在 COVID-19 大流行期间对抑郁和焦虑症状进行有聊天支持和无聊天支持的基于网络的自我指导干预的评估和未来挑战:随机对照试验。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Sergio Sanz-Gomez, Leivy Patricia González Ramírez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Lorena Edith Trevino Garcia, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Joel Omar González-Cantero, Valeria Macias-Aguinaga, Paulina Arenas Landgrave, Sarah Margarita Chávez-Valdez
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间对抑郁和焦虑症状进行有聊天支持和无聊天支持的基于网络的自我指导干预的评估和未来挑战:随机对照试验。","authors":"Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Sergio Sanz-Gomez, Leivy Patricia González Ramírez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Lorena Edith Trevino Garcia, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Joel Omar González-Cantero, Valeria Macias-Aguinaga, Paulina Arenas Landgrave, Sarah Margarita Chávez-Valdez","doi":"10.2196/53767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on mental health worldwide. Low- and middle-income countries were largely affected by it. Mexico was one of the most affected countries. Extended periods of lockdowns, isolation, and social distancing, among other factors, highlighted the need to introduce web-based psychological interventions to the Mexican population. In this context, Mental Health COVID-19 emerged as a self-guided web-based intervention (SGWI) aimed at adults to improve mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy of 2 modalities of a self-guided intervention (with and without chat support) in reducing depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation. In addition, it aimed to compare the moderating role of coping strategies, acceptance, and satisfaction in participants' symptom reduction. We hypothesize that the self-guided, chat-supported modality will show higher efficacy than the modality without chat support in achieving clinical change and better performance as a moderator of depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation, as well as an increase in participants' satisfaction and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Data were collected from May 2020 to June 2022. We performed intrasubject measures at 4 evaluation periods: pretest, posttest, and follow-up measurements at 3 and 6 months. Differences between intervention groups were assessed through the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Changes due to intervention were analyzed using Wilcoxon W test. Moderated regression analysis was performed to test the hypothesized moderating role of coping strategies, usability, and opinion about treatment on clinical change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 participants completed the intervention; of these, 5 (14%) were part of the SGWI group, and 31 (86%) were on the SGWI plus chat support (SGWI+C) group, which included a chat service with therapists. The perceived high complexity of the system for the SGWI group had a moderating effect associated with a lack of efficacy of the intervention regarding depression, but not when controlled for sociodemographic variables. A perception of lower helpfulness of the intervention was associated with poorer outcomes. Coping strategies did not show moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhancing the utility of web-based interventions for reducing clinical symptoms by incorporating a support chat to boost treatment adherence seemed to improve the perception of the intervention's usefulness. Web-based interventions face several challenges, such as eliminating complexities in platform use and increasing the users' perceived utility of the intervention, among other issues identified in the study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468893; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04468893?tab=results.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/23117.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Future Challenges in a Self-Guided Web-Based Intervention With and Without Chat Support for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Sergio Sanz-Gomez, Leivy Patricia González Ramírez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Lorena Edith Trevino Garcia, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Joel Omar González-Cantero, Valeria Macias-Aguinaga, Paulina Arenas Landgrave, Sarah Margarita Chávez-Valdez\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/53767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on mental health worldwide. Low- and middle-income countries were largely affected by it. Mexico was one of the most affected countries. Extended periods of lockdowns, isolation, and social distancing, among other factors, highlighted the need to introduce web-based psychological interventions to the Mexican population. In this context, Mental Health COVID-19 emerged as a self-guided web-based intervention (SGWI) aimed at adults to improve mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy of 2 modalities of a self-guided intervention (with and without chat support) in reducing depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation. In addition, it aimed to compare the moderating role of coping strategies, acceptance, and satisfaction in participants' symptom reduction. We hypothesize that the self-guided, chat-supported modality will show higher efficacy than the modality without chat support in achieving clinical change and better performance as a moderator of depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation, as well as an increase in participants' satisfaction and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Data were collected from May 2020 to June 2022. We performed intrasubject measures at 4 evaluation periods: pretest, posttest, and follow-up measurements at 3 and 6 months. Differences between intervention groups were assessed through the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Changes due to intervention were analyzed using Wilcoxon W