评估全髋关节置换术后用于诱发位移测量的传统和基于 CT 的放射立体测量分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jennifer S. Polus, Bart L. Kaptein, Edward M. Vasarhelyi, Brent A. Lanting, Matthew G. Teeter
{"title":"评估全髋关节置换术后用于诱发位移测量的传统和基于 CT 的放射立体测量分析。","authors":"Jennifer S. Polus,&nbsp;Bart L. Kaptein,&nbsp;Edward M. Vasarhelyi,&nbsp;Brent A. Lanting,&nbsp;Matthew G. Teeter","doi":"10.1002/jor.25981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Though radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration tracking, computed tomography-based RSA (CT-RSA) does not require marker beads and is available for clinical adoption. This study investigated CT-RSA in comparison to RSA for assessing hip implant stability with inducible displacement (ID) examinations. Patients (<i>n</i> = 48) from a previous study returned to be re-examined for femoral stem stability with CT-RSA and RSA imaging. Implant migration since patients last follow-up was calculated as a measure of stability. ID was assessed between alternated leg rotation scans for CT-RSA and between supine and weight-bearing scans for RSA. Measurements from ID and double examinations were compared between CT-RSA and RSA. All stems were well-fixed with migration &lt;0.2 mm/year. ID measurements were lower with CT-RSA than RSA for distal translation (mean difference = 0.122 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), total translation (mean difference = 0.158 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and total rotation (mean difference = 0.449°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The ID and double exam were significantly different for total translation and total rotation for CT-RSA, and significantly different for medial, distal, and total translation, and total rotation for RSA. Precision ranged from 0.049 to 0.130 mm in translation and 0.061° to 0.220° in rotation for CT-RSA, and from 0.108 to 0.269 mm in translation and 0.151° to 0.670° in rotation for RSA. ID measurements from both CT-RSA and RSA were minimal, consistent for a cohort with well-fixed stems. CT-RSA demonstrated superior precision in all axes compared to RSA. Clinical Significance: Future work should explore the use of CT-RSA in patients with suspected loosening as a potential diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"43 1","pages":"192-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.25981","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of conventional and CT-based radiostereometric analysis for inducible displacement measurements after total hip arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S. Polus,&nbsp;Bart L. Kaptein,&nbsp;Edward M. Vasarhelyi,&nbsp;Brent A. Lanting,&nbsp;Matthew G. Teeter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.25981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Though radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration tracking, computed tomography-based RSA (CT-RSA) does not require marker beads and is available for clinical adoption. This study investigated CT-RSA in comparison to RSA for assessing hip implant stability with inducible displacement (ID) examinations. Patients (<i>n</i> = 48) from a previous study returned to be re-examined for femoral stem stability with CT-RSA and RSA imaging. Implant migration since patients last follow-up was calculated as a measure of stability. ID was assessed between alternated leg rotation scans for CT-RSA and between supine and weight-bearing scans for RSA. Measurements from ID and double examinations were compared between CT-RSA and RSA. All stems were well-fixed with migration &lt;0.2 mm/year. ID measurements were lower with CT-RSA than RSA for distal translation (mean difference = 0.122 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), total translation (mean difference = 0.158 mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and total rotation (mean difference = 0.449°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The ID and double exam were significantly different for total translation and total rotation for CT-RSA, and significantly different for medial, distal, and total translation, and total rotation for RSA. Precision ranged from 0.049 to 0.130 mm in translation and 0.061° to 0.220° in rotation for CT-RSA, and from 0.108 to 0.269 mm in translation and 0.151° to 0.670° in rotation for RSA. ID measurements from both CT-RSA and RSA were minimal, consistent for a cohort with well-fixed stems. CT-RSA demonstrated superior precision in all axes compared to RSA. Clinical Significance: Future work should explore the use of CT-RSA in patients with suspected loosening as a potential diagnostic tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"192-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.25981\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然放射性立体计量分析(RSA)是移位跟踪的黄金标准,但基于计算机断层扫描的 RSA(CT-RSA)不需要标记珠,可用于临床。本研究将 CT-RSA 与 RSA 进行了比较,通过诱导位移(ID)检查来评估髋关节植入物的稳定性。前一项研究的患者(n = 48)返回医院,通过 CT-RSA 和 RSA 成像重新检查股骨柄的稳定性。计算患者上次复查后的植入物移位情况,作为稳定性的衡量标准。CT-RSA在交替腿部旋转扫描之间评估ID,RSA在仰卧和负重扫描之间评估ID。在 CT-RSA 和 RSA 之间比较了 ID 和双重检查的测量结果。所有茎突均固定良好,并有移位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of conventional and CT-based radiostereometric analysis for inducible displacement measurements after total hip arthroplasty

Evaluation of conventional and CT-based radiostereometric analysis for inducible displacement measurements after total hip arthroplasty

Though radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration tracking, computed tomography-based RSA (CT-RSA) does not require marker beads and is available for clinical adoption. This study investigated CT-RSA in comparison to RSA for assessing hip implant stability with inducible displacement (ID) examinations. Patients (n = 48) from a previous study returned to be re-examined for femoral stem stability with CT-RSA and RSA imaging. Implant migration since patients last follow-up was calculated as a measure of stability. ID was assessed between alternated leg rotation scans for CT-RSA and between supine and weight-bearing scans for RSA. Measurements from ID and double examinations were compared between CT-RSA and RSA. All stems were well-fixed with migration <0.2 mm/year. ID measurements were lower with CT-RSA than RSA for distal translation (mean difference = 0.122 mm, p < 0.0001), total translation (mean difference = 0.158 mm, p < 0.0001), and total rotation (mean difference = 0.449°, p < 0.0001). The ID and double exam were significantly different for total translation and total rotation for CT-RSA, and significantly different for medial, distal, and total translation, and total rotation for RSA. Precision ranged from 0.049 to 0.130 mm in translation and 0.061° to 0.220° in rotation for CT-RSA, and from 0.108 to 0.269 mm in translation and 0.151° to 0.670° in rotation for RSA. ID measurements from both CT-RSA and RSA were minimal, consistent for a cohort with well-fixed stems. CT-RSA demonstrated superior precision in all axes compared to RSA. Clinical Significance: Future work should explore the use of CT-RSA in patients with suspected loosening as a potential diagnostic tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信