临床医生在宫颈癌筛查中采用 HPV 自我采样和自我检测意愿的相关因素。

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.604
Luke Brennan, Tiwaladeoluwa Adekunle, Monica Kasting, Michele R Forman, Victoria Champion, Natalia M Rodriguez
{"title":"临床医生在宫颈癌筛查中采用 HPV 自我采样和自我检测意愿的相关因素。","authors":"Luke Brennan, Tiwaladeoluwa Adekunle, Monica Kasting, Michele R Forman, Victoria Champion, Natalia M Rodriguez","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening rates in the USA fall behind national targets, requiring innovation to circumvent screening barriers. Cervical cancer screening where human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is performed on vaginal samples collected by the patients themselves (self-sampling) are effective and acceptable, and patient-operated rapid HPV tests (self-testing) are currently under development. It is unclear why there is ambivalence toward HPV self-sampling and self-testing among clinicians, an important stakeholder group. We conducted a mixed convergent quantitative and qualitative study to identify the factors influencing clinicians' attitudes toward self-sampling and self-testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of Midwest clinicians distributed by professional group media and a market research firm between May and November 2021 was analyzed (<i>n</i> = 248) alongside in-depth interviews with Midwest clinicians from professional groups (<i>n</i> = 23). Logistic regression models examined willingness to support self-sampling and self-testing across respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report that family practice physicians and those in rural areas were more willing to adopt HPV self-sampling (adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.16 [1.43-6.99]; aOR = 2.17 [1.01-4.68]). Clinician willingness to support self-testing was positively associated with current use of self-testing for other conditions and negatively associated with performing 10 or more monthly cervical cancer screenings (aOR = 2.02 [1.03-3.95], aOR = 0.42 [0.23-0.78]). Qualitative data contextualize how clinical specialty and experience with self-sampling and self-testing for other conditions inform clinician perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest clinician populations most accepting of initiatives to implement self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening and highlight that experience with other forms of self-testing could facilitate more widespread adoption for cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with clinician willingness to adopt HPV self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Brennan, Tiwaladeoluwa Adekunle, Monica Kasting, Michele R Forman, Victoria Champion, Natalia M Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening rates in the USA fall behind national targets, requiring innovation to circumvent screening barriers. Cervical cancer screening where human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is performed on vaginal samples collected by the patients themselves (self-sampling) are effective and acceptable, and patient-operated rapid HPV tests (self-testing) are currently under development. It is unclear why there is ambivalence toward HPV self-sampling and self-testing among clinicians, an important stakeholder group. We conducted a mixed convergent quantitative and qualitative study to identify the factors influencing clinicians' attitudes toward self-sampling and self-testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of Midwest clinicians distributed by professional group media and a market research firm between May and November 2021 was analyzed (<i>n</i> = 248) alongside in-depth interviews with Midwest clinicians from professional groups (<i>n</i> = 23). Logistic regression models examined willingness to support self-sampling and self-testing across respondent characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report that family practice physicians and those in rural areas were more willing to adopt HPV self-sampling (adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.16 [1.43-6.99]; aOR = 2.17 [1.01-4.68]). Clinician willingness to support self-testing was positively associated with current use of self-testing for other conditions and negatively associated with performing 10 or more monthly cervical cancer screenings (aOR = 2.02 [1.03-3.95], aOR = 0.42 [0.23-0.78]). Qualitative data contextualize how clinical specialty and experience with self-sampling and self-testing for other conditions inform clinician perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest clinician populations most accepting of initiatives to implement self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening and highlight that experience with other forms of self-testing could facilitate more widespread adoption for cervical cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国的宫颈癌筛查率落后于国家目标,需要创新来规避筛查障碍。通过患者自己采集的阴道样本进行人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测(自我采样)的宫颈癌筛查既有效又可接受,目前正在开发由患者操作的快速 HPV 检测(自我检测)。目前尚不清楚临床医生这一重要的利益相关群体为何对 HPV 自采样和自检测持矛盾态度。我们开展了一项定量和定性混合研究,以确定影响临床医生对自我采样和自我检测态度的因素:我们分析了 2021 年 5 月至 11 月期间由专业团体媒体和市场研究公司分发的中西部临床医生调查问卷(n = 248),以及对专业团体中西部临床医生的深度访谈(n = 23)。逻辑回归模型考察了不同受访者特征下支持自我采样和自我检测的意愿:结果:我们发现家庭医生和农村地区的医生更愿意采用 HPV 自我采样(调整后 OR (aOR) = 3.16 [1.43-6.99]; aOR = 2.17 [1.01-4.68])。临床医生支持自我检测的意愿与目前使用自我检测治疗其他疾病呈正相关,而与每月进行 10 次或更多次宫颈癌筛查呈负相关(aOR = 2.02 [1.03-3.95]; aOR = 0.42 [0.23-0.78])。定性数据说明了临床专业以及自我采样和自我检测其他疾病的经验如何影响临床医生的观点:这些数据表明,临床医生群体最能接受在宫颈癌筛查中实施自我采样和自我检测的举措,并强调其他形式的自我检测经验可促进宫颈癌筛查的更广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with clinician willingness to adopt HPV self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening.

Background: Cervical cancer screening rates in the USA fall behind national targets, requiring innovation to circumvent screening barriers. Cervical cancer screening where human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is performed on vaginal samples collected by the patients themselves (self-sampling) are effective and acceptable, and patient-operated rapid HPV tests (self-testing) are currently under development. It is unclear why there is ambivalence toward HPV self-sampling and self-testing among clinicians, an important stakeholder group. We conducted a mixed convergent quantitative and qualitative study to identify the factors influencing clinicians' attitudes toward self-sampling and self-testing.

Methods: A survey of Midwest clinicians distributed by professional group media and a market research firm between May and November 2021 was analyzed (n = 248) alongside in-depth interviews with Midwest clinicians from professional groups (n = 23). Logistic regression models examined willingness to support self-sampling and self-testing across respondent characteristics.

Results: We report that family practice physicians and those in rural areas were more willing to adopt HPV self-sampling (adjusted OR (aOR) = 3.16 [1.43-6.99]; aOR = 2.17 [1.01-4.68]). Clinician willingness to support self-testing was positively associated with current use of self-testing for other conditions and negatively associated with performing 10 or more monthly cervical cancer screenings (aOR = 2.02 [1.03-3.95], aOR = 0.42 [0.23-0.78]). Qualitative data contextualize how clinical specialty and experience with self-sampling and self-testing for other conditions inform clinician perspectives.

Conclusion: These data suggest clinician populations most accepting of initiatives to implement self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening and highlight that experience with other forms of self-testing could facilitate more widespread adoption for cervical cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信