[基于郑州夏季光化学损失的 VOCs 特征、来源分析及环境影响]。

Q2 Environmental Science
Zhuo Li, Bing Wang, Tian-Tian Wang, Dong Zhang, Xin-Shuai Song, Ming-Hao Yuan, Xuan Lu, Wen-Ju Wang, Sha-Sha Yin, Rui-Qin Zhang
{"title":"[基于郑州夏季光化学损失的 VOCs 特征、来源分析及环境影响]。","authors":"Zhuo Li, Bing Wang, Tian-Tian Wang, Dong Zhang, Xin-Shuai Song, Ming-Hao Yuan, Xuan Lu, Wen-Ju Wang, Sha-Sha Yin, Rui-Qin Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial <i>φ</i>(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10<sup>-9</sup> and (35.92 ±15.30)×10<sup>-9</sup>,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) &gt; Gangli Reservoir (GLR) &gt; Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O<sub>3</sub> and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"45 9","pages":"5157-5167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Characteristics, Sources Analysis, and Environmental Impacts of VOCs Based on Photochemical Loss in Summer in Zhengzhou].\",\"authors\":\"Zhuo Li, Bing Wang, Tian-Tian Wang, Dong Zhang, Xin-Shuai Song, Ming-Hao Yuan, Xuan Lu, Wen-Ju Wang, Sha-Sha Yin, Rui-Qin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial <i>φ</i>(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10<sup>-9</sup> and (35.92 ±15.30)×10<sup>-9</sup>,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) &gt; Gangli Reservoir (GLR) &gt; Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O<sub>3</sub> and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"5157-5167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为明确郑州市夏季大气挥发性有机物的污染特征和来源,2022 年 8 月对郑州市大气挥发性有机物进行了多点离线采样和实验室分析。比较了观测值和初始值的 VOC 体积分数水平、OFP、SOAFP 和来源。研究期间,三地观测值和初始值φ(VOCs)的平均值分别为(31.0%)、(31.0%)、(31.0%)和(31.0%)。分别为(31.83 ±13.51)×10-9 和(35.92 ±15.30)×10-9。烯烃(52.5)和芳香烃(29.7)各观测点观测到的 TVOCs 浓度空间变化情况为:郑州大学(ZZU)>;岗李水库(GLR)各观测点的烷烃和 OVOCs 浓度均较高。烯烃和芳香烃是形成 O3 和 SOA 的主要成分。机动车源、溶剂使用源和工业源是郑州大气中 VOCs 的主要贡献源。与基于初始浓度的来源分析结果相比,机动车源、工业源和溶剂使用源的贡献率相对较高,燃烧源、工厂源和油气挥发源的贡献率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Characteristics, Sources Analysis, and Environmental Impacts of VOCs Based on Photochemical Loss in Summer in Zhengzhou].

To clarify the pollution characteristics and sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou City in the summer, multi-site offline sampling and laboratory analyses of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou were carried out in August 2022. The observed and initial VOC volume fraction levels, OFP, SOAFP, and sources were compared. During the study period, the average values of three-site observation and initial φ(VOCs) during the study period were (31.83 ±13.51)×10-9 and (35.92 ±15.30)×10-9,respectively. Olefins (52.5 %) and aromatic hydrocarbons (29.7 %) were the components with a higher photochemical loss rate, and the spatial variations of the observed TVOCs concentration at each site were: Zhengzhou University (ZZU) > Gangli Reservoir (GLR) > Jingkaiqu (JKQ), and the concentrations of alkanes and OVOCs at each site were higher. Olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons were the components that contributed greatly to the formation of O3 and SOA. Motor vehicle sources, solvent-use sources, and industrial sources were the main contributing sources of atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou. Compared with the source analysis results based on the initial concentration, the contribution rates of motor vehicle sources, industrial sources, and solvent use sources were relatively high, and the contribution rates of combustion sources, plant sources, and oil and gas volatilization sources were relatively low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信