非格列酮治疗近期心衰恶化患者:FINEARTS-HF试验。

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Akshay S Desai, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L Claggett, Ian J Kulac, Pardeep S Jhund, Jonathan Cunningham, Maria Borentain, James Lay-Flurrie, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Katja Rohwedder, Flaviana Amarante, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Mikhail Kosiborod, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon
{"title":"非格列酮治疗近期心衰恶化患者:FINEARTS-HF试验。","authors":"Akshay S Desai, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L Claggett, Ian J Kulac, Pardeep S Jhund, Jonathan Cunningham, Maria Borentain, James Lay-Flurrie, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Katja Rohwedder, Flaviana Amarante, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Mikhail Kosiborod, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7 days, 7 days to 3 months, >3 months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7 days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7 days and 3 months, and 937 (15.6%) >3 months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7 days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7 days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7 days and 3 months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"106-116"},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Akshay S Desai, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L Claggett, Ian J Kulac, Pardeep S Jhund, Jonathan Cunningham, Maria Borentain, James Lay-Flurrie, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Katja Rohwedder, Flaviana Amarante, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Bertram Pitt, Mikhail Kosiborod, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7 days, 7 days to 3 months, >3 months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7 days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7 days and 3 months, and 937 (15.6%) >3 months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7 days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7 days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7 days and 3 months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"106-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:众所周知,心力衰竭(HF)患者近期发生过心力衰竭恶化(WHF)事件,无论射血分数如何,再次住院和死亡的风险都很高:本研究探讨了非甾体类矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)非诺酮的疗效和安全性与WHF事件复发率的关系:FINEARTS-HF(研究心力衰竭患者非格列酮优于安慰剂的疗效和安全性的非格列酮试验)是一项针对左室射血分数≥40%的心力衰竭患者的非格列酮随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。在这项预设分析中,我们评估了心血管 (CV) 事件的风险以及非奈伦与安慰剂的反应与从 WHF 到随机化的时间(期间或 7 天内、7 天到 3 个月、>3 个月或之前没有 WHF)的关系。主要结果是总WHF事件(首次和复发)和CV死亡的复合结果,采用比例率法进行分析:在 6,001 名被有效随机分配到非格列酮或安慰剂的患者中,1,219 人(20.3%)在发生 WHF 事件期间(749 人 [12.5%])或 7 天内(470 人 [7.8%])入组,2,028 人(33.8%)在 7 天至 3 个月期间入组,937 人(15.6%)在发生 WHF 事件 >3 个月期间入组;1,817 人(30.3%)既往无 WHF 病史。主要综合结果的发生率与WHF发生后的时间成反比,与WHF发生后3个月以上或既往无WHF者相比,在WHF发生期间或7天内入选者的风险高出2倍以上(风险比[RR]:2.13;95% CI:1.82-2.55)。与安慰剂相比,非格列酮似乎能在更大程度上降低 WHF 后 7 天内(RR:0.74;95% CI:0.57-0.95)或 WHF 后 7 天至 3 个月内(RR:0.79;95% CI:0.64-0.97)入组者的主要复合风险,而非 WHF 后 3 个月以上或未入组者的主要复合风险则较低(RR:0.99;95% CI:0.81-1.21);然而,无法证实治疗与时间之间存在明确的交互作用(P = 0.07)。因此,近期出现过 WHF 的患者使用非格列酮能降低更多的绝对风险(Ptrend = 0.011)。近期有WHF的患者发生高钾血症和肾功能恶化等不良事件的风险并没有增加:结论:与近期未发生 WHF 的患者相比,近期发生过 WHF 事件的射血分数轻度降低或保留的 HF 患者发生复发性 HF 事件和 CV 死亡的风险更高;在这一人群中,非格列酮可能会增加绝对治疗获益,这需要在未来的研究中进一步证实。(评估非奈酮对心力衰竭且左心室射血分数[每次心脏冲程排出的血液比例]大于或等于40%的参与者发病率[表明疾病恶化的事件]和死亡率[死亡率]的疗效[对疾病的影响]和安全性的研究[FINEARTS-HF],NCT04435626);一项旨在收集研究药物非格列酮对心力衰竭患者死亡和住院人数影响的信息的研究(EudraCT 2020-000306-29)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finerenone in Patients With a Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) and a recent worsening heart failure (WHF) event are known to be at high risk of recurrent hospitalization and death, regardless of ejection fraction.

Objectives: This study examined the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone in relation to the recency of a WHF event.

Methods: FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. In this prespecified analysis, we assessed the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and response to finerenone vs placebo in relation to the time from WHF to randomization (during or within 7 days, 7 days to 3 months, >3 months, or no prior WHF). The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) WHF events and CV death, analyzed using a proportional rates method.

Results: Of 6,001 patients validly randomized to finerenone or placebo, 1,219 (20.3%) were enrolled during (749 [12.5%]) or within 7 days (470 [7.8%]), 2,028 (33.8%) between 7 days and 3 months, and 937 (15.6%) >3 months from a WHF event; 1,817 (30.3%) had no prior history of WHF. Rates of the primary composite outcome varied inversely with time since WHF, with >2-fold higher risk in those enrolled during or within 7 days of WHF compared with those enrolled >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (risk ratio [RR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.82-2.55). Compared to placebo, finerenone appeared to lower the risk of the primary composite to a greater extent in those enrolled within 7 days of WHF (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95) or between 7 days and 3 months of WHF (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.97) than in those >3 months from WHF or without prior WHF (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21); however, no definitive treatment-by-time interaction could be confirmed (P = 0.07). Greater absolute risk reductions with finerenone were accordingly seen in those with recent WHF (Ptrend = 0.011). The risk of adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening renal function among patients assigned to finerenone was not increased in those with recent WHF.

Conclusions: Compared with those without recent WHF, patients with HF and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction who have experienced a recent WHF event are at higher risk for recurrent HF events and CV death; a possible signal of enhanced absolute treatment benefit with finerenone in this population requires further confirmation in future studies. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; A study to gather information on the influence of study drug finerenone on the number of deaths and hospitalizations in participants with heart failure EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信