显更短(中位数[范围]为EA 73 [33-270] 分钟 vs TC 112 [56-362] 分钟,P 结论:EA方法的手术时间明显更短(中位数[范围]为EA 73 [33-270] 分钟 vs TC 112 [56-362] 分钟):与标准的经颈椎入路相比,EA TC 入路切除 PPS 肿瘤可改善手术入路,缩短手术时间,降低下颌缘神经瘫痪率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscope-Assisted Transcervical Resection of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors.

Objective: We describe a novel technique for endoscope-assisted (EA) transcervical (TC) approach for resection of parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors and compare perioperative outcomes of this approach to standard TC approaches.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single tertiary care center.

Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing TC approach for resection of PPS tumors over a 10-year period. We describe unique advantages of our surgical approach utilizing a 0° endoscope for improved surgical access, visualization, and efficiency. χ2 and Student's t test were used to compare perioperative outcomes between cases in which an endoscope was utilized EA for resection versus standard TC approach.

Results: Our cohort included 77 patients (n = 40 EA, n = 37 TC). There was no difference in patient age, sex, tumor laterality, tumor size, or tumor location between groups. The EA approach was associated with significantly shorter operative times (median [range] for EA 73 [33-270] minutes vs TC 112 [56-362] minutes, P < .01) and reduced rates of immediate postoperative marginal mandibular nerve paresis (EA: n = 5 [12.5%] vs TC: n = 16 [43.2%], P < 0.01).

Conclusion: EA TC approach for resection of PPS tumors offers improved surgical access and is associated with reduced surgical time and rates of marginal mandibular nerve paresis compared to standard transcervical approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信