在对无子宫产妇进行引产时,在 Foley 球囊催熟术后早期羊膜切开术后 8 h 与 4 h 进行常规阴道检查以评估产程进展:随机试验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
C M Nashreen, Mukhri Hamdan, Jesrine Hong, Maherah Kamarudin, Rahmah Saaid, Peng Chiong Tan
{"title":"在对无子宫产妇进行引产时,在 Foley 球囊催熟术后早期羊膜切开术后 8 h 与 4 h 进行常规阴道检查以评估产程进展:随机试验。","authors":"C M Nashreen, Mukhri Hamdan, Jesrine Hong, Maherah Kamarudin, Rahmah Saaid, Peng Chiong Tan","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our objective was to compare the performance of the first vaginal examination at 8 versus 4 h after amniotomy following Foley ripening in nulliparous labor induction.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2021 to January 2022. 210 nulliparas at term for labor induction were randomized: 105 each to first vaginal examination at 8 or 4 h after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to expedite labor. Primary outcomes were the amniotomy-to-delivery interval (non-inferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction with their allocated labor care (superiority hypothesis) within 24 h after delivery. Analyses performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amniotomy-to-delivery interval was mean ± standard deviation 8.7 ± 3.4 versus 8.4 ± 3.7, mean difference 0.4 (97.5% CI: -0.7 to 1.5) hours, p = 0.442 within the pre-specified 2-hour non-inferiority margin, and maternal satisfaction score with allocated labor care was median [interquartile range] 8[7.5-10] versus 8[7.0-10], p = 0.248 for 8 versus 4 h arms, respectively. The amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals was 5.9 ± 2.3 versus 3.6 ± 1.0 h, p < 0.001, and the number of vaginal examinations was 2[1-2.5] versus 3 [2, 3], p < 0.001 for 8 versus 4 h, respectively. The first vaginal examination was less likely to have been performed as scheduled, more likely to be indicated by the urge to bear down, and non-reassuring cardiotocography for the 8 h arm (p < 0.001). Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely and instrumental vaginal delivery less likely, but cesarean rate was not significantly different for the 8 h arm (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A routine first vaginal examination at 8 h compared to 4 h is non-inferior for the time to birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction although the number of vaginal examinations is fewer. The increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery and reduction in instrumental vaginal delivery rates warrant further powered primary evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine vaginal examination to assess labour progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"C M Nashreen, Mukhri Hamdan, Jesrine Hong, Maherah Kamarudin, Rahmah Saaid, Peng Chiong Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.14975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our objective was to compare the performance of the first vaginal examination at 8 versus 4 h after amniotomy following Foley ripening in nulliparous labor induction.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2021 to January 2022. 210 nulliparas at term for labor induction were randomized: 105 each to first vaginal examination at 8 or 4 h after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to expedite labor. Primary outcomes were the amniotomy-to-delivery interval (non-inferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction with their allocated labor care (superiority hypothesis) within 24 h after delivery. Analyses performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amniotomy-to-delivery interval was mean ± standard deviation 8.7 ± 3.4 versus 8.4 ± 3.7, mean difference 0.4 (97.5% CI: -0.7 to 1.5) hours, p = 0.442 within the pre-specified 2-hour non-inferiority margin, and maternal satisfaction score with allocated labor care was median [interquartile range] 8[7.5-10] versus 8[7.0-10], p = 0.248 for 8 versus 4 h arms, respectively. The amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals was 5.9 ± 2.3 versus 3.6 ± 1.0 h, p < 0.001, and the number of vaginal examinations was 2[1-2.5] versus 3 [2, 3], p < 0.001 for 8 versus 4 h, respectively. The first vaginal examination was less likely to have been performed as scheduled, more likely to be indicated by the urge to bear down, and non-reassuring cardiotocography for the 8 h arm (p < 0.001). Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely and instrumental vaginal delivery less likely, but cesarean rate was not significantly different for the 8 h arm (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A routine first vaginal examination at 8 h compared to 4 h is non-inferior for the time to birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction although the number of vaginal examinations is fewer. The increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery and reduction in instrumental vaginal delivery rates warrant further powered primary evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言我们的目的是比较无痛引产中羊膜腔穿刺术后8小时与4小时首次阴道检查的效果:一项随机对照试验于 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。210 名足月引产的无子宫产妇被随机分配:各105例在Foley球囊催产和羊膜切开术后8小时或4小时进行首次阴道检查。羊膜切开术后常规开始滴注催产素,以加速分娩。主要结果是羊膜腔切开术到分娩的时间间隔(非劣效假设)和分娩后24小时内产妇对所分配的分娩护理的满意度(优效假设)。根据情况使用 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验和卡方检验进行分析:羊膜腔穿刺至分娩时间间隔的平均值(±标准差)为 8.7±3.4 小时对 8.4±3.7 小时,平均差为 0.4(97.5% CI:-0.7 至 1.5)小时,P = 0.442,在预先规定的 2 小时非劣效区间内,产妇对分配的分娩护理满意度评分的中位数[四分位间范围]为 8[7.5-10] 分对 8[7.0-10] 分,8 小时对 4 小时组的 P = 0.248。从羊膜切开术到首次阴道检查的时间间隔为 5.9±2.3 小时对 3.6±1.0 小时,P 结论:常规首次阴道检查时间为 8 小时与 4 小时相比,分娩时间并无差别,但虽然阴道检查次数减少了,但并没有提高产妇满意度。自然阴道分娩率的提高和器械阴道分娩率的降低值得进一步进行有动力的初步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine vaginal examination to assess labour progress at 8 compared to 4 h after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas: A randomized trial.

Introduction: Our objective was to compare the performance of the first vaginal examination at 8 versus 4 h after amniotomy following Foley ripening in nulliparous labor induction.

Material and methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2021 to January 2022. 210 nulliparas at term for labor induction were randomized: 105 each to first vaginal examination at 8 or 4 h after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to expedite labor. Primary outcomes were the amniotomy-to-delivery interval (non-inferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction with their allocated labor care (superiority hypothesis) within 24 h after delivery. Analyses performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test as appropriate.

Results: The amniotomy-to-delivery interval was mean ± standard deviation 8.7 ± 3.4 versus 8.4 ± 3.7, mean difference 0.4 (97.5% CI: -0.7 to 1.5) hours, p = 0.442 within the pre-specified 2-hour non-inferiority margin, and maternal satisfaction score with allocated labor care was median [interquartile range] 8[7.5-10] versus 8[7.0-10], p = 0.248 for 8 versus 4 h arms, respectively. The amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals was 5.9 ± 2.3 versus 3.6 ± 1.0 h, p < 0.001, and the number of vaginal examinations was 2[1-2.5] versus 3 [2, 3], p < 0.001 for 8 versus 4 h, respectively. The first vaginal examination was less likely to have been performed as scheduled, more likely to be indicated by the urge to bear down, and non-reassuring cardiotocography for the 8 h arm (p < 0.001). Spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely and instrumental vaginal delivery less likely, but cesarean rate was not significantly different for the 8 h arm (p = 0.017).

Conclusions: A routine first vaginal examination at 8 h compared to 4 h is non-inferior for the time to birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction although the number of vaginal examinations is fewer. The increase in spontaneous vaginal delivery and reduction in instrumental vaginal delivery rates warrant further powered primary evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信