工作投入和工作狂与个人及其亲密伴侣的心理健康有何关系:印度尼西亚双职工夫妇的溢出-交叉模型试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fuad Hamsyah, Akihito Shimazu, Jari J Hakanen
{"title":"工作投入和工作狂与个人及其亲密伴侣的心理健康有何关系:印度尼西亚双职工夫妇的溢出-交叉模型试验。","authors":"Fuad Hamsyah, Akihito Shimazu, Jari J Hakanen","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2024-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between work engagement, workaholism, and mental well-being of individuals and their intimate partners. This association was explored in the context of Indonesian dual-earner couples, using the Spillover-Crossover Model (SCM). The study examined how work-to-family spillover (i.e. work-to-family conflict and facilitation) and recovery experiences (i.e. psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control) mediate these relationships. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 186 Indonesian dual-earner couples with preschool children. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized model and bootstrap method was conducted to evaluate the indirect relationships. As hypothesized, among male and female workers, work engagement was positively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and recovery experiences. In contrast, workaholism was negatively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family conflict and recovery experiences excluding psychological detachment. Individual's mental well-being, in turn, was positively related to intimate partner's mental well-being. These findings suggested that work engagement and workaholism were related to intimate partner's mental well-being differently. These results further supported the SCM, suggesting that higher work engagement could increase workers' and their intimate partners' mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and their recovery experiences, while workaholism acts oppositely.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How work engagement and workaholism relate to individuals' and their intimate partners' mental well-being: a test of the spillover-crossover model among Indonesian dual-earner couples.\",\"authors\":\"Fuad Hamsyah, Akihito Shimazu, Jari J Hakanen\",\"doi\":\"10.2486/indhealth.2024-0094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between work engagement, workaholism, and mental well-being of individuals and their intimate partners. This association was explored in the context of Indonesian dual-earner couples, using the Spillover-Crossover Model (SCM). The study examined how work-to-family spillover (i.e. work-to-family conflict and facilitation) and recovery experiences (i.e. psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control) mediate these relationships. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 186 Indonesian dual-earner couples with preschool children. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized model and bootstrap method was conducted to evaluate the indirect relationships. As hypothesized, among male and female workers, work engagement was positively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and recovery experiences. In contrast, workaholism was negatively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family conflict and recovery experiences excluding psychological detachment. Individual's mental well-being, in turn, was positively related to intimate partner's mental well-being. These findings suggested that work engagement and workaholism were related to intimate partner's mental well-being differently. These results further supported the SCM, suggesting that higher work engagement could increase workers' and their intimate partners' mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and their recovery experiences, while workaholism acts oppositely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2024-0094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2024-0094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了个人及其亲密伴侣的工作投入、工作狂和心理健康之间的关系。研究以印度尼西亚的双职工夫妇为背景,采用溢出-交叉模型(SCM)探讨了这种关系。该研究探讨了工作对家庭的溢出效应(即工作对家庭的冲突和促进)和恢复体验(即心理疏离、放松、掌握和控制)如何调节这些关系。我们对 186 对有学龄前子女的印尼双职工夫妇进行了横断面调查。采用结构方程模型对假设模型进行了检验,并采用引导法对间接关系进行了评估。正如假设的那样,在男性和女性工作者中,通过工作对家庭的促进作用和康复体验,工作投入与个人的心理健康呈正相关。相反,工作狂则通过工作与家庭的冲突和康复体验(不包括心理疏离)与个体的心理健康负相关。个人的心理健康反过来又与亲密伴侣的心理健康呈正相关。这些研究结果表明,工作投入和工作狂与亲密伴侣的心理健康有着不同的关系。这些结果进一步支持了单因素模式,表明较高的工作参与度可以通过工作对家庭的促进作用以及亲密伴侣的康复体验来提高工作者及其亲密伴侣的心理健康水平,而工作狂则起相反的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How work engagement and workaholism relate to individuals' and their intimate partners' mental well-being: a test of the spillover-crossover model among Indonesian dual-earner couples.

This study investigated the relationship between work engagement, workaholism, and mental well-being of individuals and their intimate partners. This association was explored in the context of Indonesian dual-earner couples, using the Spillover-Crossover Model (SCM). The study examined how work-to-family spillover (i.e. work-to-family conflict and facilitation) and recovery experiences (i.e. psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control) mediate these relationships. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 186 Indonesian dual-earner couples with preschool children. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized model and bootstrap method was conducted to evaluate the indirect relationships. As hypothesized, among male and female workers, work engagement was positively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and recovery experiences. In contrast, workaholism was negatively related to individual's mental well-being through work-to-family conflict and recovery experiences excluding psychological detachment. Individual's mental well-being, in turn, was positively related to intimate partner's mental well-being. These findings suggested that work engagement and workaholism were related to intimate partner's mental well-being differently. These results further supported the SCM, suggesting that higher work engagement could increase workers' and their intimate partners' mental well-being through work-to-family facilitation and their recovery experiences, while workaholism acts oppositely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信