{"title":"泰国慢性中风患者中四种肌肉疏松症筛查方法的准确性：一项横断面研究。","authors":"Kannanat Laosuwan, Ratana Vichiansiri, Charoonsak Somboonporn, Jittima Saengsuwan","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2409000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of screening tools for sarcopenia and to determine whether the same or different cutoff points should be applied in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight participants with residual hemiparetic deficit for over 6 months were enrolled. We evaluated the accuracy of calf circumference, SARC-F questionnaire, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart using the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 revised criteria as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia was identified in 22 participants (32.4%) based on the AWGS criteria. Overall, SARC-F showed the lowest diagnostic accuracy. The Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves (AUC) of calf circumference, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.88), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.87), and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.90), respectively. The mean AUC of SARC-F was inferior to SARC-CalF (0.58 vs. 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy and diagnostic properties of calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were comparable (mean AUC of 0.77, 0.75, and 0.78, respectively). SARC-F showed the lowest accuracy (mean AUC = 0.58). The recommended screening tools are calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart. It is not recommended to rely solely on SARC-F for screening sarcopenia after stroke. We proposed potential new cutoff points for each screening instrument, including SARC-F, SARC-CalF, calf circumference in women, and Ishii's score chart for both men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of four sarcopenia screening methods in patients with chronic stroke in Thailand: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Kannanat Laosuwan, Ratana Vichiansiri, Charoonsak Somboonporn, Jittima Saengsuwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2409000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of screening tools for sarcopenia and to determine whether the same or different cutoff points should be applied in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight participants with residual hemiparetic deficit for over 6 months were enrolled. We evaluated the accuracy of calf circumference, SARC-F questionnaire, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart using the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 revised criteria as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sarcopenia was identified in 22 participants (32.4%) based on the AWGS criteria. Overall, SARC-F showed the lowest diagnostic accuracy. The Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves (AUC) of calf circumference, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.88), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.87), and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.90), respectively. The mean AUC of SARC-F was inferior to SARC-CalF (0.58 vs. 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy and diagnostic properties of calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were comparable (mean AUC of 0.77, 0.75, and 0.78, respectively). SARC-F showed the lowest accuracy (mean AUC = 0.58). The recommended screening tools are calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart. It is not recommended to rely solely on SARC-F for screening sarcopenia after stroke. We proposed potential new cutoff points for each screening instrument, including SARC-F, SARC-CalF, calf circumference in women, and Ishii's score chart for both men and women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2409000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2409000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of four sarcopenia screening methods in patients with chronic stroke in Thailand: a cross-sectional study.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of screening tools for sarcopenia and to determine whether the same or different cutoff points should be applied in patients with chronic stroke.
Materials and methods: Sixty-eight participants with residual hemiparetic deficit for over 6 months were enrolled. We evaluated the accuracy of calf circumference, SARC-F questionnaire, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart using the Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 revised criteria as the gold standard.
Results: Sarcopenia was identified in 22 participants (32.4%) based on the AWGS criteria. Overall, SARC-F showed the lowest diagnostic accuracy. The Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves (AUC) of calf circumference, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.88), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.62-0.87), and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.90), respectively. The mean AUC of SARC-F was inferior to SARC-CalF (0.58 vs. 0.75, p = 0.035).
Conclusions: The accuracy and diagnostic properties of calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart were comparable (mean AUC of 0.77, 0.75, and 0.78, respectively). SARC-F showed the lowest accuracy (mean AUC = 0.58). The recommended screening tools are calf circumference, SARC-CalF, and Ishii's score chart. It is not recommended to rely solely on SARC-F for screening sarcopenia after stroke. We proposed potential new cutoff points for each screening instrument, including SARC-F, SARC-CalF, calf circumference in women, and Ishii's score chart for both men and women.
期刊介绍：
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
