确定可切除直肠癌早期复发的时间和风险因素:单中心回顾性研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tsung-Jung Tsai, Kai-Jyun Syu, Xuan-Yuan Huang, Yu Shih Liu, Chang-Wei Chen, Yen-Hang Wu, Ching-Min Lin, Yu-Yao Chang
{"title":"确定可切除直肠癌早期复发的时间和风险因素:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Tsung-Jung Tsai, Kai-Jyun Syu, Xuan-Yuan Huang, Yu Shih Liu, Chang-Wei Chen, Yen-Hang Wu, Ching-Min Lin, Yu-Yao Chang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence. Early recurrence (ER) is related to worse prognosis. To date, few observational studies have reported on the analysis of rectal cancer. Hence, we reported on the timing and risk factors for the ER of resectable rectal cancer at our institute.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze a cohort of patients with local and/or distant recurrence following the radical resection of the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database from March 2011 to January 2021. Clinicopathological data at diagnosis, perioperative and postoperative data, and first recurrence were collected and analyzed. ER was defined <i>via</i> receiver operating characteristic curve. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 131 patients. The optimal cut off value of recurrence-free survival (RFS) to differentiate between ER (<i>n</i> = 55, 41.9%) and late recurrence (LR) (<i>n</i> = 76, 58.1%) was 8 mo. The median post-recurrence survival (PRS) of ER and LR was 1.4 mo and 2.9 mo, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.008) but PRS was not strongly associated with RFS (<i>R</i>² = 0.04). Risk factors included age ≥ 70 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.752, <i>P</i> = 0.047], preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (HR = 3.683, <i>P</i> < 0.001), colostomy creation (HR = 2.221, <i>P</i> = 0.036), and length of stay > 9 d (HR = 0.441, <i>P</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFS of 8 mo was the optimal cut-off value. Although ER was not associated with PRS, it was still related to prognosis; thus, intense surveillance is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying timing and risk factors for early recurrence of resectable rectal cancer: A single center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Jung Tsai, Kai-Jyun Syu, Xuan-Yuan Huang, Yu Shih Liu, Chang-Wei Chen, Yen-Hang Wu, Ching-Min Lin, Yu-Yao Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence. Early recurrence (ER) is related to worse prognosis. To date, few observational studies have reported on the analysis of rectal cancer. Hence, we reported on the timing and risk factors for the ER of resectable rectal cancer at our institute.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze a cohort of patients with local and/or distant recurrence following the radical resection of the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database from March 2011 to January 2021. Clinicopathological data at diagnosis, perioperative and postoperative data, and first recurrence were collected and analyzed. ER was defined <i>via</i> receiver operating characteristic curve. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 131 patients. The optimal cut off value of recurrence-free survival (RFS) to differentiate between ER (<i>n</i> = 55, 41.9%) and late recurrence (LR) (<i>n</i> = 76, 58.1%) was 8 mo. The median post-recurrence survival (PRS) of ER and LR was 1.4 mo and 2.9 mo, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.008) but PRS was not strongly associated with RFS (<i>R</i>² = 0.04). Risk factors included age ≥ 70 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.752, <i>P</i> = 0.047], preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (HR = 3.683, <i>P</i> < 0.001), colostomy creation (HR = 2.221, <i>P</i> = 0.036), and length of stay > 9 d (HR = 0.441, <i>P</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFS of 8 mo was the optimal cut-off value. Although ER was not associated with PRS, it was still related to prognosis; thus, intense surveillance is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438806/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,目前已采用多种方法来降低复发的可能性。早期复发(ER)与预后较差有关。迄今为止,很少有观察性研究报告对直肠癌进行分析。因此,我们报告了我院可切除直肠癌的早期复发时间和风险因素。目的:分析原发肿瘤根治性切除术后局部和/或远处复发的患者队列:方法:从医院数据库中回顾性收集2011年3月至2021年1月期间的数据。收集并分析诊断时的临床病理数据、围手术期和术后数据以及首次复发情况。ER通过接收者操作特征曲线进行定义。预后因素采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Cox 比例危险度模型进行评估:结果:我们共纳入了 131 例患者。ER和LR的中位复发后生存期(PRS)分别为1.4个月和2.9个月(P = 0.008),但PRS与RFS的关系不大(R² = 0.04)。风险因素包括年龄≥70岁[危险比(HR)=1.752,P=0.047]、术前同期化放疗(HR=3.683,P<0.001)、结肠造口术(HR=2.221,P=0.036)和住院时间>9 d(HR=0.441,P=0.006):结论:8 个月的 RFS 是最佳临界值。尽管ER与PRS无关,但仍与预后有关;因此,建议加强监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying timing and risk factors for early recurrence of resectable rectal cancer: A single center retrospective study.

Background: Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence. Early recurrence (ER) is related to worse prognosis. To date, few observational studies have reported on the analysis of rectal cancer. Hence, we reported on the timing and risk factors for the ER of resectable rectal cancer at our institute.

Aim: To analyze a cohort of patients with local and/or distant recurrence following the radical resection of the primary tumor.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database from March 2011 to January 2021. Clinicopathological data at diagnosis, perioperative and postoperative data, and first recurrence were collected and analyzed. ER was defined via receiver operating characteristic curve. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: We included 131 patients. The optimal cut off value of recurrence-free survival (RFS) to differentiate between ER (n = 55, 41.9%) and late recurrence (LR) (n = 76, 58.1%) was 8 mo. The median post-recurrence survival (PRS) of ER and LR was 1.4 mo and 2.9 mo, respectively (P = 0.008) but PRS was not strongly associated with RFS (R² = 0.04). Risk factors included age ≥ 70 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.752, P = 0.047], preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (HR = 3.683, P < 0.001), colostomy creation (HR = 2.221, P = 0.036), and length of stay > 9 d (HR = 0.441, P = 0.006).

Conclusion: RFS of 8 mo was the optimal cut-off value. Although ER was not associated with PRS, it was still related to prognosis; thus, intense surveillance is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信