Wolfgang List, Martin Dirisamer, Wolfgang Johann Mayer, Mehdi Shajari, Wilfried Glatz, Jakob Gran, Andreas Wedrich, Gernot Steinwender
{"title":"散光隱形眼鏡對齊的數位軸心標記與手動軸心標記：一項前瞻性隨機個體內試驗。","authors":"Wolfgang List, Martin Dirisamer, Wolfgang Johann Mayer, Mehdi Shajari, Wilfried Glatz, Jakob Gran, Andreas Wedrich, Gernot Steinwender","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares visual and refractive outcomes and postoperative axis alignment for toric Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation in astigmatic myopia using manual versus digital marking techniques.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized single-centered intraindividual comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing bilateral toric ICL implantation for myopia with astigmatism ≥ 0.5 diopters (D) were enrolled. Patients received both marking techniques and randomization was performed. Postoperative retroillumination photography assessed axis alignment, and visual and refractive parameters were evaluated. Duration of the surgeries was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study includes 20 patients and 40 eyes. Preoperative visual and refractive parameters showed no significant differences. Postoperatively, residual astigmatism (p=0.824) and spherical equivalent (p=0.309) were comparable. No notable differences between right and left eyes in terms of preoperative (p=0.371) and postoperative (p=0.824) astigmatism were observed. Although slight, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) increased in both groups postoperatively (p=0.381). Gain in CDVA was comparable between marking techniques (p=0.637). Safety and efficacy indices were comparable (p=0.991 and p=0.189, respectively). Postoperative axial misalignment was 2.8±3.1 degrees in the digital- and 4.4±5.1 degrees in the manual group (p=0.260). Vector analysis showed no significant differences between manual and digital marking. Duration remained uninfluenced by the marking technique (p=0.970) and side of surgery (p=0.682).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion digital and manual marking techniques provided comparable results in axis alignment, surgical duration and visual and refractive outcomes. Both methods are viable for precise axis alignment, with digital marking offering a potential advantage in efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital versus manual axis marking for toric phakic intraocular lens alignment: a prospective randomized intraindividual trial.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang List, Martin Dirisamer, Wolfgang Johann Mayer, Mehdi Shajari, Wilfried Glatz, Jakob Gran, Andreas Wedrich, Gernot Steinwender\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares visual and refractive outcomes and postoperative axis alignment for toric Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation in astigmatic myopia using manual versus digital marking techniques.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized single-centered intraindividual comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing bilateral toric ICL implantation for myopia with astigmatism ≥ 0.5 diopters (D) were enrolled. Patients received both marking techniques and randomization was performed. Postoperative retroillumination photography assessed axis alignment, and visual and refractive parameters were evaluated. Duration of the surgeries was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study includes 20 patients and 40 eyes. Preoperative visual and refractive parameters showed no significant differences. Postoperatively, residual astigmatism (p=0.824) and spherical equivalent (p=0.309) were comparable. No notable differences between right and left eyes in terms of preoperative (p=0.371) and postoperative (p=0.824) astigmatism were observed. Although slight, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) increased in both groups postoperatively (p=0.381). Gain in CDVA was comparable between marking techniques (p=0.637). Safety and efficacy indices were comparable (p=0.991 and p=0.189, respectively). Postoperative axial misalignment was 2.8±3.1 degrees in the digital- and 4.4±5.1 degrees in the manual group (p=0.260). Vector analysis showed no significant differences between manual and digital marking. Duration remained uninfluenced by the marking technique (p=0.970) and side of surgery (p=0.682).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion digital and manual marking techniques provided comparable results in axis alignment, surgical duration and visual and refractive outcomes. Both methods are viable for precise axis alignment, with digital marking offering a potential advantage in efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital versus manual axis marking for toric phakic intraocular lens alignment: a prospective randomized intraindividual trial.
Purpose: This study compares visual and refractive outcomes and postoperative axis alignment for toric Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation in astigmatic myopia using manual versus digital marking techniques.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Methods: Patients undergoing bilateral toric ICL implantation for myopia with astigmatism ≥ 0.5 diopters (D) were enrolled. Patients received both marking techniques and randomization was performed. Postoperative retroillumination photography assessed axis alignment, and visual and refractive parameters were evaluated. Duration of the surgeries was recorded.
Results: The study includes 20 patients and 40 eyes. Preoperative visual and refractive parameters showed no significant differences. Postoperatively, residual astigmatism (p=0.824) and spherical equivalent (p=0.309) were comparable. No notable differences between right and left eyes in terms of preoperative (p=0.371) and postoperative (p=0.824) astigmatism were observed. Although slight, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) increased in both groups postoperatively (p=0.381). Gain in CDVA was comparable between marking techniques (p=0.637). Safety and efficacy indices were comparable (p=0.991 and p=0.189, respectively). Postoperative axial misalignment was 2.8±3.1 degrees in the digital- and 4.4±5.1 degrees in the manual group (p=0.260). Vector analysis showed no significant differences between manual and digital marking. Duration remained uninfluenced by the marking technique (p=0.970) and side of surgery (p=0.682).
Conclusion: In conclusion digital and manual marking techniques provided comparable results in axis alignment, surgical duration and visual and refractive outcomes. Both methods are viable for precise axis alignment, with digital marking offering a potential advantage in efficacy.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
