汽车制造商是否向消费者多收了电动汽车电池的费用?

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Tamara L. Sheldon , Rubal Dua
{"title":"汽车制造商是否向消费者多收了电动汽车电池的费用?","authors":"Tamara L. Sheldon ,&nbsp;Rubal Dua","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the recent slowdown in EV adoption rates in many countries despite decreasing battery prices, a better understanding the relationship between battery and EV prices is critical for industry and policymakers. We fill this gap in the literature by assessing to what extent ongoing increases in EV battery capacities have increased EV prices, and how this compares with actual EV battery prices. Specifically, we use fixed effects regression analysis to investigate the responsiveness of EV list prices to changes in battery capacity over time, finding evidence that increases in battery capacity led to increases in EV prices that are substantially greater than estimated EV battery costs over our sample. This suggests that automakers may be overcharging consumers for EV batteries and that recent decreases in battery prices are not fully benefiting consumers. This, in turn, suggests that EV prices have been higher than they otherwise could have been, which may have led to slower EV adoption in recent years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101538"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are automakers overcharging consumers for electric vehicle batteries?\",\"authors\":\"Tamara L. Sheldon ,&nbsp;Rubal Dua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the recent slowdown in EV adoption rates in many countries despite decreasing battery prices, a better understanding the relationship between battery and EV prices is critical for industry and policymakers. We fill this gap in the literature by assessing to what extent ongoing increases in EV battery capacities have increased EV prices, and how this compares with actual EV battery prices. Specifically, we use fixed effects regression analysis to investigate the responsiveness of EV list prices to changes in battery capacity over time, finding evidence that increases in battery capacity led to increases in EV prices that are substantially greater than estimated EV battery costs over our sample. This suggests that automakers may be overcharging consumers for EV batteries and that recent decreases in battery prices are not fully benefiting consumers. This, in turn, suggests that EV prices have been higher than they otherwise could have been, which may have led to slower EV adoption in recent years.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Strategy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,尽管电池价格下降,但许多国家的电动汽车采用率却在放缓,因此,更好地理解电池和电动汽车价格之间的关系对于行业和政策制定者来说至关重要。我们通过评估电动汽车电池容量的持续增长在多大程度上提高了电动汽车价格,以及这与实际电动汽车电池价格的对比,填补了文献中的这一空白。具体而言,我们使用固定效应回归分析法来研究电动汽车上市价格对电池容量随时间变化的反应,发现有证据表明,在我们的样本中,电池容量的增加导致电动汽车价格的增长大大高于估计的电动汽车电池成本。这表明,汽车制造商可能向消费者收取了过多的电动汽车电池费用,而近期电池价格的下降并未使消费者充分受益。这反过来又表明,电动汽车的价格一直高于本来的水平,这可能导致近年来电动汽车的普及速度放缓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are automakers overcharging consumers for electric vehicle batteries?
Given the recent slowdown in EV adoption rates in many countries despite decreasing battery prices, a better understanding the relationship between battery and EV prices is critical for industry and policymakers. We fill this gap in the literature by assessing to what extent ongoing increases in EV battery capacities have increased EV prices, and how this compares with actual EV battery prices. Specifically, we use fixed effects regression analysis to investigate the responsiveness of EV list prices to changes in battery capacity over time, finding evidence that increases in battery capacity led to increases in EV prices that are substantially greater than estimated EV battery costs over our sample. This suggests that automakers may be overcharging consumers for EV batteries and that recent decreases in battery prices are not fully benefiting consumers. This, in turn, suggests that EV prices have been higher than they otherwise could have been, which may have led to slower EV adoption in recent years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信