{"title":"测试选定分组的治疗效果。","authors":"Nigel Stallard","doi":"10.1177/09622802241277764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing interest in clinical trials that investigate how patients may respond differently to an experimental treatment depending on the basis of some biomarker measured on a continuous scale, and in particular to identify some threshold value for the biomarker above which a positive treatment effect can be considered to have been demonstrated. This can be statistically challenging when the same data are used both to select the threshold and to test the treatment effect in the subpopulation that it defines. This paper describes a hierarchical testing framework to give familywise type I error rate control in this setting and proposes two specific tests that can be used within this framework. One, a simple test based on the estimated value from a linear regression model with treatment by biomarker interaction, is powerful but can lead to type I error rate inflation if the assumptions of the linear model are not met. The other is more robust to these assumptions, but can be slightly less powerful when the assumptions hold.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1967-1978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing for a treatment effect in a selected subgroup.\",\"authors\":\"Nigel Stallard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09622802241277764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a growing interest in clinical trials that investigate how patients may respond differently to an experimental treatment depending on the basis of some biomarker measured on a continuous scale, and in particular to identify some threshold value for the biomarker above which a positive treatment effect can be considered to have been demonstrated. This can be statistically challenging when the same data are used both to select the threshold and to test the treatment effect in the subpopulation that it defines. This paper describes a hierarchical testing framework to give familywise type I error rate control in this setting and proposes two specific tests that can be used within this framework. One, a simple test based on the estimated value from a linear regression model with treatment by biomarker interaction, is powerful but can lead to type I error rate inflation if the assumptions of the linear model are not met. The other is more robust to these assumptions, but can be slightly less powerful when the assumptions hold.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1967-1978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241277764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241277764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们对临床试验的兴趣与日俱增,这些试验研究病人对试验性治疗的反应如何因连续测量的生物标志物的不同而不同,特别是要确定生物标志物的某个阈值,超过这个阈值就可以认为治疗效果得到了证实。如果使用相同的数据来选择阈值,并在阈值所定义的亚人群中测试治疗效果,这在统计学上可能具有挑战性。本文描述了一个分层检验框架,以便在这种情况下控制族类 I 型误差率,并提出了两个可在此框架内使用的具体检验方法。一种是基于线性回归模型估计值的简单检验,具有治疗与生物标志物交互作用的特点,但如果不符合线性模型的假设,则可能导致 I 型错误率膨胀。另一种方法对这些假设更为稳健,但当假设成立时,其有效性会稍差一些。
Testing for a treatment effect in a selected subgroup.
There is a growing interest in clinical trials that investigate how patients may respond differently to an experimental treatment depending on the basis of some biomarker measured on a continuous scale, and in particular to identify some threshold value for the biomarker above which a positive treatment effect can be considered to have been demonstrated. This can be statistically challenging when the same data are used both to select the threshold and to test the treatment effect in the subpopulation that it defines. This paper describes a hierarchical testing framework to give familywise type I error rate control in this setting and proposes two specific tests that can be used within this framework. One, a simple test based on the estimated value from a linear regression model with treatment by biomarker interaction, is powerful but can lead to type I error rate inflation if the assumptions of the linear model are not met. The other is more robust to these assumptions, but can be slightly less powerful when the assumptions hold.
期刊介绍:
Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)