基于手机的中国慢性病患者戒烟干预:连续多次分配随机试验 (SMART)。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xue Weng, Chuyu Song, Kefeng Liu, Shengzhi Zhao, Hongcui Yang, Man Ping Wang
{"title":"基于手机的中国慢性病患者戒烟干预:连续多次分配随机试验 (SMART)。","authors":"Xue Weng, Chuyu Song, Kefeng Liu, Shengzhi Zhao, Hongcui Yang, Man Ping Wang","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile phone-based interventions show promise for smoking cessation but often face low engagement. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a 2-phase, multi-component mobile phone-based smoking cessation intervention for patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) recruited smokers with chronic diseases from hospitals in Zhuhai, China. Participants received brief cessation advice and were randomized to personalized chat support (PCS, n=64) or group chat support (GCS, n=64) for 1 month. At 1-month, PCS non-responders (continuing smokers) were re-randomized to receive either multi-component optional support (MOS) or continued PCS for 2 months. GCS non-responders were re-randomized to receive PCS or continued GCS. Responders continued with their initial intervention for 2 months. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, participation, retention, intervention engagement, and satisfaction. Preliminary effectiveness was assessed by abstinence rates among non-responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 screened, 128 (all male, 46.1% aged≤39 years) participated. At 1-month, 51 and 53 non-responded to PCS and GCS, respectively. Of them, 26 were re-randomized to receive PCS-MOS and 26 to receive GCS-PCS. At 6-month, PCS-MOS showed a non-significant higher validated abstinence rate compared to PCS alone (11.5% vs. 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95%CI 0.30-32.31, P=0.34), GCS-PCS showed a non-significant lower validated abstinence rate compared to GCS (0% vs. 11.1%, OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.15-1.67, P=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial showed the feasibility of leveraging hospital visits as teachable opportunities and integrating mobile phone-based smoking cessation support into chronic disease management in China. Optional treatments alongside mobile support showed preliminary effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile phone-based smoking-cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in China: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART).\",\"authors\":\"Xue Weng, Chuyu Song, Kefeng Liu, Shengzhi Zhao, Hongcui Yang, Man Ping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile phone-based interventions show promise for smoking cessation but often face low engagement. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a 2-phase, multi-component mobile phone-based smoking cessation intervention for patients with chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) recruited smokers with chronic diseases from hospitals in Zhuhai, China. Participants received brief cessation advice and were randomized to personalized chat support (PCS, n=64) or group chat support (GCS, n=64) for 1 month. At 1-month, PCS non-responders (continuing smokers) were re-randomized to receive either multi-component optional support (MOS) or continued PCS for 2 months. GCS non-responders were re-randomized to receive PCS or continued GCS. Responders continued with their initial intervention for 2 months. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, participation, retention, intervention engagement, and satisfaction. Preliminary effectiveness was assessed by abstinence rates among non-responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 screened, 128 (all male, 46.1% aged≤39 years) participated. At 1-month, 51 and 53 non-responded to PCS and GCS, respectively. Of them, 26 were re-randomized to receive PCS-MOS and 26 to receive GCS-PCS. At 6-month, PCS-MOS showed a non-significant higher validated abstinence rate compared to PCS alone (11.5% vs. 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95%CI 0.30-32.31, P=0.34), GCS-PCS showed a non-significant lower validated abstinence rate compared to GCS (0% vs. 11.1%, OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.15-1.67, P=0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial showed the feasibility of leveraging hospital visits as teachable opportunities and integrating mobile phone-based smoking cessation support into chronic disease management in China. Optional treatments alongside mobile support showed preliminary effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介基于手机的戒烟干预显示出良好的前景,但往往面临参与度低的问题。本研究评估了针对慢性病患者的两阶段、多成分手机戒烟干预的可行性和初步有效性:这项顺序多重分配随机试验(SMART)从中国珠海的医院招募了慢性病吸烟者。参与者接受简短的戒烟建议,并随机接受为期1个月的个性化聊天支持(PCS,64人)或群组聊天支持(GCS,64人)。1个月后,PCS未应答者(继续吸烟者)被重新随机分配到多成分可选支持(MOS)或继续PCS 2个月。GCS未应答者被重新随机分配接受PCS或继续接受GCS。应答者继续接受最初的干预,为期 2 个月。可行性结果包括资格、参与度、保留率、干预参与度和满意度。初步效果通过非应答者的戒断率进行评估:在筛选出的 160 人中,128 人(均为男性,46.1% 年龄小于 39 岁)参加了干预。1 个月后,分别有 51 人和 53 人未对 PCS 和 GCS 作出反应。其中,26 人被重新随机分配接受 PCS-MOS 治疗,26 人接受 GCS-PCS 治疗。6个月后,PCS-MOS与单独接受PCS相比,有效戒断率显著提高(11.5% vs. 4.2%,几率比[OR] 3.13,95%CI 0.30-32.31,P=0.34);GCS-PCS与GCS相比,有效戒断率显著降低(0% vs. 11.1%,OR 0.50,95%CI 0.15-1.67,P=0.26):该试验表明,在中国将医院就诊作为教学机会,并将基于手机的戒烟支持纳入慢性病管理是可行的。与手机支持同时进行的可选治疗显示出初步的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile phone-based smoking-cessation intervention in patients with chronic diseases in China: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART).

Introduction: Mobile phone-based interventions show promise for smoking cessation but often face low engagement. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a 2-phase, multi-component mobile phone-based smoking cessation intervention for patients with chronic diseases.

Methods: This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) recruited smokers with chronic diseases from hospitals in Zhuhai, China. Participants received brief cessation advice and were randomized to personalized chat support (PCS, n=64) or group chat support (GCS, n=64) for 1 month. At 1-month, PCS non-responders (continuing smokers) were re-randomized to receive either multi-component optional support (MOS) or continued PCS for 2 months. GCS non-responders were re-randomized to receive PCS or continued GCS. Responders continued with their initial intervention for 2 months. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, participation, retention, intervention engagement, and satisfaction. Preliminary effectiveness was assessed by abstinence rates among non-responders.

Results: Of 160 screened, 128 (all male, 46.1% aged≤39 years) participated. At 1-month, 51 and 53 non-responded to PCS and GCS, respectively. Of them, 26 were re-randomized to receive PCS-MOS and 26 to receive GCS-PCS. At 6-month, PCS-MOS showed a non-significant higher validated abstinence rate compared to PCS alone (11.5% vs. 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95%CI 0.30-32.31, P=0.34), GCS-PCS showed a non-significant lower validated abstinence rate compared to GCS (0% vs. 11.1%, OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.15-1.67, P=0.26).

Conclusions: This trial showed the feasibility of leveraging hospital visits as teachable opportunities and integrating mobile phone-based smoking cessation support into chronic disease management in China. Optional treatments alongside mobile support showed preliminary effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信