A-353 艾滋病毒/TP 快速多重检测的非专业用户测试

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
K D Jones, N Bauer
{"title":"A-353 艾滋病毒/TP 快速多重检测的非专业用户测试","authors":"K D Jones, N Bauer","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Palladium Diagnostics had developed a rapid, multiplexed POC assay for Syphilis and HIV for fingerstick whole blood. To increase potential patient engagement and simplify sample collection it was decided to expand the sample type from fingerstick whole blood to saliva without changing the test time or performance. Additionally, the test was designed to have a lower carbon footprint by using a bioplastic (environmentally friendly foam) for structural components rather than injection molded parts as are commonly used in other assays. The assay was run both by professional users in a lab setting and lay users in the field. Methods A flow through rapid assay was produced and tested both by professional users in a lab setting using library sample and by lay users in a field setting using self collected samples. Results The results are shown in table 1, the assay performance was broadly similar for both whole blood and saliva, however the saliva dataset was much smaller for the professional use setting. The human factor analysis from the lay user field studies showed that they preferred the saliva collection procedure however for a small subset of subjects it proved difficult to collect sufficient sample for testing. For subjects who were able to collect adequate sample the results corresponded well between the device and lab-based ELISA. Conclusions The lay user experience validated test design and function and proved the usability in the field.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-353 Lay User testing of Rapid Multiplexed HIV/TP test\",\"authors\":\"K D Jones, N Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Palladium Diagnostics had developed a rapid, multiplexed POC assay for Syphilis and HIV for fingerstick whole blood. To increase potential patient engagement and simplify sample collection it was decided to expand the sample type from fingerstick whole blood to saliva without changing the test time or performance. Additionally, the test was designed to have a lower carbon footprint by using a bioplastic (environmentally friendly foam) for structural components rather than injection molded parts as are commonly used in other assays. The assay was run both by professional users in a lab setting and lay users in the field. Methods A flow through rapid assay was produced and tested both by professional users in a lab setting using library sample and by lay users in a field setting using self collected samples. Results The results are shown in table 1, the assay performance was broadly similar for both whole blood and saliva, however the saliva dataset was much smaller for the professional use setting. The human factor analysis from the lay user field studies showed that they preferred the saliva collection procedure however for a small subset of subjects it proved difficult to collect sufficient sample for testing. For subjects who were able to collect adequate sample the results corresponded well between the device and lab-based ELISA. Conclusions The lay user experience validated test design and function and proved the usability in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.347\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 Palladium Diagnostics 公司开发了一种快速、多路复用的 POC 化验方法,用于梅毒和艾滋病毒的指血全血检测。为了提高潜在患者的参与度并简化样本采集,公司决定在不改变检测时间或性能的情况下,将样本类型从指模全血扩大到唾液。此外,该检测试剂盒的结构部件采用了生物塑料(环保泡沫),而不是其他检测试剂盒常用的注塑部件,从而降低了碳足迹。实验室的专业用户和实地的非专业用户都可以使用该检测方法。方法 由专业用户在实验室使用库中样本,非专业用户在现场使用自己收集的样本,制作并测试了流 通式快速检测法。结果 如表 1 所示,全血和唾液的检测性能大致相同,但专业用户使用的唾液数据集要小得多。非专业用户实地研究的人为因素分析表明,他们更喜欢唾液采集程序,但对于一小部分受试者来说,很难采集到足够的测试样本。对于能够采集到足够样本的受试者来说,设备和实验室酶联免疫吸附试验的结果非常吻合。结论 非专业用户的体验验证了测试的设计和功能,并证明了其在现场的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A-353 Lay User testing of Rapid Multiplexed HIV/TP test
Background Palladium Diagnostics had developed a rapid, multiplexed POC assay for Syphilis and HIV for fingerstick whole blood. To increase potential patient engagement and simplify sample collection it was decided to expand the sample type from fingerstick whole blood to saliva without changing the test time or performance. Additionally, the test was designed to have a lower carbon footprint by using a bioplastic (environmentally friendly foam) for structural components rather than injection molded parts as are commonly used in other assays. The assay was run both by professional users in a lab setting and lay users in the field. Methods A flow through rapid assay was produced and tested both by professional users in a lab setting using library sample and by lay users in a field setting using self collected samples. Results The results are shown in table 1, the assay performance was broadly similar for both whole blood and saliva, however the saliva dataset was much smaller for the professional use setting. The human factor analysis from the lay user field studies showed that they preferred the saliva collection procedure however for a small subset of subjects it proved difficult to collect sufficient sample for testing. For subjects who were able to collect adequate sample the results corresponded well between the device and lab-based ELISA. Conclusions The lay user experience validated test design and function and proved the usability in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信