2000-2023 年非洲多国重大疫情爆发期间与机构检疫和隔离有关的文化问题范围审查

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ebunoluwa Oduwole, Jimoh Amzat, Olusola Aluko-Arowolo, Rotimi Afolabi, Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji, Saheed Akinmayowa Lawal, Ige Angela Temisan, Ayoyinka Oludiran, Kafayat Aminu, Afeez Abolarinwa Salami, Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi
{"title":"2000-2023 年非洲多国重大疫情爆发期间与机构检疫和隔离有关的文化问题范围审查","authors":"Ebunoluwa Oduwole,&nbsp;Jimoh Amzat,&nbsp;Olusola Aluko-Arowolo,&nbsp;Rotimi Afolabi,&nbsp;Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji,&nbsp;Saheed Akinmayowa Lawal,&nbsp;Ige Angela Temisan,&nbsp;Ayoyinka Oludiran,&nbsp;Kafayat Aminu,&nbsp;Afeez Abolarinwa Salami,&nbsp;Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Infectious disease outbreaks pose significant challenges in Africa due to its ecology, socioeconomic conditions, and weak health systems. Implementing institutional quarantine and isolation (Q&amp;I) measures is crucial for managing major outbreaks. However, the cultural context often determines the success of these measures. This scoping review aims to examine existing evidence on the cultural aspects of institutional Q&amp;I in Africa over the past two decades, focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic and other major multi-country disease outbreaks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review's protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework registry. Nine research databases were systematically searched to retrieve all relevant literature, followed by deduplication and a two-stage screening process using the Rayyan web application. The inclusion of any literature into this review was based on a set of eligibility criteria. Also, manual searching of the reference lists of included literature was done to retrieve any other eligible literature. From the included literature, data were charted, collected, and summarized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Out of the 787 articles retrieved from the database searches, this review found only one to be eligible for inclusion. Also, no other eligible article was obtained after manual searching of the reference list for this article. The reviewed article presented empirical findings on the impact of COVID-19 Q&amp;I protocols on traditional burial rites in Ghana. Many Ghanaian families were against their country's protocol because they felt it was insensitive to their traditional values and burial practices. Also, the way the protocol was implemented made some Ghanaian families feel that foreign burial practices were imposed on them, which bred feelings of cultural exclusion and neglect (by the government) among Ghanaians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Research evidence on the cultural implications of Q&amp;I in Africa is very scanty. More research is needed on this topic of public health interest.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of cultural issues concerning institutional quarantine and isolation during major multi-country outbreaks in Africa: 2000–2023\",\"authors\":\"Ebunoluwa Oduwole,&nbsp;Jimoh Amzat,&nbsp;Olusola Aluko-Arowolo,&nbsp;Rotimi Afolabi,&nbsp;Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji,&nbsp;Saheed Akinmayowa Lawal,&nbsp;Ige Angela Temisan,&nbsp;Ayoyinka Oludiran,&nbsp;Kafayat Aminu,&nbsp;Afeez Abolarinwa Salami,&nbsp;Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Infectious disease outbreaks pose significant challenges in Africa due to its ecology, socioeconomic conditions, and weak health systems. Implementing institutional quarantine and isolation (Q&amp;I) measures is crucial for managing major outbreaks. However, the cultural context often determines the success of these measures. This scoping review aims to examine existing evidence on the cultural aspects of institutional Q&amp;I in Africa over the past two decades, focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic and other major multi-country disease outbreaks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This scoping review's protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework registry. Nine research databases were systematically searched to retrieve all relevant literature, followed by deduplication and a two-stage screening process using the Rayyan web application. The inclusion of any literature into this review was based on a set of eligibility criteria. Also, manual searching of the reference lists of included literature was done to retrieve any other eligible literature. From the included literature, data were charted, collected, and summarized.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of the 787 articles retrieved from the database searches, this review found only one to be eligible for inclusion. Also, no other eligible article was obtained after manual searching of the reference list for this article. The reviewed article presented empirical findings on the impact of COVID-19 Q&amp;I protocols on traditional burial rites in Ghana. Many Ghanaian families were against their country's protocol because they felt it was insensitive to their traditional values and burial practices. Also, the way the protocol was implemented made some Ghanaian families feel that foreign burial practices were imposed on them, which bred feelings of cultural exclusion and neglect (by the government) among Ghanaians.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Research evidence on the cultural implications of Q&amp;I in Africa is very scanty. More research is needed on this topic of public health interest.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 由于非洲的生态、社会经济条件和薄弱的卫生系统,传染病爆发给非洲带来了巨大挑战。实施机构检疫和隔离(Q&I)措施对于管理重大疾病爆发至关重要。然而,文化背景往往决定了这些措施的成败。本范围界定综述旨在研究过去二十年来非洲机构检疫和隔离措施的文化方面的现有证据,重点关注 COVID-19 大流行和其他重大多国疾病暴发。 方法 本范围界定综述的协议已在开放科学框架注册中心注册。我们系统地搜索了九个研究数据库,以检索所有相关文献,然后使用 Rayyan 网络应用程序进行重复数据删除和两阶段筛选。任何文献是否被纳入本综述均基于一套资格标准。此外,还对纳入文献的参考文献目录进行了人工搜索,以检索任何其他符合条件的文献。从纳入的文献中,我们绘制了图表,收集并总结了数据。 研究结果 在数据库检索到的 787 篇文章中,本综述仅发现一篇符合纳入条件。此外,在人工搜索这篇文章的参考文献列表后,也没有发现其他符合条件的文章。这篇综述文章介绍了 COVID-19 Q&I 协议对加纳传统丧葬仪式影响的实证研究结果。许多加纳家庭反对本国的规程,因为他们认为该规程对他们的传统价值观和丧葬习俗不敏感。此外,协议的实施方式也让一些加纳家庭觉得外国的丧葬习俗是强加给他们的,这在加纳人 中滋生了文化排斥和(政府)忽视的情绪。 结论 有关 Q&I 在非洲的文化影响的研究证据非常少。需要对这一关系到公众健康的课题进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A scoping review of cultural issues concerning institutional quarantine and isolation during major multi-country outbreaks in Africa: 2000–2023

