血浆胃泌素与性别特异性、部位特异性和早发性结直肠癌的风险:孟德尔随机分析

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Emma Hazelwood, Catalina Lopez Manzano, Emma E Vincent, Demetrius Albanes, D Timothy Bishop, Loïc Le Marchand, Cornelia M Ulrich, Ulrike Peters, Gwen Murphy, N Jewel Samadder, Laura Anderson, Marc J Gunter, Neil Murphy, Bethany Van Guelpen, Nikos Papadimitriou
{"title":"血浆胃泌素与性别特异性、部位特异性和早发性结直肠癌的风险:孟德尔随机分析","authors":"Emma Hazelwood, Catalina Lopez Manzano, Emma E Vincent, Demetrius Albanes, D Timothy Bishop, Loïc Le Marchand, Cornelia M Ulrich, Ulrike Peters, Gwen Murphy, N Jewel Samadder, Laura Anderson, Marc J Gunter, Neil Murphy, Bethany Van Guelpen, Nikos Papadimitriou","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological and laboratory-based studies have provided conflicting evidence for a role of ghrelin in colorectal cancer (CRC) development. We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate evidence for an association of circulating ghrelin and CRC risk overall and by sex, cancer subsite and age at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic instruments proxying plasma total ghrelin levels were obtained from a recent genome-wide association study of 54,219 participants. Summary data for CRC risk were obtained from a recent meta-analysis of several genetic consortia (up to 73,673 cases and 86,854 controls). A two-sample MR approach and several sensitivity analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no evidence for an association of genetically-predicted plasma total ghrelin levels and CRC risk (0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.12; R2 of ghrelin genetic instruments: 4.6%), with similarly null results observed when stratified by sex, anatomical subsite, and for early-onset CRC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that plasma ghrelin levels are unlikely to have a causal relationship with overall, early-onset, and sex- and cancer subsite-stratified CRC risk.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This large-scale analysis adds to the growing body of evidence that plasma total ghrelin levels are not associated with CRC risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma ghrelin and risks of sex-specific, site-specific, and early-onset colorectal cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Hazelwood, Catalina Lopez Manzano, Emma E Vincent, Demetrius Albanes, D Timothy Bishop, Loïc Le Marchand, Cornelia M Ulrich, Ulrike Peters, Gwen Murphy, N Jewel Samadder, Laura Anderson, Marc J Gunter, Neil Murphy, Bethany Van Guelpen, Nikos Papadimitriou\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological and laboratory-based studies have provided conflicting evidence for a role of ghrelin in colorectal cancer (CRC) development. We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate evidence for an association of circulating ghrelin and CRC risk overall and by sex, cancer subsite and age at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genetic instruments proxying plasma total ghrelin levels were obtained from a recent genome-wide association study of 54,219 participants. Summary data for CRC risk were obtained from a recent meta-analysis of several genetic consortia (up to 73,673 cases and 86,854 controls). A two-sample MR approach and several sensitivity analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no evidence for an association of genetically-predicted plasma total ghrelin levels and CRC risk (0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.12; R2 of ghrelin genetic instruments: 4.6%), with similarly null results observed when stratified by sex, anatomical subsite, and for early-onset CRC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that plasma ghrelin levels are unlikely to have a causal relationship with overall, early-onset, and sex- and cancer subsite-stratified CRC risk.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This large-scale analysis adds to the growing body of evidence that plasma total ghrelin levels are not associated with CRC risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0926\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于胃泌素在结直肠癌(CRC)发病中的作用,流行病学和实验室研究提供了相互矛盾的证据。我们进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以评估循环胃泌素与总体 CRC 风险以及与性别、癌症分部位和诊断年龄相关的证据:代理血浆总胃泌素水平的遗传工具来自最近一项对 54,219 名参与者进行的全基因组关联研究。有关 CRC 风险的汇总数据来自最近对几个基因联盟(多达 73,673 例病例和 86,854 例对照)的荟萃分析。我们采用了双样本 MR 方法和几种敏感性分析:结果:我们发现,没有证据表明基因预测的血浆总胃泌素水平与 CRC 风险有关(0.95,95% 置信区间:0.81-1.12;胃泌素基因工具的 R2:4.6%):结论:我们的研究表明,血浆总胃泌素水平与癌症风险之间的关系是不确定的(0.95,95% 置信区间:0.81-1.12;胃泌素基因工具的 R2:4.6%):我们的研究表明,血浆胃泌素水平不太可能与总体、早发、按性别和癌症亚部位分层的 CRC 风险有因果关系:这项大规模分析补充了越来越多的证据,即血浆总胃泌素水平与 CRC 风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plasma ghrelin and risks of sex-specific, site-specific, and early-onset colorectal cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis.

Background: Epidemiological and laboratory-based studies have provided conflicting evidence for a role of ghrelin in colorectal cancer (CRC) development. We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to evaluate evidence for an association of circulating ghrelin and CRC risk overall and by sex, cancer subsite and age at diagnosis.

Methods: Genetic instruments proxying plasma total ghrelin levels were obtained from a recent genome-wide association study of 54,219 participants. Summary data for CRC risk were obtained from a recent meta-analysis of several genetic consortia (up to 73,673 cases and 86,854 controls). A two-sample MR approach and several sensitivity analyses were applied.

Results: We found no evidence for an association of genetically-predicted plasma total ghrelin levels and CRC risk (0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.12; R2 of ghrelin genetic instruments: 4.6%), with similarly null results observed when stratified by sex, anatomical subsite, and for early-onset CRC.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that plasma ghrelin levels are unlikely to have a causal relationship with overall, early-onset, and sex- and cancer subsite-stratified CRC risk.

Impact: This large-scale analysis adds to the growing body of evidence that plasma total ghrelin levels are not associated with CRC risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信