不同灭活剂对百日咳疫苗效力、毒性及稳定性的影响

R.K. Gupta , Suniti B. Sharma , Subhash Ahuja , S.N. Saxena
{"title":"不同灭活剂对百日咳疫苗效力、毒性及稳定性的影响","authors":"R.K. Gupta ,&nbsp;Suniti B. Sharma ,&nbsp;Subhash Ahuja ,&nbsp;S.N. Saxena","doi":"10.1016/0092-1157(87)90020-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effect of heat (56 °C for 10 min), formaldehyde (0·1% at 37 °C for 24h), glutaraldehyde (0·05% at room temperature for 10 min), thimerosal (0·02% at 37 °C for 24 h), acetone-I (three treatments at room temperature) and acetone-II (three treatments at room temperature and fourth treatment at 37 °C), when used as inactivating agents in the preparation of pertussis suspension, was studied with regard to potency, toxicity and stability. Five batches each of <em>Bordetella pertussis</em> strains 134 and 509 were used for the study. The thimerosal inactivated pertussis (TIP) preparation was 1·5−2 times more potent than the heat inactivated pertussis (HIP) preparation. The potency values of the formaldehyde inactivated pertussis (FIP) and glutaraldehyde inactivated pertussis (GIP) preparations were similar to those of the HIP preparation, while the potencies of the acetone-I treated pertussis (A(I)TP) and acetone-II treated pertussis (A(II)TP) preparations were about half those of the HIP preparation. The FIP preparation was the least toxic showing maximum weight gain in the mouse weight-gain test (MGWT), while the TIP preparation did not pass the MWGT. The weight gains shown the GIP, A(I)TP and A(II)TP preparations were greater than those shown by the HIP preparation. The potency of pertussis component in the adsorbed diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine was stable at 4–8 °C and 25 °C for three months for all types of pertussis vaccine. There was about 54–65% loss in the potency of the samples after three months at 35 °C. The inactivating agents used in the manufacture of pertussis preparations had no effect on the stability of the vaccine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 87-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(87)90020-5","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of different inactivating agents on the potency, toxicity and stability of pertussis vaccine\",\"authors\":\"R.K. Gupta ,&nbsp;Suniti B. Sharma ,&nbsp;Subhash Ahuja ,&nbsp;S.N. Saxena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0092-1157(87)90020-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effect of heat (56 °C for 10 min), formaldehyde (0·1% at 37 °C for 24h), glutaraldehyde (0·05% at room temperature for 10 min), thimerosal (0·02% at 37 °C for 24 h), acetone-I (three treatments at room temperature) and acetone-II (three treatments at room temperature and fourth treatment at 37 °C), when used as inactivating agents in the preparation of pertussis suspension, was studied with regard to potency, toxicity and stability. Five batches each of <em>Bordetella pertussis</em> strains 134 and 509 were used for the study. The thimerosal inactivated pertussis (TIP) preparation was 1·5−2 times more potent than the heat inactivated pertussis (HIP) preparation. The potency values of the formaldehyde inactivated pertussis (FIP) and glutaraldehyde inactivated pertussis (GIP) preparations were similar to those of the HIP preparation, while the potencies of the acetone-I treated pertussis (A(I)TP) and acetone-II treated pertussis (A(II)TP) preparations were about half those of the HIP preparation. The FIP preparation was the least toxic showing maximum weight gain in the mouse weight-gain test (MGWT), while the TIP preparation did not pass the MWGT. The weight gains shown the GIP, A(I)TP and A(II)TP preparations were greater than those shown by the HIP preparation. The potency of pertussis component in the adsorbed diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine was stable at 4–8 °C and 25 °C for three months for all types of pertussis vaccine. There was about 54–65% loss in the potency of the samples after three months at 35 °C. The inactivating agents used in the manufacture of pertussis preparations had no effect on the stability of the vaccine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 87-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(87)90020-5\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115787900205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115787900205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

研究了热(56℃,10 min)、甲醛(0.1%,37℃,24h)、戊二醛(0.05%,室温,10 min)、硫柳汞(0.02%,37℃,24h)、丙酮- 1(室温,3个处理)、丙酮- 2(室温,3个处理,37℃,4个处理)作为灭活剂制备百日咳混悬液的效力、毒性和稳定性。研究采用百日咳杆菌134株和509株各5批。硫柳汞灭活百日咳(TIP)制剂的效力是热灭活百日咳(HIP)制剂的1.5 ~ 2倍。甲醛灭活百日咳(FIP)和戊二醛灭活百日咳(GIP)制剂的效力值与HIP制剂相似,而丙酮-I处理百日咳(A(I)TP)和丙酮-II处理百日咳(A(II)TP)制剂的效力约为HIP制剂的一半。在小鼠增重试验(MGWT)中,FIP制剂毒性最小,增重最大,而TIP制剂未通过MWGT。体重增加表明,GIP、A(I)TP和A(II)TP制剂比HIP制剂更大。吸附百日咳-百日咳-破伤风(DPT)疫苗中百日咳成分的效力在4-8°C和25°C下稳定3个月,所有类型的百日咳疫苗。样品在35℃下放置3个月后,效力损失约54-65%。百日咳制剂生产中使用的灭活剂对疫苗的稳定性没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of different inactivating agents on the potency, toxicity and stability of pertussis vaccine

The effect of heat (56 °C for 10 min), formaldehyde (0·1% at 37 °C for 24h), glutaraldehyde (0·05% at room temperature for 10 min), thimerosal (0·02% at 37 °C for 24 h), acetone-I (three treatments at room temperature) and acetone-II (three treatments at room temperature and fourth treatment at 37 °C), when used as inactivating agents in the preparation of pertussis suspension, was studied with regard to potency, toxicity and stability. Five batches each of Bordetella pertussis strains 134 and 509 were used for the study. The thimerosal inactivated pertussis (TIP) preparation was 1·5−2 times more potent than the heat inactivated pertussis (HIP) preparation. The potency values of the formaldehyde inactivated pertussis (FIP) and glutaraldehyde inactivated pertussis (GIP) preparations were similar to those of the HIP preparation, while the potencies of the acetone-I treated pertussis (A(I)TP) and acetone-II treated pertussis (A(II)TP) preparations were about half those of the HIP preparation. The FIP preparation was the least toxic showing maximum weight gain in the mouse weight-gain test (MGWT), while the TIP preparation did not pass the MWGT. The weight gains shown the GIP, A(I)TP and A(II)TP preparations were greater than those shown by the HIP preparation. The potency of pertussis component in the adsorbed diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine was stable at 4–8 °C and 25 °C for three months for all types of pertussis vaccine. There was about 54–65% loss in the potency of the samples after three months at 35 °C. The inactivating agents used in the manufacture of pertussis preparations had no effect on the stability of the vaccine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信