{"title":"[基于郑州夏季光化学损失的 VOCs 特征、来源分析及环境影响]。","authors":"Zhuo Li, Bing Wang, Tian-Tian Wang, Dong Zhang, Xin-Shuai Song, Ming-Hao Yuan, Xuan Lu, Wen-Ju Wang, Sha-Sha Yin, Rui-Qin Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial <i>φ</i>(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10<sup>-9</sup> and (35.92 ±15.30)×10<sup>-9</sup>,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) > Gangli Reservoir (GLR) > Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O<sub>3</sub> and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"45 9","pages":"5157-5167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Characteristics, Sources Analysis, and Environmental Impacts of VOCs Based on Photochemical Loss in Summer in Zhengzhou].\",\"authors\":\"Zhuo Li, Bing Wang, Tian-Tian Wang, Dong Zhang, Xin-Shuai Song, Ming-Hao Yuan, Xuan Lu, Wen-Ju Wang, Sha-Sha Yin, Rui-Qin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial <i>φ</i>(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10<sup>-9</sup> and (35.92 ±15.30)×10<sup>-9</sup>,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) > Gangli Reservoir (GLR) > Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O<sub>3</sub> and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"5157-5167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Characteristics, Sources Analysis, and Environmental Impacts of VOCs Based on Photochemical Loss in Summer in Zhengzhou].
To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial φ(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10-9 and (35.92 ±15.30)×10-9,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) > Gangli Reservoir (GLR) > Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O3 and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.