在治疗长间隙食道闭锁患者时,我们利用原生食道进行修复的经验,如 Foker 和 Gazi 方法。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez
{"title":"在治疗长间隙食道闭锁患者时,我们利用原生食道进行修复的经验,如 Foker 和 Gazi 方法。","authors":"Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 3","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our experience in repairs using the native esophagus such as the Foker and Gazi methods in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.\",\"authors\":\"Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"479-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分享我们使用原生食管和 Foker 及 Gazi 方法修复长间隙食管闭锁(LGEA)婴儿的经验。我们回顾性分析了 10 名 LGEA 患者(其中 6 名为纯食管闭锁 [EA],4 名为远端气管食管瘘 [TEF] + EA)的病历。食管袋之间的平均长度为 5.9 厘米(4-9 厘米)。五例采用 Foker 方法,三例采用 Gazi 方法,两例在每日使用止血带后进行延迟初次修复,分别在首次手术后平均 19.3 天和最终食管吻合术后平均 26.4 天进行。而使用 Foker 技术则需要 36.1 天。他们首次口服食物的时间为 10.2 天,过渡到全肠食物的时间为 26.2 天。有六名患者被检测出食道漏。分别为三名和四名患者进行了胃底折叠术和扩张术。为取得良好效果,LGEA 患者至少应在专业中心由经验丰富的外科医生指导下进行手术,手术团队应熟悉使用原生食管的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Our experience in repairs using the native esophagus such as the Foker and Gazi methods in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.

This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted. Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信