Xiaojing Zhao, Haoxiang Xiong, Kai Song, Laiyuan Yu, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lujia Han
{"title":"生物质粉煤灰和沼气残渣热解炭对 Cu (II) 的吸附行为和机理的系统比较","authors":"Xiaojing Zhao, Haoxiang Xiong, Kai Song, Laiyuan Yu, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lujia Han","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass fly ash (BFA) and biogas residues are the main by-products of biomass direct-fired power generation and biogas production. This study compares the Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms of BFA and biogas residue pyrolysis char (BRPC) through systematic tests. BFA exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity (75.34 mg/g) than BRPC (42.80 mg/g). The pseudo-first-order kinetic model best described BFA, while the Elovich model was optimal for BRPC. Both materials fit the Freundlich isotherm model. BFA's superior mineral co-precipitation and ion-exchange capacity are due to its rich mineral content, particularly calcium. BRPC benefits from an additional functional group complex adsorption due to its pyrolytic charcoal content. Variations in pore structure of BFA and BRPC did not demonstrate a significant effect on the adsorption. The results of this study provide essential data support for the potential of high-value utilization of BFA and BRPC and the innovative modification of high-performance biomass-based heavy metal adsorbent materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101959"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematical comparation of Cu (II) adsorption behavior and mechanism between biomass fly ash and biogas residue pyrolysis char\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojing Zhao, Haoxiang Xiong, Kai Song, Laiyuan Yu, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lujia Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biomass fly ash (BFA) and biogas residues are the main by-products of biomass direct-fired power generation and biogas production. This study compares the Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms of BFA and biogas residue pyrolysis char (BRPC) through systematic tests. BFA exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity (75.34 mg/g) than BRPC (42.80 mg/g). The pseudo-first-order kinetic model best described BFA, while the Elovich model was optimal for BRPC. Both materials fit the Freundlich isotherm model. BFA's superior mineral co-precipitation and ion-exchange capacity are due to its rich mineral content, particularly calcium. BRPC benefits from an additional functional group complex adsorption due to its pyrolytic charcoal content. Variations in pore structure of BFA and BRPC did not demonstrate a significant effect on the adsorption. The results of this study provide essential data support for the potential of high-value utilization of BFA and BRPC and the innovative modification of high-performance biomass-based heavy metal adsorbent materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X24002007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X24002007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematical comparation of Cu (II) adsorption behavior and mechanism between biomass fly ash and biogas residue pyrolysis char
Biomass fly ash (BFA) and biogas residues are the main by-products of biomass direct-fired power generation and biogas production. This study compares the Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms of BFA and biogas residue pyrolysis char (BRPC) through systematic tests. BFA exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity (75.34 mg/g) than BRPC (42.80 mg/g). The pseudo-first-order kinetic model best described BFA, while the Elovich model was optimal for BRPC. Both materials fit the Freundlich isotherm model. BFA's superior mineral co-precipitation and ion-exchange capacity are due to its rich mineral content, particularly calcium. BRPC benefits from an additional functional group complex adsorption due to its pyrolytic charcoal content. Variations in pore structure of BFA and BRPC did not demonstrate a significant effect on the adsorption. The results of this study provide essential data support for the potential of high-value utilization of BFA and BRPC and the innovative modification of high-performance biomass-based heavy metal adsorbent materials.