Eric Franssen, Clemens Weber, Tor Åge Myklebust, Ivar Magne Austevoll, Helena Brisby, Christian Hellum, Kjersti Storheim, Jørn Aaen, Hasan Banitalebi, Jens Ivar Brox, Kari Indrekvam, Erland Hermansen
{"title":"有症状腰椎管狭窄症患者多余神经根的临床重要性:对 NORDSTEN 椎管狭窄症试验数据的二次分析。","authors":"Eric Franssen, Clemens Weber, Tor Åge Myklebust, Ivar Magne Austevoll, Helena Brisby, Christian Hellum, Kjersti Storheim, Jørn Aaen, Hasan Banitalebi, Jens Ivar Brox, Kari Indrekvam, Erland Hermansen","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare preoperative symptoms of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with and without redundant nerve roots (RNRs), and to compare the change in clinical outcomes between those two groups 2 years after decompression surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>RNRs are often seen on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal stenosis. Previous studies have reported that patients with RNR are older and have worse symptoms at baseline. A meta-analysis from 2018 concluded that this radiologic sign could be seen as a negative predictor of outcome. High-quality prospective studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and reported pain and function scores were compared between lumbar spinal stenosis groups with (RNR+) and without RNR (RNR-) at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was the mean change in the Oswestry Disability Score (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included mean change in scores of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale for leg and back pains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 416 patients included in the present analysis, 163 (39%) had RNR at baseline. Both groups were similar in regard to patient age, smoking habits, Body Mass Index, and duration of symptoms. Both groups also showed similar pain and function scores at baseline. The RNR+ group contained a significantly higher proportion of men, patients with severe stenosis and multiple stenotic levels on magnetic resonance imaging. At a 2-year follow-up, the mean change of the Oswestry Disability Index was -22.1 in the RNR+ group and -17.4 in the RNR- group [mean difference: 4.7 (95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2); P = 0.007]. Statistically significant differences were also found for secondary outcomes Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, and Numerical Rating Scale leg and back pains favoring the RNR+ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RNR had similar baseline characteristics and similar symptoms as patients without. RNR before surgery was associated with better clinical improvement 2 years after decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"941-947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Importance of Redundant Nerve Roots in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis of NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial Data.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Franssen, Clemens Weber, Tor Åge Myklebust, Ivar Magne Austevoll, Helena Brisby, Christian Hellum, Kjersti Storheim, Jørn Aaen, Hasan Banitalebi, Jens Ivar Brox, Kari Indrekvam, Erland Hermansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare preoperative symptoms of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with and without redundant nerve roots (RNRs), and to compare the change in clinical outcomes between those two groups 2 years after decompression surgery.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>RNRs are often seen on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal stenosis. Previous studies have reported that patients with RNR are older and have worse symptoms at baseline. A meta-analysis from 2018 concluded that this radiologic sign could be seen as a negative predictor of outcome. High-quality prospective studies are lacking.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and reported pain and function scores were compared between lumbar spinal stenosis groups with (RNR+) and without RNR (RNR-) at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was the mean change in the Oswestry Disability Score (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included mean change in scores of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale for leg and back pains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 416 patients included in the present analysis, 163 (39%) had RNR at baseline. Both groups were similar in regard to patient age, smoking habits, Body Mass Index, and duration of symptoms. Both groups also showed similar pain and function scores at baseline. The RNR+ group contained a significantly higher proportion of men, patients with severe stenosis and multiple stenotic levels on magnetic resonance imaging. At a 2-year follow-up, the mean change of the Oswestry Disability Index was -22.1 in the RNR+ group and -17.4 in the RNR- group [mean difference: 4.7 (95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2); P = 0.007]. Statistically significant differences were also found for secondary outcomes Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, and Numerical Rating Scale leg and back pains favoring the RNR+ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RNR had similar baseline characteristics and similar symptoms as patients without. RNR before surgery was associated with better clinical improvement 2 years after decompression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"941-947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Importance of Redundant Nerve Roots in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis of NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial Data.
Study design: Post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial.
Objective: To compare preoperative symptoms of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with and without redundant nerve roots (RNRs), and to compare the change in clinical outcomes between those two groups 2 years after decompression surgery.
Background: RNRs are often seen on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal stenosis. Previous studies have reported that patients with RNR are older and have worse symptoms at baseline. A meta-analysis from 2018 concluded that this radiologic sign could be seen as a negative predictor of outcome. High-quality prospective studies are lacking.
Patients and methods: Patient characteristics and reported pain and function scores were compared between lumbar spinal stenosis groups with (RNR+) and without RNR (RNR-) at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was the mean change in the Oswestry Disability Score (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included mean change in scores of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale for leg and back pains.
Results: Out of 416 patients included in the present analysis, 163 (39%) had RNR at baseline. Both groups were similar in regard to patient age, smoking habits, Body Mass Index, and duration of symptoms. Both groups also showed similar pain and function scores at baseline. The RNR+ group contained a significantly higher proportion of men, patients with severe stenosis and multiple stenotic levels on magnetic resonance imaging. At a 2-year follow-up, the mean change of the Oswestry Disability Index was -22.1 in the RNR+ group and -17.4 in the RNR- group [mean difference: 4.7 (95% CI: 1.3 to 8.2); P = 0.007]. Statistically significant differences were also found for secondary outcomes Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, and Numerical Rating Scale leg and back pains favoring the RNR+ group.
Conclusion: Patients with RNR had similar baseline characteristics and similar symptoms as patients without. RNR before surgery was associated with better clinical improvement 2 years after decompression.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.