成人烧伤严重程度:基于国家烧伤研究数据集的拟议定义。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jason Heard, Yuni Ren, Sandra L Taylor, S Sen, T Palmieri, K Romanowski, D Greenhalgh
{"title":"成人烧伤严重程度:基于国家烧伤研究数据集的拟议定义。","authors":"Jason Heard, Yuni Ren, Sandra L Taylor, S Sen, T Palmieri, K Romanowski, D Greenhalgh","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous iterations of burn severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were not data-driven and were outdated. Clustering analyses have gained popularity for identifying homogenous subgroups from heterogeneous medical conditions, such as asthma, sepsis, and lung disease. There is no consensus in burn literature regarding what constitutes massive burns. The current classification includes a 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn and a 95% TBSA burn as severe. Latent class and hierarchical clustering analyses were applied to the American Burn Association National Burn Research Dataset. Cluster variables included length of stay, length of stay, intensive care unit length of, number and type of procedures, and number and type of complications. Non-clustering variables were evaluated after clustering, including burned TBSA, inhalation injury, mortality, discharge disposition, age, sex, and race. Latent class analysis suggested three clusters. Hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to the most severe latent class, creating four total burn severity groups. In total, 112,297 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean TBSA burned for each class is 4.26±4.91 for minor, 8.07±8.39 for moderate, 22.76±17.31 for severe and 36.72±21.61 for massive. The age and sex proportions were similar among all clusters. The clustering variables steadily increased for each severity cluster. Mortality was the highest in the massive cluster (18.2%). Data informed categories of burn severity were formed using clustering analyses, which will be helpful for triage, data-benchmarking, and class-specific research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burn Injury Severity in Adults: Proposed Definitions Based on the National Burn Research Dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Heard, Yuni Ren, Sandra L Taylor, S Sen, T Palmieri, K Romanowski, D Greenhalgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous iterations of burn severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were not data-driven and were outdated. Clustering analyses have gained popularity for identifying homogenous subgroups from heterogeneous medical conditions, such as asthma, sepsis, and lung disease. There is no consensus in burn literature regarding what constitutes massive burns. The current classification includes a 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn and a 95% TBSA burn as severe. Latent class and hierarchical clustering analyses were applied to the American Burn Association National Burn Research Dataset. Cluster variables included length of stay, length of stay, intensive care unit length of, number and type of procedures, and number and type of complications. Non-clustering variables were evaluated after clustering, including burned TBSA, inhalation injury, mortality, discharge disposition, age, sex, and race. Latent class analysis suggested three clusters. Hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to the most severe latent class, creating four total burn severity groups. In total, 112,297 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean TBSA burned for each class is 4.26±4.91 for minor, 8.07±8.39 for moderate, 22.76±17.31 for severe and 36.72±21.61 for massive. The age and sex proportions were similar among all clusters. The clustering variables steadily increased for each severity cluster. Mortality was the highest in the massive cluster (18.2%). Data informed categories of burn severity were formed using clustering analyses, which will be helpful for triage, data-benchmarking, and class-specific research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前的烧伤严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)不是由数据驱动的,而且已经过时。聚类分析在从哮喘、败血症和肺部疾病等异质病症中识别同质亚组方面颇受欢迎。烧伤文献对什么是大面积烧伤没有达成共识。目前的分类包括 20% 总体表面积 (TBSA) 烧伤和 95% 总体表面积烧伤为重度烧伤。美国烧伤协会国家烧伤研究数据集采用了潜类和分层聚类分析。聚类变量包括住院时间、住院时间、重症监护室时间、手术数量和类型以及并发症数量和类型。聚类后还对非聚类变量进行了评估,包括烧伤总面积、吸入性损伤、死亡率、出院处置、年龄、性别和种族。潜类分析显示有三个聚类。对最严重的潜类进行了分层聚类分析,共创建了四个烧伤严重程度组。共有 112,297 名患者被纳入最终分析。每个等级的平均烧伤总面积分别为:轻度(4.26±4.91)、中度(8.07±8.39)、重度(22.76±17.31)和大面积(36.72±21.61)。所有分组的年龄和性别比例相似。各严重程度分组的分组变量稳步增加。大面积烧伤组的死亡率最高(18.2%)。通过聚类分析形成了烧伤严重程度的数据类别,这将有助于分流、数据基准和特定类别的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burn Injury Severity in Adults: Proposed Definitions Based on the National Burn Research Dataset.

Previous iterations of burn severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were not data-driven and were outdated. Clustering analyses have gained popularity for identifying homogenous subgroups from heterogeneous medical conditions, such as asthma, sepsis, and lung disease. There is no consensus in burn literature regarding what constitutes massive burns. The current classification includes a 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn and a 95% TBSA burn as severe. Latent class and hierarchical clustering analyses were applied to the American Burn Association National Burn Research Dataset. Cluster variables included length of stay, length of stay, intensive care unit length of, number and type of procedures, and number and type of complications. Non-clustering variables were evaluated after clustering, including burned TBSA, inhalation injury, mortality, discharge disposition, age, sex, and race. Latent class analysis suggested three clusters. Hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to the most severe latent class, creating four total burn severity groups. In total, 112,297 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean TBSA burned for each class is 4.26±4.91 for minor, 8.07±8.39 for moderate, 22.76±17.31 for severe and 36.72±21.61 for massive. The age and sex proportions were similar among all clusters. The clustering variables steadily increased for each severity cluster. Mortality was the highest in the massive cluster (18.2%). Data informed categories of burn severity were formed using clustering analyses, which will be helpful for triage, data-benchmarking, and class-specific research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信