Braden K Linn, Junru Zhao, Paul R Stasiewicz, Gregory E Wilding, Charles LaBarre, Kyler S Knapp, Clara M Bradizza
{"title":"消极情绪变异是酒精使用障碍治疗中行为改变的潜在机制。","authors":"Braden K Linn, Junru Zhao, Paul R Stasiewicz, Gregory E Wilding, Charles LaBarre, Kyler S Knapp, Clara M Bradizza","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Negative affect and affect variability figure prominently in models of addictive behaviors but are not without controversy. Negative affect variability may better capture a mechanism of behavior change in alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment because it contains information about affect regulation, a common clinical target. The aims of this study are to examine the change in: (a) trajectory of negative affect variability, (b) association of negative affect variability and abstinence, and (c) association of negative affect variability and heavy drinking during AUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article is a secondary analysis of data drawn from a randomized clinical trial. <i>N</i> = 181 participants diagnosed with <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition</i> AUD (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 50.8, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 10.6; 51.4% female) received 12 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy for AUD. Participants completed one daily diary prompt per day for 84 consecutive days. Each day, participants reported on negative affect and number of alcoholic drinks consumed the previous day. Time-varying effect models examined changes in negative affect variability and its associations with abstinence and heavy drinking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negative affect variability decreased throughout treatment. The positive association between negative affect variability and heavy drinking became nonsignificant (decoupled) midway through treatment. The inverse association between negative affect variability and daily abstinence became nonsignificant (decoupled) at approximately day 75 of 84. When mean levels of NA were added as a covariate, the effects were in the same direction but no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reductions in negative affect variability may capture an important change mechanism of behavioral treatments for AUD because it contains information about affect regulation as compared with mean levels of negative affect. Negative affect variability warrants further consideration as a mechanism of behavior change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"92 8","pages":"493-504"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative affect variability as a potential mechanism of behavior change in alcohol use disorder treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Braden K Linn, Junru Zhao, Paul R Stasiewicz, Gregory E Wilding, Charles LaBarre, Kyler S Knapp, Clara M Bradizza\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0000914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Negative affect and affect variability figure prominently in models of addictive behaviors but are not without controversy. Negative affect variability may better capture a mechanism of behavior change in alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment because it contains information about affect regulation, a common clinical target. The aims of this study are to examine the change in: (a) trajectory of negative affect variability, (b) association of negative affect variability and abstinence, and (c) association of negative affect variability and heavy drinking during AUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article is a secondary analysis of data drawn from a randomized clinical trial. <i>N</i> = 181 participants diagnosed with <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition</i> AUD (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 50.8, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 10.6; 51.4% female) received 12 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy for AUD. Participants completed one daily diary prompt per day for 84 consecutive days. Each day, participants reported on negative affect and number of alcoholic drinks consumed the previous day. Time-varying effect models examined changes in negative affect variability and its associations with abstinence and heavy drinking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negative affect variability decreased throughout treatment. The positive association between negative affect variability and heavy drinking became nonsignificant (decoupled) midway through treatment. The inverse association between negative affect variability and daily abstinence became nonsignificant (decoupled) at approximately day 75 of 84. When mean levels of NA were added as a covariate, the effects were in the same direction but no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reductions in negative affect variability may capture an important change mechanism of behavioral treatments for AUD because it contains information about affect regulation as compared with mean levels of negative affect. Negative affect variability warrants further consideration as a mechanism of behavior change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"92 8\",\"pages\":\"493-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000914\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Negative affect variability as a potential mechanism of behavior change in alcohol use disorder treatment.
Objective: Negative affect and affect variability figure prominently in models of addictive behaviors but are not without controversy. Negative affect variability may better capture a mechanism of behavior change in alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment because it contains information about affect regulation, a common clinical target. The aims of this study are to examine the change in: (a) trajectory of negative affect variability, (b) association of negative affect variability and abstinence, and (c) association of negative affect variability and heavy drinking during AUD treatment.
Method: This article is a secondary analysis of data drawn from a randomized clinical trial. N = 181 participants diagnosed with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition AUD (Mage = 50.8, SDage = 10.6; 51.4% female) received 12 sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy for AUD. Participants completed one daily diary prompt per day for 84 consecutive days. Each day, participants reported on negative affect and number of alcoholic drinks consumed the previous day. Time-varying effect models examined changes in negative affect variability and its associations with abstinence and heavy drinking.
Results: Negative affect variability decreased throughout treatment. The positive association between negative affect variability and heavy drinking became nonsignificant (decoupled) midway through treatment. The inverse association between negative affect variability and daily abstinence became nonsignificant (decoupled) at approximately day 75 of 84. When mean levels of NA were added as a covariate, the effects were in the same direction but no longer statistically significant.
Conclusion: Reductions in negative affect variability may capture an important change mechanism of behavioral treatments for AUD because it contains information about affect regulation as compared with mean levels of negative affect. Negative affect variability warrants further consideration as a mechanism of behavior change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
