美国城市和农村医院中农村产妇的产科结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.22605/RRH8836
Courtney L Strickland, Dmitry Tumin, Alyssa Harris, Hannah Murphy, James L Whiteside
{"title":"美国城市和农村医院中农村产妇的产科结果。","authors":"Courtney L Strickland, Dmitry Tumin, Alyssa Harris, Hannah Murphy, James L Whiteside","doi":"10.22605/RRH8836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate severe maternal morbidity (SMM) of rural parturients delivering at rural compared to urban hospitals in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients aged 18-40 years in a multi-institutional claims database who lived in a rural ZIP code and delivered at a rural or urban hospital between October-December of 2015 and October-December of 2022. The primary outcome was SMM, and the secondary outcome was SMM exclusive of blood transfusions. We combined exact ZIP code matching and propensity score matching to compare SMM risk among patients living in the same rural community and delivering in urban as compared to rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 214 296 patients from 571 ZIP codes were identified, including 47% delivering at rural facilities and 53% delivering at urban facilities. The SMM rate was 1.1% (0.3% excluding blood transfusions). After matching, urban versus rural delivery was associated with increased odds of SMM other than blood transfusion (odds ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.81-3.28), but was not associated with differences in risk of any SMM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of reduced SMM for rural patients delivering at an urban rather than a rural hospital. SMM exclusive of blood transfusions was increased for rural patients delivering at urban hospitals after matching on ZIP code and predictors of urban hospital delivery. Our findings undermine the assumption that delivery at a rural facility has inherently greater risks relative to delivery at an urban facility. As some health systems face challenges to maintain rural labor and delivery units, patient safety must be considered if confronted with the possibility of unit or hospital closures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 3","pages":"8836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric outcomes among rural parturients across US urban and rural hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney L Strickland, Dmitry Tumin, Alyssa Harris, Hannah Murphy, James L Whiteside\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH8836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate severe maternal morbidity (SMM) of rural parturients delivering at rural compared to urban hospitals in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients aged 18-40 years in a multi-institutional claims database who lived in a rural ZIP code and delivered at a rural or urban hospital between October-December of 2015 and October-December of 2022. The primary outcome was SMM, and the secondary outcome was SMM exclusive of blood transfusions. We combined exact ZIP code matching and propensity score matching to compare SMM risk among patients living in the same rural community and delivering in urban as compared to rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 214 296 patients from 571 ZIP codes were identified, including 47% delivering at rural facilities and 53% delivering at urban facilities. The SMM rate was 1.1% (0.3% excluding blood transfusions). After matching, urban versus rural delivery was associated with increased odds of SMM other than blood transfusion (odds ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.81-3.28), but was not associated with differences in risk of any SMM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no evidence of reduced SMM for rural patients delivering at an urban rather than a rural hospital. SMM exclusive of blood transfusions was increased for rural patients delivering at urban hospitals after matching on ZIP code and predictors of urban hospital delivery. Our findings undermine the assumption that delivery at a rural facility has inherently greater risks relative to delivery at an urban facility. As some health systems face challenges to maintain rural labor and delivery units, patient safety must be considered if confronted with the possibility of unit or hospital closures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"8836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8836\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究旨在评估美国农村产妇与城市产妇在农村医院分娩时的严重孕产妇发病率(SMM):我们在多机构索赔数据库中识别了年龄在 18-40 岁、居住在农村邮政编码内、2015 年 10-12 月至 2022 年 10-12 月期间在农村或城市医院分娩的患者。主要结果为 SMM,次要结果为不包括输血的 SMM。我们结合精确的邮政编码匹配和倾向得分匹配,比较了居住在同一农村社区、在城市医院分娩的患者与在农村医院分娩的患者之间的SMM风险:共有来自 571 个邮政编码的 214 296 名患者被确认,其中 47% 在农村医疗机构分娩,53% 在城市医疗机构分娩。SMM率为1.1%(不包括输血为0.3%)。经过比对,城市与农村分娩与输血以外的SMM几率增加有关(几率比2.44;95%置信区间1.81-3.28),但与任何SMM的风险差异无关:结论:没有证据表明在城市医院而非农村医院分娩的农村患者的SMM会降低。根据邮政编码和城市医院分娩的预测因素进行匹配后,在城市医院分娩的农村患者不输血的 SMM 增加了。我们的研究结果削弱了在农村医疗机构分娩比在城市医疗机构分娩风险更大的假设。由于一些医疗系统在维持农村产科方面面临挑战,因此在面临关闭产科或医院的可能性时,必须考虑患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetric outcomes among rural parturients across US urban and rural hospitals.

Introduction: The objective of this study is to evaluate severe maternal morbidity (SMM) of rural parturients delivering at rural compared to urban hospitals in the US.

Methods: We identified patients aged 18-40 years in a multi-institutional claims database who lived in a rural ZIP code and delivered at a rural or urban hospital between October-December of 2015 and October-December of 2022. The primary outcome was SMM, and the secondary outcome was SMM exclusive of blood transfusions. We combined exact ZIP code matching and propensity score matching to compare SMM risk among patients living in the same rural community and delivering in urban as compared to rural hospitals.

Results: A total of 214 296 patients from 571 ZIP codes were identified, including 47% delivering at rural facilities and 53% delivering at urban facilities. The SMM rate was 1.1% (0.3% excluding blood transfusions). After matching, urban versus rural delivery was associated with increased odds of SMM other than blood transfusion (odds ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.81-3.28), but was not associated with differences in risk of any SMM.

Conclusion: There was no evidence of reduced SMM for rural patients delivering at an urban rather than a rural hospital. SMM exclusive of blood transfusions was increased for rural patients delivering at urban hospitals after matching on ZIP code and predictors of urban hospital delivery. Our findings undermine the assumption that delivery at a rural facility has inherently greater risks relative to delivery at an urban facility. As some health systems face challenges to maintain rural labor and delivery units, patient safety must be considered if confronted with the possibility of unit or hospital closures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信