11-13 岁游泳运动员在游泳、骑自行车和曲臂运动中的有氧能力。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Viktorija Maconyte, Loreta Stasiule, Antanas Juodsnukis, Ilona Judita Zuoziene, Arvydas Stasiulis
{"title":"11-13 岁游泳运动员在游泳、骑自行车和曲臂运动中的有氧能力。","authors":"Viktorija Maconyte, Loreta Stasiule, Antanas Juodsnukis, Ilona Judita Zuoziene, Arvydas Stasiulis","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-00974-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven swimmers (mean age, 12.1 ± 1.0 years) performed three incremental exercise tests. One of the tests was performed under specific conditions (front crawl swimming), and the other two were under non-specific conditions (cycling and arm cranking). Data on the pulmonary gas exchange were recorded using the portable analyser MetaMax 3B (Cortex, Leipzig, Germany). One-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was employed to test the null hypothesis and determine statistically significant differences between the indicators obtained under specific and non-specific testing conditions. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships between the indicators of the pulmonary gas exchange.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak) value during swimming was 49.3 ± 6.2 mL/kg/min, which was higher than that during arm cranking (39.6 ± 7.3 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (54.3 ± 7.8 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01). The peak minute ventilation (V̇<sub>E</sub>peak) value during swimming (84.9 ± 12.6 L/min) was higher than that during arm cranking (69.4 ± 18.2 L/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (98.4 ± 15.4 L/min; P < 0.01). Strong positive correlations were observed in the absolute and relative V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak values between swimming and cycling (r = 0.857, P < 0.01; r = 0.657, P < 0.05) and between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.899, P < 0.01; r = 0.863, P < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was also observed in V̇<sub>E</sub>peak values between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.626, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swimmers aged 11-13 years showed V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and V̇<sub>E</sub>peak values during the specific swimming test greater than those during arm cranking but lower than those during cycling. However, aerobic capacity parameters measured during specific swimming conditions correlated with those measured during non-specific arm cranking and cycling conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years.\",\"authors\":\"Viktorija Maconyte, Loreta Stasiule, Antanas Juodsnukis, Ilona Judita Zuoziene, Arvydas Stasiulis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13102-024-00974-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven swimmers (mean age, 12.1 ± 1.0 years) performed three incremental exercise tests. One of the tests was performed under specific conditions (front crawl swimming), and the other two were under non-specific conditions (cycling and arm cranking). Data on the pulmonary gas exchange were recorded using the portable analyser MetaMax 3B (Cortex, Leipzig, Germany). One-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was employed to test the null hypothesis and determine statistically significant differences between the indicators obtained under specific and non-specific testing conditions. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships between the indicators of the pulmonary gas exchange.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak) value during swimming was 49.3 ± 6.2 mL/kg/min, which was higher than that during arm cranking (39.6 ± 7.3 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (54.3 ± 7.8 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01). The peak minute ventilation (V̇<sub>E</sub>peak) value during swimming (84.9 ± 12.6 L/min) was higher than that during arm cranking (69.4 ± 18.2 L/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (98.4 ± 15.4 L/min; P < 0.01). Strong positive correlations were observed in the absolute and relative V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak values between swimming and cycling (r = 0.857, P < 0.01; r = 0.657, P < 0.05) and between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.899, P < 0.01; r = 0.863, P < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was also observed in V̇<sub>E</sub>peak values between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.626, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swimmers aged 11-13 years showed V̇O<sub>2</sub>peak and V̇<sub>E</sub>peak values during the specific swimming test greater than those during arm cranking but lower than those during cycling. However, aerobic capacity parameters measured during specific swimming conditions correlated with those measured during non-specific arm cranking and cycling conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00974-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00974-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在比较 11-13 岁游泳运动员在游泳、骑自行车和曲臂运动中的有氧能力:11 名游泳运动员(平均年龄为 12.1 ± 1.0 岁)进行了三项增量运动测试。其中一项测试是在特定条件下进行的(前爬泳),另外两项测试是在非特定条件下进行的(骑自行车和曲臂)。使用便携式分析仪 MetaMax 3B (Cortex,德国莱比锡)记录肺气体交换数据。采用重复测量的单因子方差分析来检验零假设,并确定在特异性和非特异性测试条件下获得的指标之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。计算皮尔逊相关系数以评估肺气体交换指标之间的关系:游泳时的相对摄氧量峰值(V.J.O2peak)为 49.3 ± 6.2 mL/kg/min,高于曲臂时的相对摄氧量峰值(39.6 ± 7.3 mL/kg/min);游泳时的相对摄氧量峰值(P Epeak)为 84.9 ± 12.6 升/分钟)高于曲臂运动时(69.4 ± 18.2 升/分钟;P 2)游泳和骑自行车时的峰值(r = 0.857,P 2)游泳和曲臂运动时的峰值(r = 0.626,P 2):11-13岁游泳运动员在特定游泳测试中的VO2peak和VEpeak值高于曲臂时的值,但低于骑自行车时的值。然而,在特定游泳条件下测得的有氧能力参数与非特定曲臂和骑自行车条件下测得的有氧能力参数相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years.

Background: This study aimed to compare the aerobic capacity in swimming, cycling and arm cranking in swimmers aged 11-13 years.

Methods: Eleven swimmers (mean age, 12.1 ± 1.0 years) performed three incremental exercise tests. One of the tests was performed under specific conditions (front crawl swimming), and the other two were under non-specific conditions (cycling and arm cranking). Data on the pulmonary gas exchange were recorded using the portable analyser MetaMax 3B (Cortex, Leipzig, Germany). One-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was employed to test the null hypothesis and determine statistically significant differences between the indicators obtained under specific and non-specific testing conditions. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships between the indicators of the pulmonary gas exchange.

Results: The relative peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) value during swimming was 49.3 ± 6.2 mL/kg/min, which was higher than that during arm cranking (39.6 ± 7.3 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (54.3 ± 7.8 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01). The peak minute ventilation (V̇Epeak) value during swimming (84.9 ± 12.6 L/min) was higher than that during arm cranking (69.4 ± 18.2 L/min; P < 0.01) but lower than that during cycling (98.4 ± 15.4 L/min; P < 0.01). Strong positive correlations were observed in the absolute and relative V̇O2peak values between swimming and cycling (r = 0.857, P < 0.01; r = 0.657, P < 0.05) and between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.899, P < 0.01; r = 0.863, P < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was also observed in V̇Epeak values between swimming and arm cranking (r = 0.626, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Swimmers aged 11-13 years showed V̇O2peak and V̇Epeak values during the specific swimming test greater than those during arm cranking but lower than those during cycling. However, aerobic capacity parameters measured during specific swimming conditions correlated with those measured during non-specific arm cranking and cycling conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信