A scoping review of cultural issues concerning institutional quarantine and isolation during major multi-country outbreaks in Africa: 2000–2023

Background and Aims

Infectious disease outbreaks pose significant challenges in Africa due to its ecology, socioeconomic conditions, and weak health systems. Implementing institutional quarantine and isolation (Q&I) measures is crucial for managing major outbreaks. However, the cultural context often determines the success of these measures. This scoping review aims to examine existing evidence on the cultural aspects of institutional Q&I in Africa over the past two decades, focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic and other major multi-country disease outbreaks.

Methods

This scoping review's protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework registry. Nine research databases were systematically searched to retrieve all relevant literature, followed by deduplication and a two-stage screening process using the Rayyan web application. The inclusion of any literature into this review was based on a set of eligibility criteria. Also, manual searching of the reference lists of included literature was done to retrieve any other eligible literature. From the included literature, data were charted, collected, and summarized.

Findings

Out of the 787 articles retrieved from the database searches, this review found only one to be eligible for inclusion. Also, no other eligible article was obtained after manual searching of the reference list for this article. The reviewed article presented empirical findings on the impact of COVID-19 Q&I protocols on traditional burial rites in Ghana. Many Ghanaian families were against their country's protocol because they felt it was insensitive to their traditional values and burial practices. Also, the way the protocol was implemented made some Ghanaian families feel that foreign burial practices were imposed on them, which bred feelings of cultural exclusion and neglect (by the government) among Ghanaians.

Conclusion

Research evidence on the cultural implications of Q&I in Africa is very scanty. More research is needed on this topic of public health interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信