{"title":"重新评估 Altingiaceae 的花粉分化:利用多元统计和机器学习区分落叶(Liquidambar)和常绿(Altingia)类型的挑战","authors":"Shunjie Zhang , Limi Mao , Yangjun Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2024.105209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Altingiaceae, a family of woody plants, comprising evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em> groups, exhibits distinct leaf morphology, yet both groups overlap in geographical range and climatic conditions. While some tropical <em>Altingia</em> species are confined to Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and India without <em>Liquidambar</em>, and some temperate <em>Liquidambar</em> species to northern China without <em>Altingia</em>. Their fossil pollen have significant implications in reconstructing palaeoclimate and historical biogeography, based on classification of <em>Altingia</em>-type and <em>Liquidambar</em>-type. However, the results of previous studies to differentiate pollen types of evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em> were based on limited pollen specimens. Therefore pollen morphology of Altingiaceae and differentiation of above mentioned types needs reevaluation using more specimens from wider geographical range.</div><div>In this study, we present new findings on Altingiaceae pollen morphology from extensive collection of specimens and reassess the diagnostic features to distinguish evergreen and deciduous types. To improve the credibility of palaeoecological and palaeoclimatic interpretations, we applied multivariate statistical analyses to pollen size, number of pores, pollen wall thickness, and size and density of ornamental elements from light microscopy (LM) and Scanning Electronic Microscope (SEM) images. Additionally, random forest classification models were applied to test the accuracy of differentiating Altingiaceae pollen types. Our results reveal significant morphological overlap between the pollen of evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em>, with classification models showing limited accuracy and explainability. Thus, fossil pollen of Altingiaceae cannot be confidently classified into evergreen or deciduous types, highlighting challenges in using their pollen morphology for taxonomic classification in palaeoecological research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54488,"journal":{"name":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","volume":"331 ","pages":"Article 105209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluation of pollen differentiation in Altingiaceae: Challenges in distinguishing deciduous (Liquidambar) and evergreen (Altingia) types using multivariate statistics and machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Shunjie Zhang , Limi Mao , Yangjun Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2024.105209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Altingiaceae, a family of woody plants, comprising evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em> groups, exhibits distinct leaf morphology, yet both groups overlap in geographical range and climatic conditions. While some tropical <em>Altingia</em> species are confined to Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and India without <em>Liquidambar</em>, and some temperate <em>Liquidambar</em> species to northern China without <em>Altingia</em>. Their fossil pollen have significant implications in reconstructing palaeoclimate and historical biogeography, based on classification of <em>Altingia</em>-type and <em>Liquidambar</em>-type. However, the results of previous studies to differentiate pollen types of evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em> were based on limited pollen specimens. Therefore pollen morphology of Altingiaceae and differentiation of above mentioned types needs reevaluation using more specimens from wider geographical range.</div><div>In this study, we present new findings on Altingiaceae pollen morphology from extensive collection of specimens and reassess the diagnostic features to distinguish evergreen and deciduous types. To improve the credibility of palaeoecological and palaeoclimatic interpretations, we applied multivariate statistical analyses to pollen size, number of pores, pollen wall thickness, and size and density of ornamental elements from light microscopy (LM) and Scanning Electronic Microscope (SEM) images. Additionally, random forest classification models were applied to test the accuracy of differentiating Altingiaceae pollen types. Our results reveal significant morphological overlap between the pollen of evergreen <em>Altingia</em> and deciduous <em>Liquidambar</em>, with classification models showing limited accuracy and explainability. Thus, fossil pollen of Altingiaceae cannot be confidently classified into evergreen or deciduous types, highlighting challenges in using their pollen morphology for taxonomic classification in palaeoecological research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology\",\"volume\":\"331 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003466672400160X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003466672400160X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reevaluation of pollen differentiation in Altingiaceae: Challenges in distinguishing deciduous (Liquidambar) and evergreen (Altingia) types using multivariate statistics and machine learning
Altingiaceae, a family of woody plants, comprising evergreen Altingia and deciduous Liquidambar groups, exhibits distinct leaf morphology, yet both groups overlap in geographical range and climatic conditions. While some tropical Altingia species are confined to Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and India without Liquidambar, and some temperate Liquidambar species to northern China without Altingia. Their fossil pollen have significant implications in reconstructing palaeoclimate and historical biogeography, based on classification of Altingia-type and Liquidambar-type. However, the results of previous studies to differentiate pollen types of evergreen Altingia and deciduous Liquidambar were based on limited pollen specimens. Therefore pollen morphology of Altingiaceae and differentiation of above mentioned types needs reevaluation using more specimens from wider geographical range.
In this study, we present new findings on Altingiaceae pollen morphology from extensive collection of specimens and reassess the diagnostic features to distinguish evergreen and deciduous types. To improve the credibility of palaeoecological and palaeoclimatic interpretations, we applied multivariate statistical analyses to pollen size, number of pores, pollen wall thickness, and size and density of ornamental elements from light microscopy (LM) and Scanning Electronic Microscope (SEM) images. Additionally, random forest classification models were applied to test the accuracy of differentiating Altingiaceae pollen types. Our results reveal significant morphological overlap between the pollen of evergreen Altingia and deciduous Liquidambar, with classification models showing limited accuracy and explainability. Thus, fossil pollen of Altingiaceae cannot be confidently classified into evergreen or deciduous types, highlighting challenges in using their pollen morphology for taxonomic classification in palaeoecological research.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology is an international journal for articles in all fields of palaeobotany and palynology dealing with all groups, ranging from marine palynomorphs to higher land plants. Original contributions and comprehensive review papers should appeal to an international audience. Typical topics include but are not restricted to systematics, evolution, palaeobiology, palaeoecology, biostratigraphy, biochronology, palaeoclimatology, paleogeography, taphonomy, palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, vegetation history, and practical applications of palaeobotany and palynology, e.g. in coal and petroleum geology and archaeology. The journal especially encourages the publication of articles in which palaeobotany and palynology are applied for solving fundamental geological and biological problems as well as innovative and interdisciplinary approaches.