{"title":"行走时使用足部矫形器对成人扁平足患者下肢关节角度和力矩的影响:系统综述与 Meta 分析","authors":"AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero , Ali Esmaeili , Seyed Hamed Mousavi , Urs Granacher","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review with <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of foot orthoses (FO) application on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flexible flat-feet during walking. The following five databases were systematically searched from inception until March 2024: Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Between-group standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were computed using a random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup>-index. Twenty-four studies were identified and <em>meta</em>-analyzed. Studies were then categorized according to the applied flat-feet assessment method: (1) foot posture index (FPI-6) or clinical observation; (2) foot print arch index or radiography; (3) arch height index (including navicular drop, the arch height index, navicular height normalized to foot length [NNHT]); (4) forefoot varus method; (5) rearfoot eversion or resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP). The <em>meta</em>-analysis showed significant effects of FO application during walking on peak rearfoot eversion (ten studies: moderate SMDs), peak ankle dorsiflexion (five studies: small SMDs), and eversion (seven studies: moderate SMDs). This <em>meta</em>-analysis indicated significant effects of FO application on peak ankle eversion moment (five studies: small SMDs) and peak knee adduction moment (six studies: small SMDs). We observed greater effects of FO application on walking mechanics in the studies that used the FPI-6 method for the assessment of foot posture. Since previous research showed particularly high test–retest reliability measures for the FPI-6 method, we recommend to uniformly use this type of foot posture measure in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 112345"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of foot orthoses application during walking on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flat Feet: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero , Ali Esmaeili , Seyed Hamed Mousavi , Urs Granacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic review with <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of foot orthoses (FO) application on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flexible flat-feet during walking. The following five databases were systematically searched from inception until March 2024: Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Between-group standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were computed using a random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup>-index. Twenty-four studies were identified and <em>meta</em>-analyzed. Studies were then categorized according to the applied flat-feet assessment method: (1) foot posture index (FPI-6) or clinical observation; (2) foot print arch index or radiography; (3) arch height index (including navicular drop, the arch height index, navicular height normalized to foot length [NNHT]); (4) forefoot varus method; (5) rearfoot eversion or resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP). The <em>meta</em>-analysis showed significant effects of FO application during walking on peak rearfoot eversion (ten studies: moderate SMDs), peak ankle dorsiflexion (five studies: small SMDs), and eversion (seven studies: moderate SMDs). This <em>meta</em>-analysis indicated significant effects of FO application on peak ankle eversion moment (five studies: small SMDs) and peak knee adduction moment (six studies: small SMDs). We observed greater effects of FO application on walking mechanics in the studies that used the FPI-6 method for the assessment of foot posture. Since previous research showed particularly high test–retest reliability measures for the FPI-6 method, we recommend to uniformly use this type of foot posture measure in future studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of foot orthoses application during walking on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flat Feet: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis
This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of foot orthoses (FO) application on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flexible flat-feet during walking. The following five databases were systematically searched from inception until March 2024: Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Between-group standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were computed using a random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2-index. Twenty-four studies were identified and meta-analyzed. Studies were then categorized according to the applied flat-feet assessment method: (1) foot posture index (FPI-6) or clinical observation; (2) foot print arch index or radiography; (3) arch height index (including navicular drop, the arch height index, navicular height normalized to foot length [NNHT]); (4) forefoot varus method; (5) rearfoot eversion or resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP). The meta-analysis showed significant effects of FO application during walking on peak rearfoot eversion (ten studies: moderate SMDs), peak ankle dorsiflexion (five studies: small SMDs), and eversion (seven studies: moderate SMDs). This meta-analysis indicated significant effects of FO application on peak ankle eversion moment (five studies: small SMDs) and peak knee adduction moment (six studies: small SMDs). We observed greater effects of FO application on walking mechanics in the studies that used the FPI-6 method for the assessment of foot posture. Since previous research showed particularly high test–retest reliability measures for the FPI-6 method, we recommend to uniformly use this type of foot posture measure in future studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.