[热性惊厥的院前和住院治疗]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
I Trittler-Ugidos, F Paredes-Carmona, G Vidiella-Rico, N Visa-Reñé
{"title":"[热性惊厥的院前和住院治疗]。","authors":"I Trittler-Ugidos, F Paredes-Carmona, G Vidiella-Rico, N Visa-Reñé","doi":"10.33588/rn.7907.2024243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given that febrile seizures are a common reason for both hospital and pre-hospital visits to physicians, and in the absence of a clear consensus on guidelines for treatment, especially for complex febrile seizures (CFS), we aim to examine their characteristics and treatment in order to improve the approach to the issue.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is an observational, retrospective, single-centre study including paediatric patients seen after a seizure associated with a febrile illness in the emergency department of a second-level hospital between September 2021 and December 2023. Epidemiological, clinical and treatment variables were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 266 febrile seizures were included in the study: 188 (70.7%) were simple, and 78 (29.3%) were complex. Most benzodiazepines were administered during pre-hospital treatment (82%), and the transmucosal route was used in 70.3% of cases, despite the patient being in a healthcare environment. Complementary tests were performed in 70.6% of cases, blood tests in 65.6%, and nasopharyngeal swabs for viruses in 79.3%. A total of 73.6% of the tests requested were for patients with a focus of the fever.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extensive use of complementary tests persists, despite the identification of a focus of the fever in most patients. Our results show that systematic complementary tests and the admission of patients who have presented a CFS would not be justified, and each individual case should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pre-hospital and hospital treatment of febrile seizures].\",\"authors\":\"I Trittler-Ugidos, F Paredes-Carmona, G Vidiella-Rico, N Visa-Reñé\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7907.2024243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given that febrile seizures are a common reason for both hospital and pre-hospital visits to physicians, and in the absence of a clear consensus on guidelines for treatment, especially for complex febrile seizures (CFS), we aim to examine their characteristics and treatment in order to improve the approach to the issue.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is an observational, retrospective, single-centre study including paediatric patients seen after a seizure associated with a febrile illness in the emergency department of a second-level hospital between September 2021 and December 2023. Epidemiological, clinical and treatment variables were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 266 febrile seizures were included in the study: 188 (70.7%) were simple, and 78 (29.3%) were complex. Most benzodiazepines were administered during pre-hospital treatment (82%), and the transmucosal route was used in 70.3% of cases, despite the patient being in a healthcare environment. Complementary tests were performed in 70.6% of cases, blood tests in 65.6%, and nasopharyngeal swabs for viruses in 79.3%. A total of 73.6% of the tests requested were for patients with a focus of the fever.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extensive use of complementary tests persists, despite the identification of a focus of the fever in most patients. Our results show that systematic complementary tests and the admission of patients who have presented a CFS would not be justified, and each individual case should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7907.2024243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7907.2024243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:鉴于发热性癫痫发作是医院和院前就诊的常见原因,并且在治疗指南方面缺乏明确共识,尤其是复杂性发热性癫痫发作(CFS),我们旨在研究其特点和治疗方法,以改进解决这一问题的方法:这是一项观察性、回顾性、单中心研究,包括 2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 12 月期间在一家二级医院急诊科就诊的发热性疾病相关癫痫发作后的儿科患者。研究收集了流行病学、临床和治疗变量:研究共纳入了 266 例发热性癫痫发作:188例(70.7%)为单纯性发作,78例(29.3%)为复杂性发作。大多数苯二氮卓类药物是在院前治疗期间使用的(82%),70.3%的病例使用的是经黏膜途径,尽管患者是在医疗环境中。对 70.6% 的病例进行了辅助检查,对 65.6% 的病例进行了血液检查,对 79.3% 的病例进行了鼻咽拭子病毒检测。73.6%的化验要求是针对发烧病人的:结论:尽管大多数患者的发热灶已被确定,但辅助检查的广泛使用依然存在。我们的研究结果表明,对出现 CFS 的病人进行系统的辅助检查和收治是不合理的,应该考虑到每个人的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Pre-hospital and hospital treatment of febrile seizures].

Introduction: Given that febrile seizures are a common reason for both hospital and pre-hospital visits to physicians, and in the absence of a clear consensus on guidelines for treatment, especially for complex febrile seizures (CFS), we aim to examine their characteristics and treatment in order to improve the approach to the issue.

Patients and methods: This is an observational, retrospective, single-centre study including paediatric patients seen after a seizure associated with a febrile illness in the emergency department of a second-level hospital between September 2021 and December 2023. Epidemiological, clinical and treatment variables were collected.

Results: A total of 266 febrile seizures were included in the study: 188 (70.7%) were simple, and 78 (29.3%) were complex. Most benzodiazepines were administered during pre-hospital treatment (82%), and the transmucosal route was used in 70.3% of cases, despite the patient being in a healthcare environment. Complementary tests were performed in 70.6% of cases, blood tests in 65.6%, and nasopharyngeal swabs for viruses in 79.3%. A total of 73.6% of the tests requested were for patients with a focus of the fever.

Conclusions: Extensive use of complementary tests persists, despite the identification of a focus of the fever in most patients. Our results show that systematic complementary tests and the admission of patients who have presented a CFS would not be justified, and each individual case should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信