牙齿外伤后牙髓腔阻塞的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0092
Mariana Gouvêa Latini Abreu, Thaís de Oliveira Fernandes, Leonardo Santos Antunes, Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Lucianne Cople Maia de Faria
{"title":"牙齿外伤后牙髓腔阻塞的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mariana Gouvêa Latini Abreu, Thaís de Oliveira Fernandes, Leonardo Santos Antunes, Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Lucianne Cople Maia de Faria","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: What is the estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration in subtypes of traumatic dental injury (TDI) in deciduous and permanent teeth? The searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Grey Literature, and Google Scholar, and complemented by a manual search, until April 16th, 2023. Observational studies were selected based on population, exposure, and outcome (PEO) (P, deciduous or permanent teeth; E, TDI; O, pulp canal obliteration). Two reviewers (kappa 0.90) applied the eligibility criteria, extracted qualitative data, and assessed the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc 17.2. Thirty-four articles were selected after screening. The methodological quality was moderate to high. The estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was 27.6% (95%CI: 18.7-37.7) and 21.9% (95%CI:16.0-28.4), for permanent and deciduous teeth, respectively. Considering the TDI subtypes, the prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was higher in root fractures of the permanent teeth (78.6 %, 95%CI: 62.8-90.9) and lateral luxation injuries in deciduous teeth (29.4%, 95%CI:19.1-41.0). Our review of 34 articles of moderate and high methodological quality found that the prevalence of pulpal canal obliteration ranges from 21.9% to 27.6%. Pulp canal obliteration was most frequently detected following lateral luxation injuries of the deciduous teeth and root fractures of the permanent teeth (PROSPERO CRD42020179438).</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of pulp canal obliteration after traumatic dental injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Gouvêa Latini Abreu, Thaís de Oliveira Fernandes, Leonardo Santos Antunes, Lívia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Lucianne Cople Maia de Faria\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: What is the estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration in subtypes of traumatic dental injury (TDI) in deciduous and permanent teeth? The searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Grey Literature, and Google Scholar, and complemented by a manual search, until April 16th, 2023. Observational studies were selected based on population, exposure, and outcome (PEO) (P, deciduous or permanent teeth; E, TDI; O, pulp canal obliteration). Two reviewers (kappa 0.90) applied the eligibility criteria, extracted qualitative data, and assessed the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc 17.2. Thirty-four articles were selected after screening. The methodological quality was moderate to high. The estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was 27.6% (95%CI: 18.7-37.7) and 21.9% (95%CI:16.0-28.4), for permanent and deciduous teeth, respectively. Considering the TDI subtypes, the prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was higher in root fractures of the permanent teeth (78.6 %, 95%CI: 62.8-90.9) and lateral luxation injuries in deciduous teeth (29.4%, 95%CI:19.1-41.0). Our review of 34 articles of moderate and high methodological quality found that the prevalence of pulpal canal obliteration ranges from 21.9% to 27.6%. Pulp canal obliteration was most frequently detected following lateral luxation injuries of the deciduous teeth and root fractures of the permanent teeth (PROSPERO CRD42020179438).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"e092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在回答以下问题:牙髓管阻塞在乳牙和恒牙外伤(TDI)亚型中的估计发生率是多少?检索在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、Grey Literature 和 Google Scholar 中进行,并辅以人工检索,直至 2023 年 4 月 16 日。观察性研究的选择基于人群、暴露和结果(PEO)(P,乳牙或恒牙;E,TDI;O,牙髓腔阻塞)。两名审稿人(kappa 0.90)采用了资格标准,提取了定性数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华工具评估了方法学质量。使用 MedCalc 17.2 进行了荟萃分析。经过筛选,共有 34 篇文章入选。方法学质量为中高。恒牙和乳牙牙髓管阻塞的估计患病率分别为 27.6%(95%CI:18.7-37.7)和 21.9%(95%CI:16.0-28.4)。考虑到 TDI 的亚型,牙髓管阻塞在恒牙根折(78.6%,95%CI:62.8-90.9)和乳牙侧向塌陷损伤(29.4%,95%CI:19.1-41.0)中的发生率较高。我们对 34 篇中度和高度方法学质量的文章进行了回顾,发现牙髓管阻塞的发生率从 21.9% 到 27.6% 不等。牙髓管阻塞最常在乳牙侧向塌陷损伤和恒牙牙根骨折后发现(PROSPERO CRD42020179438)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of pulp canal obliteration after traumatic dental injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review aimed to answer the following question: What is the estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration in subtypes of traumatic dental injury (TDI) in deciduous and permanent teeth? The searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Grey Literature, and Google Scholar, and complemented by a manual search, until April 16th, 2023. Observational studies were selected based on population, exposure, and outcome (PEO) (P, deciduous or permanent teeth; E, TDI; O, pulp canal obliteration). Two reviewers (kappa 0.90) applied the eligibility criteria, extracted qualitative data, and assessed the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc 17.2. Thirty-four articles were selected after screening. The methodological quality was moderate to high. The estimated prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was 27.6% (95%CI: 18.7-37.7) and 21.9% (95%CI:16.0-28.4), for permanent and deciduous teeth, respectively. Considering the TDI subtypes, the prevalence of pulp canal obliteration was higher in root fractures of the permanent teeth (78.6 %, 95%CI: 62.8-90.9) and lateral luxation injuries in deciduous teeth (29.4%, 95%CI:19.1-41.0). Our review of 34 articles of moderate and high methodological quality found that the prevalence of pulpal canal obliteration ranges from 21.9% to 27.6%. Pulp canal obliteration was most frequently detected following lateral luxation injuries of the deciduous teeth and root fractures of the permanent teeth (PROSPERO CRD42020179438).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信