拔罐疗法治疗偏头痛:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Bushra Mohandes, Fatma Elsayed Ahmed Bayoumi, Aisha Abdulkarim AllahDiwaya, Maryam Salah Falah, Leen Hesham Alhamd, Razan Abid Alsawadi, Yipeng Sun, Aidi Ma, Idris Sula, Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani
{"title":"拔罐疗法治疗偏头痛:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bushra Mohandes, Fatma Elsayed Ahmed Bayoumi, Aisha Abdulkarim AllahDiwaya, Maryam Salah Falah, Leen Hesham Alhamd, Razan Abid Alsawadi, Yipeng Sun, Aidi Ma, Idris Sula, Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani","doi":"10.3831/KPI.2024.27.3.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cupping therapy is a widely used complementary medicine for the treatment of migraine headaches globally. However, conflicting evidence exists on its effectiveness. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cupping therapy in treating migraine headache disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, SinoMed, and the National Science and Technology Library. The primary endpoints are the treatment success and the pain intensity reduction. The secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) risk and improvement in quality of life (QoL), which was based on the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the cupping techniques (wet and dry cupping) and adjunctive complementary treatments (i.e. acupuncture and/or collateral pricking).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen trials out of 348 records were included, pooling 1,446 participants (n = 797 received cupping therapy). Treatment success was significantly higher among those with cupping therapy (risk ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 1.83 [1.52-2.21]); with significant improvement observed only with wet cupping (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). The adjunctive complementary therapy did not achieve a greater amplitude of treatment success compared to cupping therapy alone. Furthermore, cupping therapy showed significant pain reduction compared to baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]) and achieved fewer risks of AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). However, cupping did not improve the overall QoL (MIDAS SMD [95% CI] = -0.79 [-3.55-1.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cupping therapy was an effective complementary modality to treat migraine headaches. However, it did not demonstrate improvement in QoL (PROSPERO CRD42024514509).</p>","PeriodicalId":16769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","volume":"27 3","pages":"177-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cupping Therapy for the Treatment of Migraine Headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Bushra Mohandes, Fatma Elsayed Ahmed Bayoumi, Aisha Abdulkarim AllahDiwaya, Maryam Salah Falah, Leen Hesham Alhamd, Razan Abid Alsawadi, Yipeng Sun, Aidi Ma, Idris Sula, Muhammad Candragupta Jihwaprani\",\"doi\":\"10.3831/KPI.2024.27.3.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cupping therapy is a widely used complementary medicine for the treatment of migraine headaches globally. However, conflicting evidence exists on its effectiveness. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cupping therapy in treating migraine headache disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, SinoMed, and the National Science and Technology Library. The primary endpoints are the treatment success and the pain intensity reduction. The secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) risk and improvement in quality of life (QoL), which was based on the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the cupping techniques (wet and dry cupping) and adjunctive complementary treatments (i.e. acupuncture and/or collateral pricking).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen trials out of 348 records were included, pooling 1,446 participants (n = 797 received cupping therapy). Treatment success was significantly higher among those with cupping therapy (risk ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 1.83 [1.52-2.21]); with significant improvement observed only with wet cupping (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). The adjunctive complementary therapy did not achieve a greater amplitude of treatment success compared to cupping therapy alone. Furthermore, cupping therapy showed significant pain reduction compared to baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]) and achieved fewer risks of AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). However, cupping did not improve the overall QoL (MIDAS SMD [95% CI] = -0.79 [-3.55-1.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cupping therapy was an effective complementary modality to treat migraine headaches. However, it did not demonstrate improvement in QoL (PROSPERO CRD42024514509).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"177-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacopuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2024.27.3.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacopuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2024.27.3.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:拔罐疗法是全球广泛使用的一种治疗偏头痛的辅助药物。然而,有关其有效性的证据却相互矛盾。目的:评估拔罐疗法治疗偏头痛的安全性和有效性:系统检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、Clinicaltrials.gov、Cochrane CENTRAL、ScienceDirect、ProQuest、SinoMed 和国家科技图书馆等七个数据库。主要终点为治疗成功率和疼痛强度降低率。次要终点为不良事件(AEs)风险和生活质量(QoL)改善,生活质量改善基于偏头痛残疾量表(MIDAS)。根据拔罐技术(湿拔罐和干拔罐)和辅助疗法(即针灸和/或刺络)进行了分组分析:共纳入了 18 项试验(共 348 条记录),1 446 名参与者(n = 797 人接受了拔罐疗法)。接受拔罐疗法的患者治疗成功率明显更高(风险比 [RR] [95% CI] = 1.83 [1.52-2.21]);只有湿拔罐疗法有明显改善(风险比 [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30])。与单独使用拔罐疗法相比,辅助补充疗法并没有取得更大的治疗效果。此外,与基线相比,拔罐疗法能显著减轻疼痛(标准化平均差 [SMD] [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]),并降低了发生 AEs 的风险(RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30])。然而,拔罐并未改善总体QoL(MIDAS SMD [95% CI] = -0.79 [-3.55-1.98]):结论:拔罐疗法是治疗偏头痛的一种有效辅助方式。结论:拔罐疗法是一种治疗偏头痛的有效辅助方法,但并不能改善患者的生活质量(PROSPERO CRD42024514509)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cupping Therapy for the Treatment of Migraine Headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Objectives: Cupping therapy is a widely used complementary medicine for the treatment of migraine headaches globally. However, conflicting evidence exists on its effectiveness. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cupping therapy in treating migraine headache disorder.

Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, SinoMed, and the National Science and Technology Library. The primary endpoints are the treatment success and the pain intensity reduction. The secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) risk and improvement in quality of life (QoL), which was based on the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the cupping techniques (wet and dry cupping) and adjunctive complementary treatments (i.e. acupuncture and/or collateral pricking).

Results: Eighteen trials out of 348 records were included, pooling 1,446 participants (n = 797 received cupping therapy). Treatment success was significantly higher among those with cupping therapy (risk ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 1.83 [1.52-2.21]); with significant improvement observed only with wet cupping (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). The adjunctive complementary therapy did not achieve a greater amplitude of treatment success compared to cupping therapy alone. Furthermore, cupping therapy showed significant pain reduction compared to baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]) and achieved fewer risks of AEs (RR [95% CI] = 1.88 [1.53-2.30]). However, cupping did not improve the overall QoL (MIDAS SMD [95% CI] = -0.79 [-3.55-1.98]).

Conclusion: Cupping therapy was an effective complementary modality to treat migraine headaches. However, it did not demonstrate improvement in QoL (PROSPERO CRD42024514509).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacopuncture
Journal of Pharmacopuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacopuncture covers a wide range of basic and clinical science research relevant to all aspects of the biotechnology of integrated approaches using both pharmacology and acupuncture therapeutics, including research involving pharmacology, acupuncture studies and pharmacopuncture studies. The subjects are mainly divided into three categories: pharmacology (applied phytomedicine, plant sciences, pharmacology, toxicology, medicinal plants, traditional medicines, herbal medicine, Sasang constitutional medicine, herbal formulae, foods, agricultural technologies, naturopathy, etc.), acupuncture (acupressure, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping, etc.), and pharmacopuncture (aqua-acupuncture, meridian pharmacopuncture, eight-principles pharmacopuncture, animal-based pharmacopuncture, mountain ginseng pharmacopuncture, bee venom therapy, needle embedding therapy, implant therapy, etc.). Other categories include chuna treatment, veterinary acupuncture and related animal studies, alternative medicines for treating cancer and cancer-related symptoms, etc. Broader topical coverage on the effects of acupuncture, the medical plants used in traditional and alternative medicine, pharmacological action and other related modalities, such as anthroposophy, homeopathy, ayurveda, bioelectromagnetic therapy, chiropractic, neural therapy and meditation, can be considered to be within the journal’s scope if based on acupoints and meridians. Submissions of original articles, review articles, systematic reviews, case reports, brief reports, opinions, commentaries, medical lectures, letters to the editor, photo-essays, technical notes, and book reviews are encouraged. Providing free access to the full text of all current and archived articles on its website (www.journal.ac), also searchable through a Google Scholar search.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信