Mayada A. Youssef , Moawiah Awad Alghizzawi , Faozi A. Almaqtari , Heba El-Sayed , Esam Moustafa
{"title":"影响教师对会计课程改革承诺的关键因素:阿联酋和英国 AACSB 认证大学之间的差异","authors":"Mayada A. Youssef , Moawiah Awad Alghizzawi , Faozi A. Almaqtari , Heba El-Sayed , Esam Moustafa","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the relationship among change management, transformational leadership, organizational culture, and faculty members’ commitment to accounting curriculum change in universities accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Survey data were collected from accounting faculty members in the UK and UAE (n = 202) and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results are interpreted using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. This paper contributes to understanding faculty commitment to curriculum changes at AACSB-accredited universities in the UAE and UK by providing empirical evidence that change management positively influences faculty affective and normative commitments, with a greater impact in the UAE. It reveals the nuanced effects of transformational leadership on faculty commitments across cultural contexts. It challenges previous assumptions about organizational culture’s impact on commitment to change, and highlights the importance of demographic factors such as gender and academic rank. The study emphasizes the critical role of long-term accreditation and offers practical recommendations for culturally sensitive change management strategies, while also identifying areas for future research to address its limitations. This study contributes significantly to the literature on change management and academic accounting education. It also has practical implications for higher education institutions who are considering changing their accounting curricula, particularly for accreditation purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities\",\"authors\":\"Mayada A. Youssef , Moawiah Awad Alghizzawi , Faozi A. Almaqtari , Heba El-Sayed , Esam Moustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the relationship among change management, transformational leadership, organizational culture, and faculty members’ commitment to accounting curriculum change in universities accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Survey data were collected from accounting faculty members in the UK and UAE (n = 202) and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results are interpreted using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. This paper contributes to understanding faculty commitment to curriculum changes at AACSB-accredited universities in the UAE and UK by providing empirical evidence that change management positively influences faculty affective and normative commitments, with a greater impact in the UAE. It reveals the nuanced effects of transformational leadership on faculty commitments across cultural contexts. It challenges previous assumptions about organizational culture’s impact on commitment to change, and highlights the importance of demographic factors such as gender and academic rank. The study emphasizes the critical role of long-term accreditation and offers practical recommendations for culturally sensitive change management strategies, while also identifying areas for future research to address its limitations. This study contributes significantly to the literature on change management and academic accounting education. It also has practical implications for higher education institutions who are considering changing their accounting curricula, particularly for accreditation purposes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
This study examines the relationship among change management, transformational leadership, organizational culture, and faculty members’ commitment to accounting curriculum change in universities accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) in the United Kingdom (UK) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Survey data were collected from accounting faculty members in the UK and UAE (n = 202) and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results are interpreted using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. This paper contributes to understanding faculty commitment to curriculum changes at AACSB-accredited universities in the UAE and UK by providing empirical evidence that change management positively influences faculty affective and normative commitments, with a greater impact in the UAE. It reveals the nuanced effects of transformational leadership on faculty commitments across cultural contexts. It challenges previous assumptions about organizational culture’s impact on commitment to change, and highlights the importance of demographic factors such as gender and academic rank. The study emphasizes the critical role of long-term accreditation and offers practical recommendations for culturally sensitive change management strategies, while also identifying areas for future research to address its limitations. This study contributes significantly to the literature on change management and academic accounting education. It also has practical implications for higher education institutions who are considering changing their accounting curricula, particularly for accreditation purposes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.