肠道菌群反映了癫痫患者认知功能障碍的潜在风险因素。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
BingCong Hong
{"title":"肠道菌群反映了癫痫患者认知功能障碍的潜在风险因素。","authors":"BingCong Hong","doi":"10.1186/s41043-024-00639-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to analyze the differences in gut flora between patients with epilepsy with and without cognitive impairment and normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients with epilepsy who came to our hospital from 2020.12 to 2022.12 (epilepsy group) were selected, and another 100 family members of the patients were selected as the control group (control group). Patients with epilepsy were further classified by the MMSE scale into 62 patients with combined cognitive impairment (Yes group) and 38 patients without cognitive impairment (No group). Detection of gut flora in feces by 16 S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were more significant differences in the structure and composition of the gut flora between patients in the epilepsy group and the control group, but no significant differences in diversity analysis (P > 0.05). Actinobacteriota, Faecalibacterium and Collinsella were significantly lower in the Yes group than in the No group (P < 0.05), and the Alpha diversity index was numerically slightly smaller than in the No group, with the PCoA analysis demonstrating a more dispersed situation in both groups. Five metabolic pathways, including glycolysis and heterolactic fermentation, were upregulated in the Yes group. LEfSe analysis showed that five groups of bacteria, including Coriobacteriaceae and Collinsella, were selected as marker species for the presence or absence of comorbid cognitive impairment. Of these, Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy combined with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an imbalance in the gut flora of patients with epilepsy compared to healthy controls. The gut flora of patients with epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction differs significantly from that of patients without cognitive dysfunction. Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction and can be used as an indicator for the observation of epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut flora reflects potential risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"BingCong Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41043-024-00639-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to analyze the differences in gut flora between patients with epilepsy with and without cognitive impairment and normal subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients with epilepsy who came to our hospital from 2020.12 to 2022.12 (epilepsy group) were selected, and another 100 family members of the patients were selected as the control group (control group). Patients with epilepsy were further classified by the MMSE scale into 62 patients with combined cognitive impairment (Yes group) and 38 patients without cognitive impairment (No group). Detection of gut flora in feces by 16 S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were more significant differences in the structure and composition of the gut flora between patients in the epilepsy group and the control group, but no significant differences in diversity analysis (P > 0.05). Actinobacteriota, Faecalibacterium and Collinsella were significantly lower in the Yes group than in the No group (P < 0.05), and the Alpha diversity index was numerically slightly smaller than in the No group, with the PCoA analysis demonstrating a more dispersed situation in both groups. Five metabolic pathways, including glycolysis and heterolactic fermentation, were upregulated in the Yes group. LEfSe analysis showed that five groups of bacteria, including Coriobacteriaceae and Collinsella, were selected as marker species for the presence or absence of comorbid cognitive impairment. Of these, Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy combined with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an imbalance in the gut flora of patients with epilepsy compared to healthy controls. The gut flora of patients with epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction differs significantly from that of patients without cognitive dysfunction. Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction and can be used as an indicator for the observation of epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-024-00639-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-024-00639-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本横断面研究旨在分析伴有或不伴有认知障碍的癫痫患者与正常人肠道菌群的差异:选取 2020.12 至 2022.12 期间来我院就诊的 100 名癫痫患者(癫痫组),另选取 100 名患者家属作为对照组(对照组)。根据 MMSE 量表将癫痫患者进一步分为 62 名合并认知障碍的患者(是组)和 38 名无认知障碍的患者(非组)。通过 16 S rRNA 高通量测序检测粪便中的肠道菌群。采用逻辑回归分析癫痫患者认知功能障碍的风险因素:癫痫组患者与对照组患者的肠道菌群结构和组成存在较明显差异,但多样性分析无明显差异(P > 0.05)。是组的放线菌群、粪便杆菌和柯林斯菌明显低于否组(P 结论:是组的放线菌群、粪便杆菌和柯林斯菌明显低于否组(P 结论:否组的放线菌群、粪便杆菌和柯林斯菌明显低于是组:与健康对照组相比,癫痫患者的肠道菌群失衡。有认知功能障碍的癫痫患者的肠道菌群与无认知功能障碍的患者的肠道菌群明显不同。柯林斯菌科(Collinsella)、震颤球菌科(Oscillospirales)和反刍球菌科(Ruminococcaceae)对认知功能障碍癫痫患者的影响更大,可作为观察认知功能障碍癫痫患者的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gut flora reflects potential risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.

Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to analyze the differences in gut flora between patients with epilepsy with and without cognitive impairment and normal subjects.

Methods: One hundred patients with epilepsy who came to our hospital from 2020.12 to 2022.12 (epilepsy group) were selected, and another 100 family members of the patients were selected as the control group (control group). Patients with epilepsy were further classified by the MMSE scale into 62 patients with combined cognitive impairment (Yes group) and 38 patients without cognitive impairment (No group). Detection of gut flora in feces by 16 S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.

Results: There were more significant differences in the structure and composition of the gut flora between patients in the epilepsy group and the control group, but no significant differences in diversity analysis (P > 0.05). Actinobacteriota, Faecalibacterium and Collinsella were significantly lower in the Yes group than in the No group (P < 0.05), and the Alpha diversity index was numerically slightly smaller than in the No group, with the PCoA analysis demonstrating a more dispersed situation in both groups. Five metabolic pathways, including glycolysis and heterolactic fermentation, were upregulated in the Yes group. LEfSe analysis showed that five groups of bacteria, including Coriobacteriaceae and Collinsella, were selected as marker species for the presence or absence of comorbid cognitive impairment. Of these, Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy combined with cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: There was an imbalance in the gut flora of patients with epilepsy compared to healthy controls. The gut flora of patients with epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction differs significantly from that of patients without cognitive dysfunction. Collinsella, Oscillospirales, and Ruminococcaceae have a greater impact on epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction and can be used as an indicator for the observation of epilepsy with cognitive dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信