改善堕胎护理的机会:主要利益相关者对满足寻求堕胎的变性人、非二元人和性别扩张者需求的最佳做法的分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aliza J Barnett, Subasri Narasimhan, Sophie A Hartwig, Anna Newton-Levinson
{"title":"改善堕胎护理的机会:主要利益相关者对满足寻求堕胎的变性人、非二元人和性别扩张者需求的最佳做法的分析。","authors":"Aliza J Barnett, Subasri Narasimhan, Sophie A Hartwig, Anna Newton-Levinson","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TGE) persons experience pregnancies and have abortions, yet abortion care remains rooted in a gender binary, often centering the needs, experiences, and challenges of cisgender women. Despite guidance supporting gender-affirming sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH), barriers for TGE people seeking abortions persist. We conducted an exploratory case study with key informants to understand their perception of TGE abortion seekers' needs with specific considerations for those in restrictive abortion settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews focused on gender-affirming care and abortion provision were conducted with U.S.-based key informant clinicians (n = 4) who could provide powerful insights into gaps and experiences faced by TGE individuals. Participants were eligible if they currently or previously provided abortions and had experience practicing gender-affirming care. Interviews focused on informants' perceptions of TGE patients' needs when seeking abortions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight the unique barriers TGE patients face when seeking abortions, including lack of provider knowledge, in-clinic stigmatization, and gender marginalization. It is notable that key informants who practiced in abortion-protective political environments have greater access to resources to implement gender-affirming care than those in restrictive contexts. Results are summarized in a clinical recommendations document which provides an accessible starting point for clinicians to begin building gender-inclusive abortion spaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is necessary to further understand barriers facing TGE abortion seekers and integrate recommendations and emerging evidence into abortion practice. This study contributes to a growing knowledge base which emphasizes the need for inclusive abortion spaces and highlights key considerations for improving access and quality for TGE abortions seekers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities for improving abortion care: a key stakeholder analysis of best practices for addressing the needs of transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive people seeking abortions.\",\"authors\":\"Aliza J Barnett, Subasri Narasimhan, Sophie A Hartwig, Anna Newton-Levinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TGE) persons experience pregnancies and have abortions, yet abortion care remains rooted in a gender binary, often centering the needs, experiences, and challenges of cisgender women. Despite guidance supporting gender-affirming sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH), barriers for TGE people seeking abortions persist. We conducted an exploratory case study with key informants to understand their perception of TGE abortion seekers' needs with specific considerations for those in restrictive abortion settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews focused on gender-affirming care and abortion provision were conducted with U.S.-based key informant clinicians (n = 4) who could provide powerful insights into gaps and experiences faced by TGE individuals. Participants were eligible if they currently or previously provided abortions and had experience practicing gender-affirming care. Interviews focused on informants' perceptions of TGE patients' needs when seeking abortions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlight the unique barriers TGE patients face when seeking abortions, including lack of provider knowledge, in-clinic stigmatization, and gender marginalization. It is notable that key informants who practiced in abortion-protective political environments have greater access to resources to implement gender-affirming care than those in restrictive contexts. Results are summarized in a clinical recommendations document which provides an accessible starting point for clinicians to begin building gender-inclusive abortion spaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is necessary to further understand barriers facing TGE abortion seekers and integrate recommendations and emerging evidence into abortion practice. This study contributes to a growing knowledge base which emphasizes the need for inclusive abortion spaces and highlights key considerations for improving access and quality for TGE abortions seekers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01863-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:跨性别、非二元和性别扩展(TGE)人士会怀孕并堕胎,但堕胎护理仍根植于性别二元论,通常以顺性性别女性的需求、经历和挑战为中心。尽管性健康和生殖健康(SRH)指南支持性别平等,但对于寻求堕胎的女性同性恋者来说,障碍依然存在。我们对主要信息提供者进行了一项探索性案例研究,以了解他们对寻求人工流产的 TGE 需求的看法,并特别考虑到那些处于限制性人工流产环境中的人:方法:我们对美国的关键信息提供者临床医生(n = 4)进行了定性访谈,重点关注性别肯定护理和人工流产服务,他们可以为 TGE 个人所面临的差距和经历提供有力的见解。如果参与者目前或曾经提供过人工流产服务,并具有性别平等关怀的实践经验,则有资格参加访谈。访谈的重点是信息提供者对 TGE 患者寻求堕胎时的需求的看法:结果:研究结果强调了 TGE 患者在寻求堕胎时所面临的独特障碍,包括缺乏对提供者的了解、诊所内的污名化以及性别边缘化。值得注意的是,在保护堕胎的政治环境中从业的关键信息提供者比在限制性环境中从业的关键信息提供者有更多的资源来实施性别平等护理。临床建议文件对结果进行了总结,为临床医生开始建立性别包容的人工流产空间提供了一个易于理解的起点:有必要进一步了解寻求人工流产的女性同性恋者面临的障碍,并将建议和新出现的证据纳入人工流产实践中。这项研究为不断扩大的知识库做出了贡献,强调了包容性人工流产空间的必要性,并着重指出了提高寻求人工流产者的机会和质量的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunities for improving abortion care: a key stakeholder analysis of best practices for addressing the needs of transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive people seeking abortions.

Objectives: Transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TGE) persons experience pregnancies and have abortions, yet abortion care remains rooted in a gender binary, often centering the needs, experiences, and challenges of cisgender women. Despite guidance supporting gender-affirming sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH), barriers for TGE people seeking abortions persist. We conducted an exploratory case study with key informants to understand their perception of TGE abortion seekers' needs with specific considerations for those in restrictive abortion settings.

Methods: Qualitative interviews focused on gender-affirming care and abortion provision were conducted with U.S.-based key informant clinicians (n = 4) who could provide powerful insights into gaps and experiences faced by TGE individuals. Participants were eligible if they currently or previously provided abortions and had experience practicing gender-affirming care. Interviews focused on informants' perceptions of TGE patients' needs when seeking abortions.

Results: Findings highlight the unique barriers TGE patients face when seeking abortions, including lack of provider knowledge, in-clinic stigmatization, and gender marginalization. It is notable that key informants who practiced in abortion-protective political environments have greater access to resources to implement gender-affirming care than those in restrictive contexts. Results are summarized in a clinical recommendations document which provides an accessible starting point for clinicians to begin building gender-inclusive abortion spaces.

Conclusions: It is necessary to further understand barriers facing TGE abortion seekers and integrate recommendations and emerging evidence into abortion practice. This study contributes to a growing knowledge base which emphasizes the need for inclusive abortion spaces and highlights key considerations for improving access and quality for TGE abortions seekers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信