介入放射科手术室噪音管理对经动脉化疗栓塞术患者的影响:回顾性研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Noise & Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.4103/nah.nah_53_24
Yong Lu, Lingyu Ma, Zhuo Chen, Hui Qi, Zhaotian Gu, Lei Wu, Benfang Fan
{"title":"介入放射科手术室噪音管理对经动脉化疗栓塞术患者的影响:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yong Lu, Lingyu Ma, Zhuo Chen, Hui Qi, Zhaotian Gu, Lei Wu, Benfang Fan","doi":"10.4103/nah.nah_53_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effect of noise management in interventional radiology suites on patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included a total of 141 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE surgery in interventional radiology suite of the First People's Hospital of Nantong from January 2022 to December 2022. The patients were divided into an observation group (received noise management, n = 70) and a control group (did not receive noise management, n = 71) on the basis of whether they received noise management. Patient demographics and surgical data were collected, and heart rate, blood pressure, and anxiety levels were assessed before, during and after surgery. Satisfaction and the incidence of adverse reactions were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in general characteristics. The comparison between the observation and control groups revealed statistically significant differences in noise levels (P < 0.001). Additionally, anxiety levels significantly differed between the two groups (P = 0.040) as well as across different time points (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in the occurrence of adverse events between groups (P = 0.772). Furthermore, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group (P < 0.001). Although no significant differences were found in heart rate and systolic blood pressure between groups (P > 0.05), and a significant main effect of time was observed for both variables (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noise management in the interventional radiology suite effectively alleviates intraoperative anxiety among patients with TACE and improves treatment satisfaction but has no significant effect on physiological changes and the incidence of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19195,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Health","volume":"26 122","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Noise Management in Interventional Radiology Suites on Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Lu, Lingyu Ma, Zhuo Chen, Hui Qi, Zhaotian Gu, Lei Wu, Benfang Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nah.nah_53_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effect of noise management in interventional radiology suites on patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included a total of 141 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE surgery in interventional radiology suite of the First People's Hospital of Nantong from January 2022 to December 2022. The patients were divided into an observation group (received noise management, n = 70) and a control group (did not receive noise management, n = 71) on the basis of whether they received noise management. Patient demographics and surgical data were collected, and heart rate, blood pressure, and anxiety levels were assessed before, during and after surgery. Satisfaction and the incidence of adverse reactions were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in general characteristics. The comparison between the observation and control groups revealed statistically significant differences in noise levels (P < 0.001). Additionally, anxiety levels significantly differed between the two groups (P = 0.040) as well as across different time points (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in the occurrence of adverse events between groups (P = 0.772). Furthermore, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group (P < 0.001). Although no significant differences were found in heart rate and systolic blood pressure between groups (P > 0.05), and a significant main effect of time was observed for both variables (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noise management in the interventional radiology suite effectively alleviates intraoperative anxiety among patients with TACE and improves treatment satisfaction but has no significant effect on physiological changes and the incidence of adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noise & Health\",\"volume\":\"26 122\",\"pages\":\"325-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noise & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_53_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_53_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估介入放射科手术室噪音管理对接受经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)患者的影响:采用回顾性队列研究设计。研究对象包括2022年1月至2022年12月在南通市第一人民医院介入放射科接受TACE手术的肝细胞癌患者,共141例。根据是否接受噪音管理,将患者分为观察组(接受噪音管理,n = 70)和对照组(未接受噪音管理,n = 71)。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计数据和手术数据,并在手术前、手术中和手术后对患者的心率、血压和焦虑程度进行了评估。此外,还记录了满意度和不良反应的发生率:结果:总体特征无明显差异。观察组和对照组在噪音水平上有显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,焦虑水平在两组之间(P = 0.040)以及不同时间点之间(P < 0.001)存在显著差异。然而,在不良事件发生率方面,两组之间没有发现明显差异(P = 0.772)。此外,观察组患者的满意度明显高于对照组(P < 0.001)。虽然各组之间的心率和收缩压没有发现明显差异(P > 0.05),但两个变量都观察到了明显的时间主效应(P < 0.001):结论:介入放射室的噪音管理可有效缓解 TACE 患者的术中焦虑,提高治疗满意度,但对生理变化和不良事件的发生率无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Noise Management in Interventional Radiology Suites on Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of noise management in interventional radiology suites on patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included a total of 141 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent TACE surgery in interventional radiology suite of the First People's Hospital of Nantong from January 2022 to December 2022. The patients were divided into an observation group (received noise management, n = 70) and a control group (did not receive noise management, n = 71) on the basis of whether they received noise management. Patient demographics and surgical data were collected, and heart rate, blood pressure, and anxiety levels were assessed before, during and after surgery. Satisfaction and the incidence of adverse reactions were also documented.

Results: No significant differences were found in general characteristics. The comparison between the observation and control groups revealed statistically significant differences in noise levels (P < 0.001). Additionally, anxiety levels significantly differed between the two groups (P = 0.040) as well as across different time points (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in the occurrence of adverse events between groups (P = 0.772). Furthermore, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group (P < 0.001). Although no significant differences were found in heart rate and systolic blood pressure between groups (P > 0.05), and a significant main effect of time was observed for both variables (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Noise management in the interventional radiology suite effectively alleviates intraoperative anxiety among patients with TACE and improves treatment satisfaction but has no significant effect on physiological changes and the incidence of adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Noise & Health
Noise & Health AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Noise and Health is the only International Journal devoted to research on all aspects of noise and its effects on human health. An inter-disciplinary journal for all professions concerned with auditory and non-auditory effects of occupational, environmental, and leisure noise. It aims to provide a forum for presentation of novel research material on a broad range of topics associated with noise pollution, its control and its detrimental effects on hearing and health. It will cover issues from basic experimental science through clinical evaluation and management, technical aspects of noise reduction systems and solutions to environmental issues relating to social and public health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信