Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey
{"title":"头孢他啶、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦和美罗培南/伐巴坦对耐万古霉素肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在小鼠体内定植的影响","authors":"Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey","doi":"10.20411/pai.v9i2.711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (<3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool through day 15 (<i>P</i><0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (peak concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool) (<i>P</i><0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36419,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> in Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan S Hausman, Samir Memic, Jennifer L Cadnum, Elizabeth G Zink, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey\",\"doi\":\"10.20411/pai.v9i2.711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (<3 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool through day 15 (<i>P</i><0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (peak concentration, >8 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool) (<i>P</i><0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v9i2.711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20411/pai.v9i2.711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Ceftaroline, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, and Meropenem/Vaborbactam on Establishment of Colonization by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice.
Background: The potential for promotion of intestinal colonization with healthcare-associated pathogens by new antibiotics used to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is unclear.
Methods: Mice treated for 3 days with daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline (control), ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, and meropenem/vaborbactam were challenged with 10,000 colony-forming units (CFU) of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) resistant to each of the antibioics or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 1 day after the final treatment dose. The concentrations of VRE or K. pneumoniae in stool were measured on days 1, 3, 6, and 15 after challenge.
Results: Control mice had transient low levels of VRE or K. pneumoniae (<3 log10 CFU/g) detected in stool with negative cultures on days 6 and 15 after challenge. In comparison to control mice, each of the antibiotics promoted establishment of high-density colonization with VRE (mean concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool on day 1 after challenge) that persisted at >4 log10 CFU/g of stool through day 15 (P<0.01). In comparison to control mice, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftaroline promoted high-density colonization with K. pneumoniae (peak concentration, >8 log10 CFU/g of stool) (P<0.01), ceftolozane/tazobactam promoted colonization to a lesser degree (peak concentration, >5 log10 CFU/g of stool), and ceftazidime/avibactam did not promote colonization (P>0.05).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that several beta-lactam antibiotics recently developed for treatment of infections with resistant Gram-negative bacilli have the potential to promote colonization by healthcare-associated pathogens. Additional studies are needed to examine the impact of these agents in patients.