test. Moderated regression analysis was performed to test the hypothesized moderating role of coping strategies, usability, and opinion about treatment on clinical change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 participants completed the intervention; of these, 5 (14%) were part of the SGWI group, and 31 (86%) were on the SGWI plus chat support (SGWI+C) group, which included a chat service with therapists. The perceived high complexity of the system for the SGWI group had a moderating effect associated with a lack of efficacy of the intervention regarding depression, but not when controlled for sociodemographic variables. A perception of lower helpfulness of the intervention was associated with poorer outcomes. Coping strategies did not show moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhancing the utility of web-based interventions for reducing clinical symptoms by incorporating a support chat to boost treatment adherence seemed to improve the perception of the intervention's usefulness. Web-based interventions face several challenges, such as eliminating complexities in platform use and increasing the users' perceived utility of the intervention, among other issues identified in the study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468893; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04468893?tab=results.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/23117.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/53767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行对全世界的心理健康产生了影响。中低收入国家在很大程度上受到了影响。墨西哥是受影响最严重的国家之一。长期的封锁、隔离和社会疏离等因素突出表明,有必要向墨西哥民众介绍基于网络的心理干预措施。在这种情况下,心理健康 COVID-19 应运而生,它是一种基于网络的自我指导干预措施(SGWI),旨在帮助成年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间改善心理健康:本研究旨在评估两种自我指导干预模式(有聊天支持和无聊天支持)在减轻抑郁症状、广泛焦虑、社区创伤后应激、广泛恐惧、焦虑、睡眠质量、生理和情感应对以及自杀意念方面的效果。此外,该研究还旨在比较应对策略、接受度和满意度对参与者症状减轻的调节作用。我们假设,与没有聊天支持的模式相比,有聊天支持的自我指导模式在实现临床改变方面将表现出更高的有效性,在抑郁症状、广泛焦虑、社区创伤后应激、广泛恐惧、焦虑、睡眠质量、生理和情感应对以及自杀意念的调节方面表现出更好的性能,同时参与者的满意度和接受度也将提高:方法:进行随机对照试验。数据收集时间为 2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 6 月。我们在4个评估阶段进行了受试者内部测量:前测、后测以及3个月和6个月的随访测量。干预组之间的差异通过连续变量的曼-惠特尼 U 检验和分类变量的卡方检验进行评估。干预引起的变化采用 Wilcoxon W 检验进行分析。进行了调节回归分析,以检验应对策略、可用性和对治疗的看法对临床变化的假设调节作用:共有 36 名参与者完成了干预,其中 5 人(14%)属于 SGWI 组,31 人(86%)属于 SGWI 加聊天支持(SGWI+C)组,该组包括与治疗师的聊天服务。SGWI组认为系统的复杂性较高,这对抑郁症干预效果不佳产生了调节作用,但在控制了社会人口变量后,这种作用并不明显。认为干预措施对抑郁症患者的帮助较小的人,其结果也较差。应对策略没有显示出调节作用:结论:通过加入支持聊天来提高治疗依从性,从而增强网络干预对减少临床症状的效用,这似乎提高了人们对干预效用的认识。基于网络的干预措施面临着一些挑战,如消除平台使用中的复杂性和提高用户对干预措施效用的感知,以及研究中发现的其他问题:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468893;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04468893?tab=results.International 注册报告标识符(irrid):RR2-10.2196/23117。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and Future Challenges in a Self-Guided Web-Based Intervention With and Without Chat Support for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on mental health worldwide. Low- and middle-income countries were largely affected by it. Mexico was one of the most affected countries. Extended periods of lockdowns, isolation, and social distancing, among other factors, highlighted the need to introduce web-based psychological interventions to the Mexican population. In this context, Mental Health COVID-19 emerged as a self-guided web-based intervention (SGWI) aimed at adults to improve mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: This study aims to assess the efficacy of 2 modalities of a self-guided intervention (with and without chat support) in reducing depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation. In addition, it aimed to compare the moderating role of coping strategies, acceptance, and satisfaction in participants' symptom reduction. We hypothesize that the self-guided, chat-supported modality will show higher efficacy than the modality without chat support in achieving clinical change and better performance as a moderator of depression symptoms, generalized anxiety, community posttraumatic stress, widespread fear, anxiety, sleep quality, physiological and affective coping, and suicide ideation, as well as an increase in participants' satisfaction and acceptability.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Data were collected from May 2020 to June 2022. We performed intrasubject measures at 4 evaluation periods: pretest, posttest, and follow-up measurements at 3 and 6 months. Differences between intervention groups were assessed through the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Changes due to intervention were analyzed using Wilcoxon W test. Moderated regression analysis was performed to test the hypothesized moderating role of coping strategies, usability, and opinion about treatment on clinical change.

Results: A total of 36 participants completed the intervention; of these, 5 (14%) were part of the SGWI group, and 31 (86%) were on the SGWI plus chat support (SGWI+C) group, which included a chat service with therapists. The perceived high complexity of the system for the SGWI group had a moderating effect associated with a lack of efficacy of the intervention regarding depression, but not when controlled for sociodemographic variables. A perception of lower helpfulness of the intervention was associated with poorer outcomes. Coping strategies did not show moderating effects.

Conclusions: Enhancing the utility of web-based interventions for reducing clinical symptoms by incorporating a support chat to boost treatment adherence seemed to improve the perception of the intervention's usefulness. Web-based interventions face several challenges, such as eliminating complexities in platform use and increasing the users' perceived utility of the intervention, among other issues identified in the study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468893; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04468893?tab=results.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/23117.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信