高心血管风险患者的疾病功能和生活质量与抑郁和焦虑症患病率的关系。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Piotr Michalski, Agata Kosobucka-Ozdoba, Łukasz Pietrzykowski, Michał Kasprzak, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Alicja Rzepka-Cholasińska, Aldona Kubica
{"title":"高心血管风险患者的疾病功能和生活质量与抑郁和焦虑症患病率的关系。","authors":"Piotr Michalski, Agata Kosobucka-Ozdoba, Łukasz Pietrzykowski, Michał Kasprzak, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Alicja Rzepka-Cholasińska, Aldona Kubica","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14030191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A chronic disease occurring in a person's life is a stressor, disrupting every aspect of their life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between functioning in chronic illness and quality of life with the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with high cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included 200 patients (aged 18-80 years) under the care of a primary care physician, diagnosed with hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia, and/or diabetes between 6 and 24 months before the enrollment. The presented analysis assessed the symptoms of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease using the Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) questionnaire and functioning in chronic illness using the Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale (FCIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HADS scores amounted to 4.34 ± 3.414 points for the HADS-Anxiety subscale and 3.20 ± 2.979 points for the HADS-Depression subscale. The score indicative of functioning in chronic illness assessed with the FCIS was 98.32 ± 13.89 points. The independent predictors of HADS-anxiety were HeartQoL Emotional and FCIS Global, while HeartQoL Global and FCIS Global were the independent predictors for HADS-depression. Better functioning in chronic illness (FCIS Global) was associated with less frequent symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.3969; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.5884; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Higher HeartQoL scores, both globally, as well as in emotional and physical dimensions, were associated with a lower severity of anxiety and depression assessed with the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.2909; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.2583; <i>p</i> = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of life and functioning in chronic illness are connected with symptoms of depression and anxiety. When assessing the severity of the depression symptoms in relation to the individual aspects of functioning in chronic illness, the areas requiring supportive-educational intervention can be identified. The assessment of both functioning in a chronic disease and the severity of the depression symptoms should be included in a standard nursing diagnosis and further supportive and educational intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"14 3","pages":"2596-2604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functioning in an Illness and Quality of Life versus the Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Michalski, Agata Kosobucka-Ozdoba, Łukasz Pietrzykowski, Michał Kasprzak, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Alicja Rzepka-Cholasińska, Aldona Kubica\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep14030191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A chronic disease occurring in a person's life is a stressor, disrupting every aspect of their life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between functioning in chronic illness and quality of life with the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with high cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included 200 patients (aged 18-80 years) under the care of a primary care physician, diagnosed with hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia, and/or diabetes between 6 and 24 months before the enrollment. The presented analysis assessed the symptoms of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease using the Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) questionnaire and functioning in chronic illness using the Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale (FCIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HADS scores amounted to 4.34 ± 3.414 points for the HADS-Anxiety subscale and 3.20 ± 2.979 points for the HADS-Depression subscale. The score indicative of functioning in chronic illness assessed with the FCIS was 98.32 ± 13.89 points. The independent predictors of HADS-anxiety were HeartQoL Emotional and FCIS Global, while HeartQoL Global and FCIS Global were the independent predictors for HADS-depression. Better functioning in chronic illness (FCIS Global) was associated with less frequent symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.3969; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.5884; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Higher HeartQoL scores, both globally, as well as in emotional and physical dimensions, were associated with a lower severity of anxiety and depression assessed with the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.2909; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.2583; <i>p</i> = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of life and functioning in chronic illness are connected with symptoms of depression and anxiety. When assessing the severity of the depression symptoms in relation to the individual aspects of functioning in chronic illness, the areas requiring supportive-educational intervention can be identified. The assessment of both functioning in a chronic disease and the severity of the depression symptoms should be included in a standard nursing diagnosis and further supportive and educational intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"2596-2604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在人的一生中,慢性疾病是一种压力,会扰乱其生活的方方面面:本研究旨在评估心血管疾病高危患者的慢性病功能和生活质量与抑郁和焦虑症状发生率之间的关系:本研究纳入了 200 名接受初级保健医生治疗的患者(18-80 岁),他们在入组前 6-24 个月期间被诊断出患有高血压和/或高胆固醇血症和/或糖尿病。本次分析使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估了焦虑和抑郁症状;使用心脏生活质量(HeartQoL)问卷评估了心血管疾病患者的生活质量;使用慢性病功能量表(FCIS)评估了慢性病患者的功能:HADS焦虑分量表的得分为(4.34 ± 3.414)分,HADS抑郁分量表的得分为(3.20 ± 2.979)分。用 FCIS 评估的慢性病功能得分为 98.32 ± 13.89 分。HADS-焦虑的独立预测因子是HeartQoL Emotional和FCIS Global,而HeartQoL Global和FCIS Global是HADS-抑郁的独立预测因子。较好的慢性病功能(FCIS Global)与较少出现基于 HADS 的焦虑和抑郁症状有关:HADS-焦虑(R Spearmann = -0.3969;p < 0.0001)和 HADS-抑郁(R Spearmann = -0.5884;p < 0.0001)。无论是总体还是情绪和身体方面,较高的 HeartQoL 分数都与 HADS 评估的焦虑和抑郁严重程度较低有关:HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.2909; p = 0.0001) 和 HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.2583; p = 0.0002):结论:慢性病患者的生活质量和功能与抑郁和焦虑症状有关。在评估抑郁症状的严重程度与慢性病患者个人功能方面的关系时,可以确定需要支持性教育干预的领域。对慢性病患者功能和抑郁症状严重程度的评估应纳入标准护理诊断和进一步的支持和教育干预中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functioning in an Illness and Quality of Life versus the Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.

Background: A chronic disease occurring in a person's life is a stressor, disrupting every aspect of their life.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the relationship between functioning in chronic illness and quality of life with the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Material and methods: This study included 200 patients (aged 18-80 years) under the care of a primary care physician, diagnosed with hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia, and/or diabetes between 6 and 24 months before the enrollment. The presented analysis assessed the symptoms of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); and the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease using the Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) questionnaire and functioning in chronic illness using the Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale (FCIS).

Results: The HADS scores amounted to 4.34 ± 3.414 points for the HADS-Anxiety subscale and 3.20 ± 2.979 points for the HADS-Depression subscale. The score indicative of functioning in chronic illness assessed with the FCIS was 98.32 ± 13.89 points. The independent predictors of HADS-anxiety were HeartQoL Emotional and FCIS Global, while HeartQoL Global and FCIS Global were the independent predictors for HADS-depression. Better functioning in chronic illness (FCIS Global) was associated with less frequent symptoms of anxiety and depression based on the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.3969; p < 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.5884; p < 0.0001). Higher HeartQoL scores, both globally, as well as in emotional and physical dimensions, were associated with a lower severity of anxiety and depression assessed with the HADS: HADS-Anxiety (R Spearmann = -0.2909; p = 0.0001) and HADS-Depression (R Spearmann = -0.2583; p = 0.0002).

Conclusions: The quality of life and functioning in chronic illness are connected with symptoms of depression and anxiety. When assessing the severity of the depression symptoms in relation to the individual aspects of functioning in chronic illness, the areas requiring supportive-educational intervention can be identified. The assessment of both functioning in a chronic disease and the severity of the depression symptoms should be included in a standard nursing diagnosis and further supportive and educational intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信