A A Uribe, A Flores, J Fiorda-Diaz, E Vera-Miquilena, J Reeves, B Applegate, A Waldron, G Oldendorp, F Viola, D Winegar
{"title":"A-355 使用 QPlus 和 QStat 血盒在定量系统上分析动脉和静脉全血样本的比较","authors":"A A Uribe, A Flores, J Fiorda-Diaz, E Vera-Miquilena, J Reeves, B Applegate, A Waldron, G Oldendorp, F Viola, D Winegar","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Quantra Hemostasis System (HemoSonics, LLC) is a cartridge-based viscoelastic testing system used to monitor the coagulation status of whole blood samples. The clinical performance of the System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges was demonstrated in patients undergoing surgical procedures using venous blood samples. However, depending on the nature of the surgical procedure, arterial or venous samples may be more accessible for testing. It is currently unknown if differences exist between the two samples for the Quantra System. This study compared QPlus and QStat parameters measurements in venous and arterial blood samples collected in parallel from patients undergoing cardiac or liver transplant surgery. Methods Two studies were conducted according to CLSI EP09. The cardiac study enrolled 50 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass to evaluate QPlus parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples were obtained at two time points: during bypass and post-protamine. The liver study enrolled 25 adult patients undergoing liver transplantation to evaluate QStat parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples from were obtained at three time points: baseline, anhepatic and reperfusion phases. All arterial samples were drawn from an existing arterial catheter whereas venous samples were drawn from the venous side of the bypass circuit or from the central venous catheter (proximal port to minimize infusion contamination). Linear regression analysis and means comparison (paired t-test) were used to assess whether the two sample types provided equivalent results, Results Table 1 provides the mean values for each parameter determined for venous and arterial samples. None of the parameters showed a significant difference between sample types (P > 0.05). Additionally, the linear regression analysis show strong correlation between the results for each parameter. Conclusions Both studies demonstrated that venous and arterial whole blood samples provide equivalent results on the Quantra System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-355 Comparison of Arterial and Venous Whole Blood Samples Analyzed on the QuantraSystem With the QPlusand QStatCartridges\",\"authors\":\"A A Uribe, A Flores, J Fiorda-Diaz, E Vera-Miquilena, J Reeves, B Applegate, A Waldron, G Oldendorp, F Viola, D Winegar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The Quantra Hemostasis System (HemoSonics, LLC) is a cartridge-based viscoelastic testing system used to monitor the coagulation status of whole blood samples. The clinical performance of the System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges was demonstrated in patients undergoing surgical procedures using venous blood samples. However, depending on the nature of the surgical procedure, arterial or venous samples may be more accessible for testing. It is currently unknown if differences exist between the two samples for the Quantra System. This study compared QPlus and QStat parameters measurements in venous and arterial blood samples collected in parallel from patients undergoing cardiac or liver transplant surgery. Methods Two studies were conducted according to CLSI EP09. The cardiac study enrolled 50 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass to evaluate QPlus parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples were obtained at two time points: during bypass and post-protamine. The liver study enrolled 25 adult patients undergoing liver transplantation to evaluate QStat parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples from were obtained at three time points: baseline, anhepatic and reperfusion phases. All arterial samples were drawn from an existing arterial catheter whereas venous samples were drawn from the venous side of the bypass circuit or from the central venous catheter (proximal port to minimize infusion contamination). Linear regression analysis and means comparison (paired t-test) were used to assess whether the two sample types provided equivalent results, Results Table 1 provides the mean values for each parameter determined for venous and arterial samples. None of the parameters showed a significant difference between sample types (P > 0.05). Additionally, the linear regression analysis show strong correlation between the results for each parameter. Conclusions Both studies demonstrated that venous and arterial whole blood samples provide equivalent results on the Quantra System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A-355 Comparison of Arterial and Venous Whole Blood Samples Analyzed on the QuantraSystem With the QPlusand QStatCartridges
Background The Quantra Hemostasis System (HemoSonics, LLC) is a cartridge-based viscoelastic testing system used to monitor the coagulation status of whole blood samples. The clinical performance of the System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges was demonstrated in patients undergoing surgical procedures using venous blood samples. However, depending on the nature of the surgical procedure, arterial or venous samples may be more accessible for testing. It is currently unknown if differences exist between the two samples for the Quantra System. This study compared QPlus and QStat parameters measurements in venous and arterial blood samples collected in parallel from patients undergoing cardiac or liver transplant surgery. Methods Two studies were conducted according to CLSI EP09. The cardiac study enrolled 50 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass to evaluate QPlus parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples were obtained at two time points: during bypass and post-protamine. The liver study enrolled 25 adult patients undergoing liver transplantation to evaluate QStat parameters. Matching arterial and venous samples from were obtained at three time points: baseline, anhepatic and reperfusion phases. All arterial samples were drawn from an existing arterial catheter whereas venous samples were drawn from the venous side of the bypass circuit or from the central venous catheter (proximal port to minimize infusion contamination). Linear regression analysis and means comparison (paired t-test) were used to assess whether the two sample types provided equivalent results, Results Table 1 provides the mean values for each parameter determined for venous and arterial samples. None of the parameters showed a significant difference between sample types (P > 0.05). Additionally, the linear regression analysis show strong correlation between the results for each parameter. Conclusions Both studies demonstrated that venous and arterial whole blood samples provide equivalent results on the Quantra System with the QPlus and QStat Cartridges.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.